Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NetCrunch comparison

Juniper and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #46 with an average rating of 9.0, while AdRem Software is ranked #85. Juniper holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

222 Views
140 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

345 Views
272 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NetCrunch and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant are competitors in the network management and automation domain. Marvis edges ahead with its advanced AI capabilities, offering innovation and efficiency that appeal to tech-forward users.

Features:NetCrunch is acclaimed for its comprehensive network monitoring abilities, user-friendly setup, and customizable dashboards. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant provides AI-driven insights, proactive troubleshooting, and dynamic network automation, setting a futuristic tone with its advanced feature set.

Room for Improvement:NetCrunch could improve its cloud integration, extend its AI functionalities, and simplify some features for less technical users. Marvis might enhance ease of use for non-specialized users, expand integration options with third-party tools, and offer more customization in its automation processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers straightforward deployment with cloud-based adaptability, supported by dedicated service channels, streamlining integration into existing systems. NetCrunch, while providing robust customer support, involves more complexity due to its on-premise architecture, potentially challenging for rapid deployment.

Pricing and ROI:NetCrunch presents a cost-effective solution with scalable pricing based on network size, promoting favorable returns on investment with its competitive pricing. Marvis, with higher initial costs, delivers superior long-term ROI by minimizing manual network management efforts through automation, justifying its initial investment with enhanced operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NetCrunch

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,042 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetCrunch

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

85th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (26th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (63rd), Log Management (77th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Reginald Pierre

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 34% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 26% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 23% of the time

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 17% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 52% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 25% of the time

Nagios Core vs NetCrunch

Compared 23% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

NetCrunch is the complete network monitoring solution for monitoring traffic, topology, devices, systems, logs, and services. It's policy, and template-based configuration makes managing thousands of nodes a breeze. It automatically generates layer-2 maps and manages monitoring dependencies. NetCrunch supports major operating systems, virtualization platforms, and the Cloud. Complete SNMP support with 8,700+ MIBs included and a built-in MIB compiler.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NetCrunch

April 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.