Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs Opsview comparison

Juniper and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #53 with an average rating of 9.0, while ITRS is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0. Juniper holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

1,539 Views
1,462 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Opsview

Read 25 Opsview reviews

5,167 Views
3,617 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Opsview

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Opsview and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in IT monitoring and network management. Marvis appears to have the upper hand with its advanced AI-driven network insights and proactive issue resolution.

Features: Opsview provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable dashboards, and integration with enterprise systems. Marvis offers AI-driven insights, natural language processing for troubleshooting, and automation features.

Room for Improvement: Opsview could enhance its AI capabilities and proactive problem-solving and improve natural language processing. Marvis could benefit from improved pricing transparency, expanded on-premises deployment options, and enhanced traditional monitoring features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview offers both on-premises and cloud deployment models, providing flexibility in infrastructure management. Its robust customer service includes tailored support. Marvis focuses on cloud-native AI-enhanced deployment with quick setup and intuitive operation, alongside streamlined onboarding and automated assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview is known for an accessible pricing model with scalable packages that cater to various business sizes, potentially offering quicker ROI through lower upfront costs. Marvis, despite possibly having a higher price point, provides significant long-term ROI by reducing manual network management tasks and improving operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Opsview Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Opsview

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

53rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Opsview

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (20th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (33rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opsview is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.0%
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.4%
Other	98.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."

"Excellent customer support from Cerner."

"Afterwards, they were impressed by how easy monitoring could be, and they no longer had to edit large text files in order to configure hosts and service checks."

"The fully-extensible event handling has enabled us to reduce on-call incidents by more than 90%."

"I like its scalability thanks to slaves, as you can add as many as you want, which also allows you to reach and monitor devices running on the network that are not accessible by the master."

"The system is very robust and very rarely breaks."

"We now have a single view for all systems monitored within our IT estate, while we previously had three different systems (each configured differently)."

"For me, scalability and reliability are the product's most valuable features."

More Opsview pros

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"Large Opsview setups come with high licensing fees."

"Maybe the graphical representation can be improved. It can be enhanced for better visualization. It could be a little better. And the graph center can be improved."

"It can be a little bit flaky with the agent on VMware."

"SNMP traps management to be improved."

"Reload time: Although there have been major gains in the time to process reloads, I think that there is still room for improvement in this area."

"Pricing and a few certain aspects in the solution needs to be improved."

"We have had some stability issues, but that is largely because we're using an unsupported database."

"Some of the graphics on Opsview could be improved."

More Opsview cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 21% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 13% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 8% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 11% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

June 2026

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

Opsview

June 2026

Download Opsview product report

Also Known As

No data available

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

Overview

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant delivers AI-driven solutions for network management, providing intelligent insights and automation to drive operational efficiency and enhance user experience.

Marvis uses machine learning and natural language processing to offer seamless network operations. It contextualizes issues, automates support tasks, and provides actionable insights to help IT teams make informed decisions. This leads to improved network performance and reliability, fostering a proactive approach in managing network environments.

What are the key features of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

AI-driven Insights: Leverages AI to analyze network data and identify patterns, helping in quick issue resolution.
Natural Language Processing: Simplifies user interactions by interpreting natural language queries.
Automated Support: Automates common network tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Contextual Recommendations: Provides suggestions based on network context and usage patterns.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Automation reduces the need for extensive IT resources.
Enhanced User Experience: Quick issue detection and resolution improve network reliability.
Informed Decision Making: Actionable insights help in strategic network planning.
Increased Efficiency: Automation and AI streamline network management tasks, saving time.

Industries such as healthcare and education implement Marvis Virtual Network Assistant to ensure secure, reliable connectivity. In healthcare, it supports essential communication and patient data management, while in education, it ensures seamless access to digital learning platforms, optimizing both environments effectively.

Juniper

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Opsview

June 2026

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Opsview

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Opsview and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Opsview report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.