Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Rubrik Data Security Posture comparison

Microsoft and Rubrik are both solutions in the Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while Rubrik is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 9.9% mindshare in DSPM, compared to Rubrik’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rubrik users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Read 87 Microsoft Defender for Cloud reviews

19,404 Views
4,657 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Rubrik Data Security Posture

Read 1 Rubrik Data Security Posture review

627 Views
627 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Rubrik Data Security Posture

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Rubrik Data Security Posture compete in security and data management. Microsoft Defender for Cloud may appeal more to organizations focused on comprehensive threat protection due to its advanced threat detection and integration with Azure, while Rubrik's robust data recovery and management features are valuable for businesses prioritizing data resilience.

Features: Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers seamless integration with Azure services, threat detection across environments, and wide integration capabilities. Rubrik Data Security Posture provides ransomware recovery, data classification, and comprehensive data management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rubrik Data Security Posture offers a streamlined deployment process and personalized customer support for complex environments. Microsoft Defender for Cloud allows efficient rollout across cloud services, integrating tightly with Azure.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers cost-effective pricing for Azure users, delivering significant ROI through integrated security solutions. Rubrik Data Security Posture, although potentially higher in upfront costs, provides substantial ROI through advanced data management capabilities and reduced recovery times.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (6th), Container Management (7th), Container Security (7th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Microsoft Security Suite (7th), Compliance Management (4th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (2nd)

Rubrik Data Security Posture

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is 9.9%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rubrik Data Security Posture is 2.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Defender for Cloud	9.9%
Rubrik Data Security Posture	2.0%
Other	88.1%

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

Featured Reviews

David Birhange

Director, Cloud and Modern Workplace at Informanix Technology Group

Brings together cloud security insights through a unified view and supports agentless protection for virtual machines

Copilot and similar features are already being used, though not necessarily for Microsoft Defender for Cloud specifically. We are trying to get more experience before rolling out most of Microsoft Defender for Cloud's AI capabilities. This is definitely on our to-do list, and the priority is urgent as we seek to learn more about these capabilities. The GenAI threat protection from Microsoft Defender for Cloud has not been enabled yet. There are many unknowns with AI applications. AI agents will operate while you're not present, whether you are sleeping or awake, and it's unclear whether there would be any exfiltration of data or how data is being managed. Microsoft Purview is being used extensively, and there is significant development going on with DSPM that will be rolled out to address security concerns. Data labeling and proper demarcation for sensitivity of data before it is received are being actively pursued.

Read full review

Neelash Nair

Principle Tech Architect at Unisys

Unified dashboard allows seamless threat detection and management while process for sensitive data needs action capabilities

The features of Rubrik Data Security Posture that I have found most valuable include its better detect function for anomalies and cyber threats, along with immutability by default, operating system hardening, MFA, and all the other ZTNA functions, which align well with our needs. Regarding the anomaly detection feature in Rubrik Data Security Posture, the product has a threat detect function that you can run on-demand or by default to identify anomalies, and allows you to perform deeper analysis using YARA rules or other indicators of compromise to determine if a threat is actual or a false positive. I leverage Rubrik's unified dashboard for proactive threat detection and remediation, which I find absolutely fantastic and unmatched compared to other dashboards, allowing visibility into a hybrid environment on a single pane of glass. The positive impact I've seen from using Rubrik Data Security Posture is its superior detection of threats from primary backups, which is built-in and requires minimal setup compared to other tools that need separate scanning engines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UX and UI are very good. Users have more of a taste for Microsoft UI."

"The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security. It has made the cloud environment more secure, thanks to all the recommendations we can get."

"The entire Defender Suite is tightly coupled, integrated, and collaborative."

"The feature of Microsoft Defender for Cloud that I appreciate most is the ability to view logs of applications, as I find it much clearer to understand what is running."

"It's quite a good product. It helps to understand the infections and issues you are facing."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the vulnerability assessments and the glossary of compliance."

"The most valuable features offer the latest threat detection and response capabilities."

"The solution's robust security posture is the most valuable feature."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pros

"I leverage Rubrik's unified dashboard for proactive threat detection and remediation, which I find absolutely fantastic and unmatched compared to other dashboards, allowing visibility into a hybrid environment on a single pane of glass."

Cons

"Integration into other third-party products, particularly those from tier three vendors like ManageEngine and Hexcode, has proven difficult."

"With the new Copilot functionality available everywhere, it is challenging to pinpoint areas for improvement. If I put in a lot of thought, I might identify things, but right now, nothing significant pops into my mind, but there is always room for more transparency, especially in pricing."

"Microsoft does a fairly good job, but many products are developed from an engineer's perspective rather than the end user perspective, making the intuitive flow of the interface sometimes less than optimal."

