

Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Securiti are prominent in the cloud security and data privacy management category. Microsoft Defender for Cloud appears to have the edge due to its integration and comprehensive features within the Azure ecosystem.
Features: Microsoft Defender for Cloud enhances security with AI and ML detections, provides compliance policies, and integrates seamlessly with Azure services. Securiti focuses on data privacy with automated tagging, comprehensive dashboards, and international regulation compliance, offering unique features like zero trust architecture and automated classifiers.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender for Cloud users suggest improving documentation, granularity in policies, and third-party integration, with pricing complexities and legacy system support also needing attention. Securiti users look for better automation, workflow capabilities, fraud prevention strategies, and a more comprehensive learning curve.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers various deployment models on the public cloud, with mixed reviews on customer service, especially regarding knowledgeable support. Securiti’s deployment in hybrid environments heavily relies on on-premises and private clouds, with customer support being varied in responsiveness and expertise.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, considered costly by some, uses a pay-as-you-go model providing significant ROI with its security features. Securiti, though more affordable than some rivals, presents variable pricing that might increase over time, with cost estimation challenges for deployment. Both offer potential ROI through enhanced security management, catering to different business needs and budget constraints.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
Compared to not having Microsoft Defender for Cloud in place, we definitely saw an advantage by not having downtime due to a security threat.
With more automation in the SOC and the implementation of the next generation SOC, the headcount required for around-the-clock monitoring of ever increasing IT assets has gone down drastically.
Securiti reduced my manual effort by thirty to forty percent, although my goal is to achieve a hundred percent reduction.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
The team in Asia-Pacific has been particularly supportive and generous with partners, providing comprehensive assistance and material.
On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten.
We've got a dedicated engineer, and when we get someone, we get the answer.
As we have reduced our on-premises infrastructure, it is about how we can migrate workloads to the cloud to make it easier, and then having everything fully encompassed and secured within that area makes it much easier for us to scale as needed and grow.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability.
The tools allow for quick building and testing, reducing overall deployment time.
Securiti's scalability is impressive; it is capable of handling a large workload for a bank having 25,000 plus branches and a customer base of around 400 million customers.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
We manage the environment well, and the clients manage it, so it's not crashing.
Overall, its stability compares well to other products.
The top executive or the C-level executives want to understand the impact of implementing the various cyber security solutions in terms of the reduction, tangible reduction in the business risk.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
It would be beneficial if Securiti had a feature similar to data mesh, allowing users to directly access remote data through the Securiti UI.
It's hard to estimate the cost. They should help with the cost estimation.
Despite them having connectors and ongoing product improvements, there are challenges with data lineage and updating relationships modules that don't match OneTrust's capabilities.
Security has essentially no cost when compared to the cost of a breach.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
Vovalage was more affordable than Securiti.
It's hard to estimate the cost.
Two years ago, it was much cheaper, but now it is more expensive.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
A specific feature I find effective is the sensitive data intelligence (SDA) module, which is very useful for automating compliance processes.
I find the zero trust network, zero trust architecture, ZTA, most valuable and unique in Securiti.
Their data discovery is a fantastic product. It is AI-enabled for automatic tagging and classifiers.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | 8.7% |
| Securiti | 2.9% |
| Other | 88.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
Securiti is the pioneer of the Data Command Center, a centralized platform that enables the safe use of data and GenAI. It provides unified data intelligence, controls and orchestration across hybrid multicloud environments. Large global enterprises rely on Securiti's Data Command Center for data security, privacy, governance, and compliance.
Securiti has been recognized with numerous industry and analyst awards, including "Most Innovative Startup" by RSA, "Top 25 Machine Learning Startups" by Forbes, "Most Innovative AI Companies" by CB Insights, "Cool Vendor in Data Security" by Gartner, and "Privacy Management Wave Leader" by Forrester.
For more information, please visit Securiti.ai and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
We monitor all Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.