Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Rubrik Data Security Posture comparison

Microsoft and Rubrik are both solutions in the Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Rubrik is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 10.9% mindshare in DSPM, compared to Rubrik’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rubrik users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Read 79 Microsoft Defender for Cloud reviews

20,047 Views
5,012 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Rubrik Data Security Posture

Read 1 Rubrik Data Security Posture review

622 Views
622 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Rubrik Data Security Posture

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Rubrik Data Security Posture compete in the cybersecurity space, focusing on cloud protection and data security. Defender for Cloud has an advantage in pricing and support, while Rubrik stands out in features, making it a preferred choice for comprehensive data security capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a unified platform with strengths in threat detection, vulnerability management, and continuous monitoring across Azure environments. Rubrik Data Security Posture offers advanced data protection features, including immutable backups, ransomware protection, and extensive data compliance support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Cloud benefits from seamless integration with Azure services, simplifying deployment for users within that ecosystem and offering structured support channels. Rubrik Data Security Posture provides flexibility with multi-cloud support and streamlined deployment, appealing to diverse IT environments. Rubrik's customer service is praised for its effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Cloud is noted for its cost-effectiveness, with straightforward pricing suitable for Azure-centric organizations. Rubrik Data Security Posture, while initially more costly, offers significant ROI through high-value features like ransomware recovery and data compliance solutions. Its enhanced protective capabilities justify its premium pricing for many.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,089 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (7th), Container Management (9th), Container Security (7th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Microsoft Security Suite (8th), Compliance Management (5th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (2nd)

Rubrik Data Security Posture

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is 10.9%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rubrik Data Security Posture is 1.8%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Defender for Cloud	10.9%
Rubrik Data Security Posture	1.8%
Other	87.3%

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

Featured Reviews

Vibhor Goel

Senior Cloud Platform Engineer at Deutsche Börse

A single tool for complete visibility and addressing security gaps

Currently, issues are structured in Microsoft Defender for Cloud at severity levels of high, critical, or warning, but these severity levels are not always right. For example, Microsoft might consider a port being open as critical, but that might not be the case for our company. Similarly, it might suggest closing some management ports, but you might need them to be able to log in, so the severity levels for certain things can be improved. Even though Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a way to temporarily disable certain alerts or notifications without affecting our security score, it would be better to have more granularized control over these recommendations. Currently, we cannot even disable certain alerts or notifications. There should be an automated mechanism to design Azure policies based on the recommendations, possibly with AI integration. Instead of an engineer having to write a policy to fix security gaps, which is very time-consuming, there should be an inbuilt capability to auto-remediate everything and have proper control in place. Additionally, enabling Defender for Cloud at the resource group level, rather than only at the subscription level, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Neelash Nair

Principle Tech Architect at Unisys

Unified dashboard allows seamless threat detection and management while process for sensitive data needs action capabilities

The features of Rubrik Data Security Posture that I have found most valuable include its better detect function for anomalies and cyber threats, along with immutability by default, operating system hardening, MFA, and all the other ZTNA functions, which align well with our needs. Regarding the anomaly detection feature in Rubrik Data Security Posture, the product has a threat detect function that you can run on-demand or by default to identify anomalies, and allows you to perform deeper analysis using YARA rules or other indicators of compromise to determine if a threat is actual or a false positive. I leverage Rubrik's unified dashboard for proactive threat detection and remediation, which I find absolutely fantastic and unmatched compared to other dashboards, allowing visibility into a hybrid environment on a single pane of glass. The positive impact I've seen from using Rubrik Data Security Posture is its superior detection of threats from primary backups, which is built-in and requires minimal setup compared to other tools that need separate scanning engines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We saw improvement from a regulatory compliance perspective due to having a single dashboard."

"One important security feature is the incident alerts. Now, with all these cyberattacks, there are a lot of incident alerts that get triggered. It is very difficult to keep monitoring everything automatically, instead our organization is utilizing the automated use case that we get from Microsoft. That has helped bring down the manual work for a lot of things."

"Defender for Cloud is an improvement over Trend Micro, our previous solution. We like integrating our endpoints and visualizing everything in one place. It provides comprehensive coverage for endpoints, servers, and overall environmental security."

"Microsoft Defender for Cloud is stable and reliable as advertised."

"The pricing is good."

"The most valuable feature is the regulatory compliance aspect, where we utilize predefined initiatives like NIST. Alert management is another useful feature. Alerts are directly integrated with our email or DevOps board for easy viewing, allowing us to identify problem areas efficiently."

"Threat protection is comprehensive and simple."

"The solution is very easy to deploy."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pros

"I leverage Rubrik's unified dashboard for proactive threat detection and remediation, which I find absolutely fantastic and unmatched compared to other dashboards, allowing visibility into a hybrid environment on a single pane of glass."

Cons

"One of the main challenges that we have been facing with Azure Security Center is the cost. The costs are really a complex calculation, e.g., to calculate the monthly costs. Azure is calculating on an hourly basis for use of the resource. Because of this, we found it really complex to promote what will be our costs for the next couple of months. I think if Azure could reduce the complex calculation and come up with straightforward cost mapping that would be very useful from a product point of view."

