Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management comparison

Microsoft and WithSecure are both solutions in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while WithSecure is ranked #49. Microsoft holds a 9.7% mindshare in CSPM, compared to WithSecure’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Read 78 Microsoft Defender for Cloud reviews
  • 8,433 Views
  • 1,087 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
WithSecure Cloud Security P...
Read 1 WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management review
  • 105 Views
  • 5 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Microsoft Defender for Cloud and WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management are in the cloud security category. Microsoft Defender for Cloud has an upper hand due to its integration and comprehensive security features.

Features: Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers advanced threat protection, seamless integration with Azure, and a cohesive cloud ecosystem. WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management provides granular visibility, compliance-focused features, and specialized compliance enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Cloud is noted for straightforward deployment, particularly in Azure environments, and effective customer support. WithSecure offers a customized deployment experience with strong compliance support but may require a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Cloud features flexible pricing options with scalable ROI, especially for Microsoft ecosystem users, making integration cost-effective. WithSecure focuses on value for compliance-enhanced features but might involve higher initial setup costs compared to Microsoft.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (7th), Container Management (9th), Container Security (6th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (5th), Microsoft Security Suite (7th), Compliance Management (5th)
WithSecure Cloud Security P...
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
49th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is 9.7%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management is 0.0%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Vibhor Goel - PeerSpot reviewer
A single tool for complete visibility and addressing security gaps
Currently, issues are structured in Microsoft Defender for Cloud at severity levels of high, critical, or warning, but these severity levels are not always right. For example, Microsoft might consider a port being open as critical, but that might not be the case for our company. Similarly, it might suggest closing some management ports, but you might need them to be able to log in, so the severity levels for certain things can be improved. Even though Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a way to temporarily disable certain alerts or notifications without affecting our security score, it would be better to have more granularized control over these recommendations. Currently, we cannot even disable certain alerts or notifications. There should be an automated mechanism to design Azure policies based on the recommendations, possibly with AI integration. Instead of an engineer having to write a policy to fix security gaps, which is very time-consuming, there should be an inbuilt capability to auto-remediate everything and have proper control in place. Additionally, enabling Defender for Cloud at the resource group level, rather than only at the subscription level, would be beneficial.
Read full review
PP
Stable, scalable, and can be deployed on both cloud and on-premises
We usually need the solution to have extra protection against data breaches, as we have seen with our customers. The solution is deployed on the public cloud The solution works both outside and on-premises of the company, thus preventing secondary breaches from reaching the company's data. The…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are the insights, meaning the remediation suggestions, as well as the incident alerts."
"The most valuable feature is the hunting feature, which integrates well into the entire Microsoft ecosystem."
"Microsoft Defender for Cloud has significantly enhanced our overall security posture by approximately 20 to 25 percent."
"Defender for Cloud has improved our security posture."
"The main feature is the security posture assessment through the security score. I find that to be very helpful because it gives us guidance on what needs to be secured and recommendations on how to secure the workloads that have been onboarded."
"The security alerts and correlated alerts are most valuable. It correlates the logs and gives us correlated alerts, which can be fed into any security information and event management (SIEM) tool. It is an analyzed correlation tool for monitoring security. It gives us alerts when there is any kind of unauthorized access, or when there is any malfunctioning in multifactor authentication (MFA). If our Azure is connected with Azure Security Center, we get to know what types of authentication are happening in our infra."
"It alerts us to our vulnerabilities and ensures compliance by marking off a compliance tool checklist."
"Defender for Cloud provides a complete DevOps security package for cloud services."
More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pros
"The solution works both outside and on-premises of the company, thus preventing secondary breaches from reaching the company's data."
 

