Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Securiti comparison

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Read 7 Securiti reviews

492 Views
380 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Securiti are competitors in the domain of cloud security management. Microsoft Defender offers superior integration within the Azure ecosystem, excelling in threat detection while Securiti focuses on data privacy automation and compliance.

Features: Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides robust threat detection with seamless integration in Azure, including advanced threat protection and centralized security management. In comparison, Securiti emphasizes AI-driven data classification, compliance automation, and privacy governance, catering to regulatory and data management needs.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender could enhance cross-platform interoperability and reduce complexity outside the Azure environment. Its user interface might benefit from a more streamlined design. Securiti, on the other hand, may need improvements in scaling AI capabilities and expanding automation features to handle more data types. Additionally, broader support for non-compliance-related tasks could increase its functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender is easily deployed within Azure, supported by extensive Microsoft resources. Securiti offers flexible deployment options and is recognized for its proactive customer support, providing tailored privacy solutions for varied compliance needs.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender benefits from Azure's cost structures, offering competitive pricing and good ROI due to its integration within Microsoft services. Securiti may have higher initial costs but offers a significant ROI by reducing compliance risks through its comprehensive data management and automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Securiti Report (Updated: April 2025).

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Securiti

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (7th), Container Management (9th), Container Security (4th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Microsoft Security Suite (4th), Compliance Management (3rd)

Securiti

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Privacy Management Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is 12.7%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securiti is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

Featured Reviews

Vibhor Goel

Senior Cloud Platform Engineer at Deutsche Börse

A single tool for complete visibility and addressing security gaps

Currently, issues are structured in Microsoft Defender for Cloud at severity levels of high, critical, or warning, but these severity levels are not always right. For example, Microsoft might consider a port being open as critical, but that might not be the case for our company. Similarly, it might suggest closing some management ports, but you might need them to be able to log in, so the severity levels for certain things can be improved. Even though Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a way to temporarily disable certain alerts or notifications without affecting our security score, it would be better to have more granularized control over these recommendations. Currently, we cannot even disable certain alerts or notifications. There should be an automated mechanism to design Azure policies based on the recommendations, possibly with AI integration. Instead of an engineer having to write a policy to fix security gaps, which is very time-consuming, there should be an inbuilt capability to auto-remediate everything and have proper control in place. Additionally, enabling Defender for Cloud at the resource group level, rather than only at the subscription level, would be beneficial.

Read full review

AzhagarasanAnnadorai

Founder at Kaizentric Technologies Private Limited

Automating compliance processes with effective data classification

One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data. For the remaining data, even if it is PII, it may not be classified correctly. This could be due to incorrect or missing data in the dataset. Therefore, I still need to do some manual review to complete the exercise. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Securiti had a feature similar to data mesh, allowing users to directly access remote data through the Securiti UI. This would reduce the need for other tools like Snowflake.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It alerts us to our vulnerabilities and ensures compliance by marking off a compliance tool checklist."

"Most importantly, it's an integrated solution. We not only have Defender for Cloud, but we also have Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Office 365, and Defender for Identity. It's an integrated, holistic solution."

"The most valuable feature is the regulatory compliance aspect, where we utilize predefined initiatives like NIST."

"One important security feature is the incident alerts. Now, with all these cyberattacks, there are a lot of incident alerts that get triggered. It is very difficult to keep monitoring everything automatically, instead our organization is utilizing the automated use case that we get from Microsoft. That has helped bring down the manual work for a lot of things."

"The dashboard is very good. It gives our clients a lot of information and allows them to have a complete overview of the system. Everything is visible in one glance."

"It takes very little effort to integrate it. It also gives very good visibility into what exactly is happening."

"It works seamlessly on the Azure platform because it's a Microsoft app. Its setup is similar, so if you already have a Microsoft account, it just flows into it."

"Good compliance policies."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pros

"The process mapping is a good tool. We have a nice view of their data."

"Data discovery is a fantastic product."

"Overall, I would rate Securiti a nine out of ten."

"Technical support for Securiti is good."

"Their data discovery is a fantastic product."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It's very scalable. I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability."

"The automated way of identifying and classifying personal information is very beneficial."

More Securiti pros

Cons

"Another thing is that Defender for Cloud uses more resources than CrowdStrike, which my current company uses. Defender for Cloud has two or three processes running simultaneously that consume memory and processor time. I had the chance to compare that with CrowdStrike a few days ago, which was significantly less. It would be nice if Defender were a little lighter. It's a relatively large installation that consumes more resources than competitors do."

"Consistency is the area where the most improvement is needed. For example, there are some areas where the UI is not uniform across the board."

"If they had an easier way to display all the vulnerabilities of the machines affected and remediation steps on one screen rather than having to dive deep into each of them, that would be a lot easier."

