Microsoft Azure API Management vs Red Hat Integration comparison

Microsoft and Red Hat are both solutions in the API Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9, while Red Hat is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 16.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to Red Hat’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 82 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

16,995 Views
16,995 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Red Hat Integration

Read 2 Red Hat Integration reviews

125 Views
125 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

Red Hat Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure API Management and Red Hat Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Red Hat Integration Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Red Hat Integration

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Integration

Ranking in API Management

33rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 16.5%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Integration is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure API Management	16.5%
Red Hat Integration	0.1%
Other	83.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Allan Møller

Consult Manager at Conscia

Transforms internal APIs with secure, manageable cloud compatibility

Microsoft Azure API Management could be improved by enhancing the preview feature, specifically the workspaces. The feature should allow for better delegation of permissions to specific groups without affecting others. The service is extensive and expensive, and this added flexibility would make it more manageable and less prone to errors.

Read full review

CHEW YONG

Principle Solution Architect at beans

Facilitates seamless integration while offering room for OpenShift flexibility

I am still a reseller for IBM products today. I focus on integration solutions. For integration, my clients are using CP4I. For CP4I, I'm using ACE-S, API Connect, and MQ. These are the three products I'm selling from IBM. My clients are using IBM App Connect on-premises. I basically sell open source, specifically Red Hat Integration for integration purposes. Red Hat Integration is part of the Red Hat Integration bundle, which includes two different software solutions bundled together with Red Hat. It's bundled with the OpenShift plus the foundation. I am a Principal Solution Architect. I would be available for them to reach out by email for any questions or comments regarding my review. I want to be a reference for them. I rate Red Hat Integration an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to use compared to other products. It's easy to set up."

"It is easy to use."

"It’s easy to set up."

"Microsoft Azure API Management is 90 to 99 percent scalable. We have three instances running in parallel."

"The most valuable feature is its role as a linchpin in AI Hub architecture, enhancing data handling."

"The ease of use of the solution is excellent."

"It's easier to use and has more features than Google."

"The API management and the hosting of the API platform are great."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"Real-time event streaming is good because you can do real-time data insight, monitor any event that happens, take the action, and provide a real-time dashboard based on certain data."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat Integration lie in its ease of customization for business needs and the flexibility to design workflows according to specific requirements."

Cons

"The licensing part of Microsoft is always higher than other platforms, like Amazon services and other cloud services."

"Security could be improved."

"This solution is only available as a cloud-based deployment and it would be very helpful to have an on-premises version."

"Technical support could be more helpful and responsive."

"The API gateway can be very complex."

"It would be better if it were easier to transition to Azure from JIRA. For example, different nomenclature must be performed when you shift to Azure from JIRA. JIRA's storage, tasks, and ethics are treated differently from Azure. Here they might become functions, which is not an option in JIRA because that nomenclature difference is there. If someone has to get into the nomenclature, then there can be different tasks from clients, and here, they may be treated as functions. JIRA has sub-tasks, but sub-tasks don't exist in Azure. The nomenclature and the linking between ethics and a function and a story are different, and people may have to learn to adapt to the new nomenclature."

"Azure API Management could be improved with better integration with all of Microsoft's tools."

"I would like to see more security features become available."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"The performance of a few computations for the message broker version could be more stable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing between three and four, as it could be more competitive."

"The licensing fees are expensive."

"Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS. There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time."

"Since everyone is isocentric here, it is reasonable for me."

"Azure's pricing is very competitive compared to platforms like Apigee and MuleSoft."

"It is an expensive solution, but any API solution will be expensive."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The price is comparable."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive platform and not suitable for small companies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	52

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Integration?

The most valuable features of Red Hat Integration lie in its ease of customization for business needs and the flexibility to design workflows according to specific requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Integration?

It is an expensive platform and not suitable for small companies. It costs around $30,000 for standard support services and lacks flexibility.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Integration?

The disadvantage of Red Hat Integration is that it has to be tightly coupled to the OpenShift platform, so I couldn't run it on any platform other than OpenShift.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 52% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 14% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

September 2025

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

October 2025

Download Red Hat Integration product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

Red Hat Integration is a comprehensive platform that facilitates agile integration, connecting applications, data, and devices. Designed for developers and enterprises, it offers modern integration features to streamline operations and enhance connectivity.

Red Hat Integration provides an efficient solution for creating and managing integrations with its robust tools and services. It supports modern IT environments, promoting collaboration and reducing complexity with its open-source technology. Key features like messaging, transformation, and service orchestration empower businesses to implement flexible integration strategies seamlessly.

What are the key features of Red Hat Integration?

Messaging: Connects applications through various messaging patterns for scalable data exchange.
Data Transformation: Enables efficient data processing across diverse systems.
API Management: Offers comprehensive API control and security measures.
Service Orchestration: Integrates multiple services to create cohesive processes.
Event-Driven Architecture: Supports responsive application design through real-time events.

What benefits and ROI should you consider?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines integration processes, saving time and resources.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business demands with ease.
Flexibility: Provides multiple integration methods to suit different needs.
Cost Savings: Reduces operational costs by leveraging open-source solutions.

Red Hat Integration finds its application in industries like finance and healthcare, where it plays a vital role in secure data processing and compliance management. Its flexibility and scalable architecture make it a preferred choice for enterprises aiming to enhance their digital capabilities through efficient system integration.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Red Hat Integration

September 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Red Hat Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Red Hat Integration and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Red Hat Integration report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.