

Ping Identity Platform and Microsoft Purview Information Protection are competing products in identity security and information protection. Microsoft Purview Information Protection has the upper hand in features and data satisfaction, while Ping Identity Platform is strong in support and pricing.
Features: Ping Identity Platform provides robust identity management, secure access, and authentication processes. Its capabilities focus on seamless integration of multiple identity providers and effective management of access policies. Microsoft Purview Information Protection excels in data classification, labeling, encryption tools, and offers automatic protection and access control for assets across multi-platform environments. It also supports compliance with regional laws through its comprehensive data governance features.
Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could enhance its feature set by expanding its data protection capabilities and improving its customization options for more dynamic environments. Further integration with on-premises systems could also improve its appeal. Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve simplicity in deployment and enhance support for complex IT environments. There is potential to expand its classification capabilities to include video and audio files, and improve performance for on-premises systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive support, making integration into varied IT environments efficient. Microsoft Purview Information Protection involves a more complex deployment but compensates with specialized implementation support tailored for extensive data governance needs.
Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform offers competitive setup costs and quick returns by providing secure user access without a high initial expenditure. Microsoft Purview Information Protection, despite higher upfront costs, promises long-term ROI with its advanced data management and protection capabilities. Ping Identity Platform is an attractive choice for budget-conscious buyers, while Microsoft Purview Information Protection delivers value for comprehensive data strategies.
Purview can do a quick scan, and it doesn't use human resources, so it gets time to do things that we need humans to focus on.
The E5 license comes with different solutions like data discovery classification, CASB, DLP solutions, and Defender for Cloud.
The cost of data loss and your data going to a competitor is potentially massive.
Sometimes, I get a fast and knowledgeable response, while other times, I've experienced delays and received no resolution.
It's hard to be an ambassador for a product when you know it will be hard to get support.
After our issues are reported, it takes a long time to find a resolution.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
The problem with the support team is that I do not like support; the day of the threat image, they never come on the call and unless it is a priority, they never come to call to defend it and to provide any kind of solutions.
I would rate the technical support for Ping Identity Platform seven out of ten because of their limited support and late availability.
It can be scaled across different departments organization-wide very quickly and easily.
It can handle large collections of data without issues.
Scalability can be improved by reducing these intervals.
Once implemented, I haven't had issues with its consistency.
The product is stable, and whatever it does, it does better than any other thing.
Since identity is where everything is based, if that goes down, you're screwed.
Ping Identity Platform demonstrates strong stability, as it is not prone to bugs.
In terms of stability for Ping Identity Platform, we haven't faced any issues till now.
Overall, I see PingFederate as a stable product.
Effectiveness in Microsoft Purview Information Protection means enforcing the policy and making sure it works consistently across non-Microsoft products as well.
A lot of functionality in Microsoft Purview Information Protection is not exposed in an API officially yet, which has made a lot of implementation work difficult because we have to do click ops instead of DevOps.
Having a roadmap or updates about new releases would be helpful for demonstrating to clients.
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems.
I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started.
The E5 license covers most of the solutions for different technologies, so that way, it is good and more affordable compared to any other solution.
Our focus is on helping customers maximize their software investment.
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
Microsoft Copilot is an advantage because it's enterprise-grade AI.
It's paramount to have a single solution for information protection.
Regardless of the education, the employee might share the information anyway, so the AI shouldn't be the first point of failure. It should be a human making good decisions.
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
Ping Identity Platform can be accessed both on-premises and in the cloud, allowing for high flexibility in creating user flows and policies tailored to client requirements.
It's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Information Protection | 1.9% |
| Ping Identity Platform | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers sensitivity labels, automated classification, and encryption to protect data across platforms while integrating with M365, Azure, and AWS to prevent unauthorized access and enhance data governance.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection supports compliance with regulatory standards through features like data loss prevention and intuitive DLP rules. It integrates with multiple platforms such as M365, Azure, and AWS for extensive data protection. The platform helps manage sensitive data through automated labeling and effective policy deployment. While there are areas needing improvement like third-party integration, API support, and policy enforcement consistency, Purview remains a powerful tool for businesses to assess data usage and reduce unauthorized access.
What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Information Protection?Companies across various industries implement Microsoft Purview Information Protection to apply sensitivity labels to emails and cloud content like OneDrive and SharePoint. It's utilized for data classification, loss prevention, and governance. Microsoft partners use it for SAP integration and compliance assessments, while consultants focus on protecting and managing data efficiently for clients centered around Microsoft solutions.
Ping Identity Platform offers cloud capabilities for applications, supporting Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and passwordless authentication. It features flexible integrations and federated identity management, enhancing security through detailed compliance features and seamless IDP integration.
This platform meets enterprise needs with role-based access control, device management, API security, and risk-based adaptations. Its BYOD support, ease of integration, biometric authentication methods, and customizable options with PingFederate aid in enhancing security and convenience. Challenges such as the complex management console, network reliability, and limited customization are present. Users find areas for improvement in incident response features, bio-certification, and network handling for IP classification. Community support and documentation need strengthening to address existing device tracking and token management issues.
What are the key features of Ping Identity Platform?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, enterprises deploy Ping Identity Platform for its ability to implement seamless SSO and MFA. It integrates with protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect to secure communications and user identities. This enhances security and user convenience for customer-facing and internal applications.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.