Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID Governance and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Google and others in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS).
To learn more, read our detailed Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.""The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance for identity management is multi-factor authentication.""Access reviews are an essential feature of Entra Governance. Additionally, privileged identity management is one of its most valuable features. Just-in-time access, or Jet GIT, is integral to this system. Moreover, user behavior analytics stands out as one of its top features."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Pros →

"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great.""The solution is simple to use.""The interface is easy to use."

More Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Pros →

Cons
"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies.""Microsoft has done a commendable job with RPAX. However, Microsoft should prioritize enhancing its ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) capabilities. Currently, Microsoft's ABAC offering falls behind AWS in comparison.""The solution lacks the feature to work well with third-party applications.""The platform's configuration process needs improvement."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Cons →

"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure.""Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users.""SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."

More Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."
  • More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.
    Top Answer:The solution lacks the feature to work well with third-party applications. Microsoft Entra ID Governance does not provide full-fledged governance features that are provided by other tools, such as… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for SoD, access certification, access review, and access package, which will include Microsoft applications like Teams or SharePoint.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    84
    Comparisons
    31
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    279
    Rating
    6.0
    Views
    901
    Comparisons
    530
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SafeNet Trusted Access, Gemalto SafeNet Trusted Access
    Learn More
    Overview

    Protect any identity and secure access to any resource with a family of multicloud identity and network access solutions.
    Safeguard connections between people, apps, resources, and devices with multicloud identity and network access products.
    Take advantage of adaptive identity and network access controls to secure access to any app or resource for every user or digital workload across your entire environment.
    Implement consistent security policies for every user—employees, frontline workers, customers, partners—as well as apps, devices, and workloads across multicloud and hybrid.
    Discover and right-size permissions, manage access lifecycles, and ensure least privilege access for any identity.
    Reduce IT friction and improve the hybrid workforce experience with seamless access to any resource, single sign-on, user self-service management, and automated lifecycle workflows.

    Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is a comprehensive access management solution that provides secure and seamless access to cloud and web applications. It offers a range of features, including multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and adaptive authentication. With SafeNet, organizations can easily manage user access, enforce security policies, and monitor user activity to prevent cyber threats. 

    The solution is highly scalable and can be customized to meet the unique needs of any organization. Overall, SafeNet is a reliable and effective solution for preventing cyber threats and ensuring secure access to critical applications and data.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    IBM, Western Union, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Novartis, and AT&T.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization42%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise52%
    Large Enterprise32%
    Buyer's Guide
    Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Google and others in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Entra ID Governance is ranked 23rd in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 4 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). Microsoft Entra ID Governance is rated 6.4, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID Governance writes "Offers comprehensive solutions that bring significant benefits". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Microsoft Entra ID Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, SailPoint IdentityIQ and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

    See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.