"Agent features need to be improved. They support agents through Azure Arc or Workbench. Sometimes, we are not able to get correct signals from the machines on which we have installed these agents. We are not able to see how many are currently reporting to Azure Security Center, and how many are currently not reporting. For example, we have 1,000 machines, and we have enrolled 1,000 OMS agents on these machines to collect the log. When I look at the status, even though at some places, it shows that it is connected, but when I actually go and check, I'm not getting any alerts from those. There are some discrepancies on the agent, and the agent features are not up to the mark."

"Although Microsoft Defender for Cloud is based on security, I wish it went beyond providing assessments, reports, and generic steps. More detailed procedures would be helpful, especially for lower-level support staff."

"Consistency is the area where the most improvement is needed. For example, there are some areas where the UI is not uniform across the board."

"No possibility to write or edit any capability."

"One of the main challenges that we have been facing with Azure Security Center is the cost. The costs are really a complex calculation, e.g., to calculate the monthly costs. Azure is calculating on an hourly basis for use of the resource. Because of this, we found it really complex to promote what will be our costs for the next couple of months. I think if Azure could reduce the complex calculation and come up with straightforward cost mapping that would be very useful from a product point of view."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud cons

"I assess the effectiveness of Rubrik's sensitive data discovery in my data security strategy as functional but limited, as it identifies sensitive data but lacks clarity on what actions to take next."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing is a little bit high in terms of Azure Security Center, but the good thing is that we don't need to maintain and deploy it. So, while the pricing is high, it is native to Azure which is why we prefer using this tool."

"The solution is expensive, and I rate it a five to six out of ten."

"The product's pricing policy is generally favorable."

"They have a free version, but the license for this one isn't too high. It's free to start with, and you're charged for using it beyond 30 days. Some other pieces of Defender are charged based on usage, so you will be charged more for a high volume of transactions. I believe Defender for Cloud is a daily charge based on Azure's App Service Pricing."

"The pricing is very difficult because every type of Defender for Cloud has its own metrics and pricing. If you have Cloud for Key Vault, the pricing is different than it is for storage. Every type has its own pricing list and rules."

"The cost of the license is based on the subscriptions that you have."

"Azure Defender is a bit pricey. The price could be lower."

"Our clients complain about the cost of Microsoft Defender for Cloud."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

University

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

No data available

Questions from the Community

How is Prisma Cloud vs Azure Security Center for security?

Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Microsoft Defender for Cloud was pretty straightforward. We did have a consultation with a third party to go over different tiers and produ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

Microsoft Defender for Cloud can be improved. An additional feature that should be included in the next release is Zero Trust, similar to ThreatLocker software.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rubrik Data Security Posture?

The pricing and licensing cost of Rubrik Data Security Posture can be tricky, as it depends on the relationship you have with your vendor and whether you're an established company or a startup.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rubrik Data Security Posture?

I assess the effectiveness of Rubrik's sensitive data discovery in my data security strategy as functional but limited, as it identifies sensitive data but lacks clarity on what actions to take nex...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rubrik Data Security Posture?

I have been working with Rubrik Data Security Posture since 2016-2017. I have been working with Rubrik Data Security Posture within the last 12 months as well and have about three to four years of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 37% of the time

Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Orca Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

Wiz vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 32% of the time

Cyera vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 25% of the time

Dig vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 19% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Rubrik Data Security Posture

Compared 9% of the time

More Rubrik Data Security Posture Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

December 2025

Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

December 2025

Download Rubrik Data Security Posture product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Security Center, Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC, Azure Defender

Laminar

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Rubrik

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.

The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.

Microsoft

Rubrik Data Security Posture provides comprehensive data protection, ensuring robust security measures to protect sensitive information and maintain data integrity.

Targeted at organizations seeking to safeguard their data against threats, Rubrik Data Security Posture offers a reliable framework for data security. It's recognized for its seamless integration and proactive security features, making it essential for industries requiring trust and confidentiality in managing their digital assets.

What features define its capabilities?

Data Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to standards by continuously monitoring data.
Automated Risk Assessment: Identifies vulnerabilities to strengthen security protocols.
Incident Response Automation: Accelerates response to security threats.
Comprehensive Data Encryption: Safeguards data with advanced encryption techniques.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Boosts confidence in data integrity and protection.
Cost Reduction: Mitigates risks, reducing potential financial impact from breaches.
Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces manual tasks, saving time and resources.
Improved Compliance: Supports meeting regulatory requirements effectively.

In healthcare, Rubrik Data Security Posture is implemented to protect patient data while ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations. Financial institutions utilize it to secure sensitive financial data, maintaining confidentiality and integrity. It supports various industries by addressing specific regulatory requirements and minimizes risks associated with data breaches.

Rubrik

Sample Customers

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, Varonis and others in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM). Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.