"After getting a recommendation, it takes time for the solution to refresh properly to show that the problem has been eliminated."

"I would like to see more connectors and plugins with other platforms."

"I would suggest building a single product that addresses endpoint server protection, attack surface, and everything else in one solution. That is the main disadvantage with the product. If we are incorporating some features, we end up in a situation where this solution is for the server, and that one is for the client, or this is for identity, and that is for our application. They're not bundling it. Commercially, we can charge for different licenses, but on the implementation side, it's tough to help our end-customer understand which product they're getting."

"The customer service at Microsoft has room for improvement. The first line of support is not technically adept and often requires engaging higher-level technicians to resolve issues."

"There needs to be improvement in the security recommendations, particularly in attack path mapping. Sometimes, it misleads users about the real exposure of external-facing assets."

"Customizing some of the compliance requirements based on individual needs seems like the biggest area of improvement. There should be an option to turn specific controls on and off based on how your solution is configured."

"The remediation process could be improved."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud cons

"I assess the effectiveness of Rubrik's sensitive data discovery in my data security strategy as functional but limited, as it identifies sensitive data but lacks clarity on what actions to take next."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is difficult because each license has its own metrics and cost."

"The pricing model for most plans is generally good, but the cost of the new Defender for Storage plan is high and should be revisited, as it could lead to disabling desirable security features due to cost."

"Although I am outside of the discussion on budget and costing, I can say that the importance of security provided by this solution is of such importance that whatever the cost is, it is not a factor."

"Currently, Microsoft offers only one plan at the enterprise level which is $15 per machine."

"Understanding the costs of cloud services can be complicated at first. As with a lot of things in the cloud, it can be quite hard to understand the end cost, but it becomes clearer over time. Early on, the lack of transparency is a challenge. Microsoft does not tell you the cost when they launch something. It is clever marketing, and there is room for improvement there. There should be clarity from the start."

"Pricing depends on your workload size, but it is very cheap. If you're talking about virtual machines, it is $5 or something for each machine, which is minimal. If you go for some agent-based solution for every virtual machine, then you need to pay the same thing or more than that. For an on-premises solution like this, we were paying around $30 to $50 based on size. With Defender, Microsoft doesn't bother about the size. You pay based on the number of machines. So, if you have 10 virtual machines, and 10 virtual machines are being monitored, you are paying based on that rather than the size of the virtual machine. Thus, you are paying for the number of units rather than paying for the size of your units."

"We only use the free tier, so we haven't faced any pricing, setup costs, or licensing challenges."

"Pricing is a consideration, but we strive to keep costs low by enabling only necessary services."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

University

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	45

No data available

Questions from the Community

How is Prisma Cloud vs Azure Security Center for security?

Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

The entire Defender Suite is tightly coupled, integrated, and collaborative.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

The pricing is pretty standard.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rubrik Data Security Posture?

The pricing and licensing cost of Rubrik Data Security Posture can be tricky, as it depends on the relationship you have with your vendor and whether you're an established company or a startup.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rubrik Data Security Posture?

I assess the effectiveness of Rubrik's sensitive data discovery in my data security strategy as functional but limited, as it identifies sensitive data but lacks clarity on what actions to take nex...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rubrik Data Security Posture?

I have been working with Rubrik Data Security Posture since 2016-2017. I have been working with Rubrik Data Security Posture within the last 12 months as well and have about three to four years of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 29% of the time

Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Orca Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

Wiz vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 36% of the time

Cyera vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 25% of the time

Dig vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 24% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 10% of the time

BigID vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 6% of the time

More Rubrik Data Security Posture Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

September 2025

Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

October 2025

Download Rubrik Data Security Posture product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Security Center, Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC, Azure Defender

Laminar

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Rubrik

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.

The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.

Microsoft

Rubrik Data Security Posture provides comprehensive data protection, ensuring robust security measures to protect sensitive information and maintain data integrity.

Targeted at organizations seeking to safeguard their data against threats, Rubrik Data Security Posture offers a reliable framework for data security. It's recognized for its seamless integration and proactive security features, making it essential for industries requiring trust and confidentiality in managing their digital assets.

What features define its capabilities?

Data Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to standards by continuously monitoring data.
Automated Risk Assessment: Identifies vulnerabilities to strengthen security protocols.
Incident Response Automation: Accelerates response to security threats.
Comprehensive Data Encryption: Safeguards data with advanced encryption techniques.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Boosts confidence in data integrity and protection.
Cost Reduction: Mitigates risks, reducing potential financial impact from breaches.
Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces manual tasks, saving time and resources.
Improved Compliance: Supports meeting regulatory requirements effectively.

In healthcare, Rubrik Data Security Posture is implemented to protect patient data while ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations. Financial institutions utilize it to secure sensitive financial data, maintaining confidentiality and integrity. It supports various industries by addressing specific regulatory requirements and minimizes risks associated with data breaches.

Rubrik

Sample Customers

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, Varonis and others in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM). Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.