We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."I find the integration with other tools very easy."
"It is very fast - faster than an SQL or MySQL Server."
"Easier to maintain the data with its document-based storage."
"One of the most valuable features of MongoDB is it is Its open source."
"One of the first things I noticed when I had my first experience with MongoDB was how easy it was to use. I was expecting more difficulties or at least some challenges, but it was very, very easy to use. It's great technology, performs well, and is very convenient."
"The solution does not hold data in tabular format like SQL does but rather clusters data so that it can link on a large scale."
"MongoDB's best features are scalability, document management, and data security."
"MongoDB has a simple data-loading interface."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"The tool performs well."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"There is a need for improvement in MongoDB's customer support."
"The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time."
"People coming from RDBMS should have the flexibility to write queries in SQL that can be converted into JSON queries."
"MongoDB would be improved with more integration, particularly for cloud environments like Google BigQuery."
"There should be better integration with other databases."
"MongoDB should be more stable, and support should be more efficient."
"It has certain limitations when it comes to handling hierarchical data, enforcing relationships, and performing complex joins, which should be taken into account when designing databases for applications with intricate data requirements."
"We find it difficult to incorporate MongoDB in some projects."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"The installation is difficult."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The licensing model is bad."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 69 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle Berkeley DB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB, Couchbase and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.