Cons

"The overview provides you with good information, but if you want more details, there is a lot more customization to do, which requires knowledge of the other supporting solutions."
"My experience with Microsoft Defender for Cloud has been largely negative due to a poor user experience."
"The customer service at Microsoft has room for improvement. The first line of support is not technically adept and often requires engaging higher-level technicians to resolve issues."
"We haven't experienced issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud for our company size of about five hundred people. However, I've heard there might be issues with scalability for larger enterprises."
"Another thing that could be improved was that they could recommend processes on how to react to alerts, or recommend best practices based on how other organizations do things if they receive an alert about XYZ."
"For Kubernetes, I was using Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS). To see that whatever is getting deployed into AKS goes through the correct checks and balances in terms of affinities and other similar aspects and follows all the policies, we had to use a product called Stackrox. At a granular level, the built-in policies were good for Kubernetes, but to protect our containers from a coding point of view, we had to use a few other products. For example, from a programming point of view, we were using Checkmarx for static code analysis. For CIS compliance, there are no CIS benchmarks for AKS. So, we had to use other plugins to see that the CIS benchmarks are compliant. There are CIS benchmarks for Kubernetes on AWS and GCP, but there are no CIS benchmarks for AKS. So, Azure Security Center fell short from the regulatory compliance point of view, and we had to use one more product. We ended up with two different dashboards. We had Azure Security Center, and we had Stackrox that had its own dashboard. The operations team and the security team had to look at two dashboards, and they couldn't get an integrated piece. That's a drawback of Azure Security Center. Azure Security Center should provide APIs so that we can integrate its dashboard within other enterprise dashboards, such as the PowerBI dashboard. We couldn't get through these aspects, and we ended up giving Reader security permission to too many people, which was okay to some extent, but when we had to administer the users for the Stackrox portal and Azure Security Center, it became painful."
"Defender could improve how data is represented. It can be unstructured or slow to load."
"Another thing is that Defender for Cloud uses more resources than CrowdStrike, which my current company uses. Defender for Cloud has two or three processes running simultaneously that consume memory and processor time. I had the chance to compare that with CrowdStrike a few days ago, which was significantly less. It would be nice if Defender were a little lighter. It's a relatively large installation that consumes more resources than competitors do."
More Microsoft Defender for Cloud cons
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model for most plans is generally good, but the cost of the new Defender for Storage plan is high and should be revisited, as it could lead to disabling desirable security features due to cost."
"Its pricing is a little bit high in terms of Azure Security Center, but the good thing is that we don't need to maintain and deploy it. So, while the pricing is high, it is native to Azure which is why we prefer using this tool."
"The product's pricing policy is generally favorable."
"They have a free version, but the license for this one isn't too high. It's free to start with, and you're charged for using it beyond 30 days. Some other pieces of Defender are charged based on usage, so you will be charged more for a high volume of transactions. I believe Defender for Cloud is a daily charge based on Azure's App Service Pricing."
"I rate Microsoft Defender a three out of ten for affordability. The price could be a little lower."
"Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters."
"Although I am outside of the discussion on budget and costing, I can say that the importance of security provided by this solution is of such importance that whatever the cost is, it is not a factor."
"This solution is more cost-effective than some competing products. My understanding is that it is based on the number of integrations that you have, so if you have fewer subscriptions then you pay less for the service."
More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pricing and cost advice
"The cost of the solution is mid-ranged but worth the price."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How is Prisma Cloud vs Azure Security Center for security?
Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Defender for Cloud?
The entire Defender Suite is tightly coupled, integrated, and collaborative.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?
The pricing is pretty standard.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Compared 20% of the time
Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Compared 14% of the time
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
Orca Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Orca Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Compared 3% of the time
More Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
May 2025
Microsoft Defender for Cloud reportDownload Microsoft Defender for Cloud product report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
May 2025
WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management reportDownload WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Security Center, Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC, Azure Defender
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Microsoft
Demo not available
WithSecure
 

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.

The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.

Microsoft

Companies rely on WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management to secure cloud infrastructure, manage compliance, and identify misconfigurations, appreciating its real-time monitoring, effective threat detection, and straightforward deployment.

WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management excels in enhancing compliance monitoring, providing detailed visibility into cloud infrastructure, and offering automated remediation. Users value advanced threat detection capabilities and seamless integration with cloud environments. Real-time alerts, customizable reporting, and an intuitive dashboard make security management simpler. Comprehensive analytics help identify vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture, while effective resource management and quick incident response maintain security benchmarks.

What are the key features?
  • Compliance Monitoring: Ensures adherence to security standards.
  • Detailed Visibility: Offers clear insights into cloud infrastructure.
  • Automated Remediation: Fixes issues without manual intervention.
  • Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies and addresses threats promptly.
  • Seamless Integration: Works effortlessly with existing environments.
  • Real-time Alerts: Provides immediate notifications of security issues.
  • Customizable Reporting: Enables tailored reports for specific needs.
  • Intuitive Dashboard: Simplifies overall security management.
  • Comprehensive Analytics: Helps in vulnerability assessment and security improvement.
What benefits and ROI should you look for?
  • Clarity in Vulnerability Assessment: Easily identify security weak points.
  • Automation of Security Practices: Save time with automated procedures.
  • Integration with Workflows: Smoothly fits into current processes.
  • Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes use of resources.
  • Quick Incident Response: Rapidly addresses security incidents.

WithSecure Cloud Security Posture Management is implemented across diverse industries, providing tailored security solutions for financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and more. Companies find it valuable for meeting stringent compliance requirements, streamlining security processes, and protecting sensitive data while ensuring efficient resource use and maintaining robust security postures.

WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
May 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne and others in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM). Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.