We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use the product for storage, documentation, and reporting."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is flexible and has all the features we need."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"It is a stable solution and serve our purposes"
"Object Storage's best feature is that it's easy to deploy."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure."
"Versioning is a valuable feature."
"The product has good accessibility."
"It's a scalable product."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"The interface is good."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward. It would be best if you had a little bit of training or an understanding of the concepts. It's important because if you don't do that, then you might end up not following the best practices. Then you will learn it the hard way by making mistakes and then know that you shouldn't have done this or that. It's better to attend workshops and take a hands-on approach."
"Our current Azure setup faces challenges with API connectivity, particularly due to misconfigurations related to changes in Azure Graph."
"The setup process could always be a bit easier."
"I would like to see a reduction in pricing so that they can be more competitive."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs to improve stability and cloud user interface."
"The product is expensive."
"One of the things that are currently important is consistency. To achieve this, another database called Cosmos DB is available. We want to have a similar consistency to the one in Cosmos DB but at a cheaper price."
"Object re-use should be improved in order to get better performance and reduce the cost."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 43 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Easy to query, offers great security, and integrates well with other Microsoft applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
