Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Database Backup Service
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Akram Zabat - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides versatile data storage solutions with a simple setup and easy to use
It's similar to S3 for AWS. The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial. For example, you can transform data from relational databases, flatten it, and store it in Object storage to save space within the databases. If I want to save data and do not require legacy access, it's a good solution, for instance, to migrate archives from databases to Object storage. This can also be used for business intelligence purposes. Having a storage solution for data makes it the best place to store it. Azure has its own solution for StatsQ Web Apps.
Hossein Nezamabadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an easy setup process and good technical support services
We use Oracle Database Backup Service to manage incremental, differential, and cumulative backups The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality. We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups. We have been using Oracle…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"The most valuable feature is the cost value, which is very important for long term retention."
"The file retention and object retention have been most valuable."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides a platform for uploading or downloading big datasets."
"We can easily create a storage layer in any system."
"For security solutions in Microsoft Azure, I particularly appreciate Microsoft Azure AI foundation."
"This product is very reliable and all of the security that our client requires is available."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"It's a scalable product."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The interface is good."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
 

Cons

"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"One potential area for improvement is the replication process."
"The cost of support is always expensive."
"The deployment process needs improvement, and it requires a lot of expertise to use and to utilize it."
"We have experienced a data copy bottleneck with the AZ copy using Microsoft Azure Object Storage, this should improve. It has high CPU consumption. There are a couple of ways to copy files fast, we have tried a few ways. Other than AZ copy, we can use Azure Fluent Storage, which also takes a lot of time to copy files. The AZ copy is faster but it takes a lot of time and CPU operations."
"The solution's stability should be improved."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs to improve stability and cloud user interface."
"The downloading of high volume data and scalability processes face performance issues related to high data volumes."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is not expensive."
"The pricing can be improved. There is an yearly licensing cost for the solution. There are some reserve instances that are additional to the licensing cost."
"The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"Additional costs depend on the data and complexity of the project."
"Currently, it is a flexible price policy."
"The tool's licensing costs are annual. It should be made reasonable."
"The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model...There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing costs since the price is based on the storage you consume."
"The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."
"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
"The platform is expensive."
"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."
"The platform is expensive."
"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Retailer
9%
Insurance Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is cheaper compared to other competitors, such as Google or third-party solutions, which easily engages customers. They also get multiple servic...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The improvement needed for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is to reduce the transactional charges, as these read and write operation charges are higher. If reduced, we could engage more customers. M...
What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?
From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?
The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.
What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?
The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.