"Early on, the lack of transparency is a challenge. Microsoft does not tell you the cost when they launch something."

"It's hard to reach someone who understands my problems. I haven't had many issues, so I haven't called them."

"Azure's system could be more on point like AWS support. For example, if I have an issue with AWS, I create a support ticket, then I get a call or a message. With Azure support, you raise a ticket, and somebody calls back depending on their availability and the priority, which might not align with your business priority."

"Sometimes it's very difficult to determine when I need Microsoft Defender for Cloud for a special resource group or a special kind of product."

"The range of workloads is broad, but we'd love to add more workloads and make it a single security solution that covers all those workloads."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud cons

"Technical support needs enhancement. It would be helpful to have better documentation and more accessible support, especially when raising support tickets."

"Technical support can be hit or miss. Some technical staff are great, but others are not very effective. On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten."

"I would like their workflows and assessment automation to be more advanced compared to their competitors, especially under the pro core privacy module."

"While the software is functionally robust and intuitive, there is a challenging learning curve."

"I would like their workflows and assessment automation to be more advanced compared to their competitors, especially under the pro core privacy module."

"Fraud prevention could be improved. If a criminal accesses my system and obtains my information, they might commit fraud."

"It's not very fast, and it's difficult to get an answer."

"The scalability of Securiti is not high because we have to customize the solution. It is very complicated to scale, so it needs improvement."

More Securiti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While we pay for any additional features, the pricing seems competitive, though I am not involved in the specific cost details."

"Security Center charges $15 per resource for any workload that you onboard into it. They charge per VM or per data-base server or per application. It's not like Microsoft 365 licensing, where there are levels like E3 and E5. Security Center is pretty straightforward."

"Pricing depends on your workload size, but it is very cheap. If you're talking about virtual machines, it is $5 or something for each machine, which is minimal. If you go for some agent-based solution for every virtual machine, then you need to pay the same thing or more than that. For an on-premises solution like this, we were paying around $30 to $50 based on size. With Defender, Microsoft doesn't bother about the size. You pay based on the number of machines. So, if you have 10 virtual machines, and 10 virtual machines are being monitored, you are paying based on that rather than the size of the virtual machine. Thus, you are paying for the number of units rather than paying for the size of your units."

"Azure Defender is a bit pricey. The price could be lower."

"There is a helpful cost-reducing option that allows you to integrate production subscriptions with non-production subscriptions."

"Understanding the costs of cloud services can be complicated at first. As with a lot of things in the cloud, it can be quite hard to understand the end cost, but it becomes clearer over time. Early on, the lack of transparency is a challenge. Microsoft does not tell you the cost when they launch something. It is clever marketing, and there is room for improvement there. There should be clarity from the start."

"Defender's basic version is free, which is good. Many of our teams are evaluating the paid version against third-party products."

"Pricing is difficult because each license has its own metrics and cost."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How is Prisma Cloud vs Azure Security Center for security?

Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a...

What do you like most about Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

The entire Defender Suite is tightly coupled, integrated, and collaborative.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

The cost is generally reasonable. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Plan 2 costs $15 per server, per month. For a normal customer with ten to twenty servers, the cost is about $300 per month, which is a...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Securiti?

The pricing varies depending on the year. Two years ago, it was much cheaper, but now it is more expensive.

What needs improvement with Securiti?

I would say to enhance everything because security is becoming more critical. From a human user point of view, it is essential to be aware of the regulation. It is important to optimize security me...

What is your primary use case for Securiti?

I manage Securiti ( /products/securiti-reviews ) for other people. Security is quite important today. My customers use it for data privacy and compliance. Nowadays, it is imperative to be compliant...

AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Orca Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

BigID vs Securiti

Compared 29% of the time

OneTrust Privacy vs Securiti

Compared 21% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Securiti

Compared 20% of the time

Wiz vs Securiti

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs Securiti

Compared 9% of the time

More Securiti Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud product report

Download Securiti product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Security Center, Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC, Azure Defender

No data available

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.

The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.

Microsoft

Securiti is the pioneer of the Data Command Center, a centralized platform that enables the safe use of data and GenAI. It provides unified data intelligence, controls and orchestration across hybrid multicloud environments. Large global enterprises rely on Securiti's Data Command Center for data security, privacy, governance, and compliance.

Securiti has been recognized with numerous industry and analyst awards, including "Most Innovative Startup" by RSA, "Top 25 Machine Learning Startups" by Forbes, "Most Innovative AI Companies" by CB Insights, "Cool Vendor in Data Security" by Gartner, and "Privacy Management Wave Leader" by Forrester.

For more information, please visit Securiti.ai and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Sample Customers

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.

Information Not Available

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Securiti