IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Micro Focus Silk Central vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

Micro Focus Silk Central vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Use Micro Focus Silk Central?
Fred Niederberger
Easy and very flexible usage. Provides a good picture of your progress and useful for a huge number of test scripts....
Without Panaya, it will be difficult to manage a large number of test scripts. It can be a mess to manage them in a spreadsheet or a document, and... Read more →
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
April 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

    • More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?
    Top Answer: 
    The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panaya Test Dynamix?
    Top Answer: 
    It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?
    Top Answer: 
    The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    21st
    out of 35 in Test Management Tools
    Views
    624
    Comparisons
    363
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 35 in Test Management Tools
    Views
    1,260
    Comparisons
    551
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,755
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
    Learn More
    Micro Focus
    Panaya
    Overview
    Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

    Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

    With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

    Offer
    Learn more about Micro Focus Silk Central
    Learn More
    Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
    Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Transportation Company25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Silk Central is ranked 21st in Test Management Tools while Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Micro Focus Silk Central is rated 0.0, while Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "Easy and very flexible usage. Provides a good picture of your progress and useful for a huge number of test scripts. Licensing model and the Panaya recorder installation can be improved". Micro Focus Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and TestRail by Gurock, whereas Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Selenium HQ.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.