We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure App Service and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, ServiceNow and others in Rapid Application Development Software."This solution is easy to deploy."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure App Service are its vertical and horizontal scaling, along with its ability to throw a docker image."
"Azure data factory is a good tool."
"The program is stable and we've had no technical issues so far."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is customization. It provides the building block from its modularity. You can add what you need with the appropriate code."
"The product is scalable."
"The solution is very simple to set up."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"Can be improved by increasing the number of data centres worldwide."
"In terms of room for improvement, ease of deployment would be an area that needs some focus. Azure does provide out-of-the-box deployment features, but I found that deploying to an App Service instance can be better in terms of more tools that could be available to perform a deployment."
"Sometimes customer service and support can be challenging."
"Customers love it when a solution is affordable, but with Microsoft Azure App Service, you can start and stop it, and when you stop it, it won't be reachable and it won't be available, yet you're still being charged for it. You'll still be charged even if the solution isn't accessible because Microsoft Azure App Service runs on a shared virtual machine that keeps on running, so if there's a way to work this out, it'll be a great improvement to only pay for what you use. The solution should have no hidden cost and no extra charge when it's stopped. This is what needs improvement in Microsoft Azure App Service."
"I would like to see some significant improvement in the technical support provision for this solution."
"In terms of improvement, the technical support could be better."
"The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them."
"There are no issues with the solution."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 8th in Rapid Application Development Software with 38 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Pega BPM and Appian, whereas Pillir is most compared with .
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.