Sophos Network Access Control vs macmon Network Access Control comparison

macmon secure and Sophos are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. macmon secure is ranked #13, while Sophos is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2. macmon secure holds a 2.8% mindshare in NAC, compared to Sophos’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of macmon secure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Sophos users who would recommend it.

macmon Network Access Control

Read 3 macmon Network Access Control reviews

1,322 Views
1,322 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 23 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,001 Views
971 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

macmon Network Access Control

Sophos Network Access Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Sophos Network Access Control and macmon Network Access Control compete in network security. Although Sophos excels in pricing and support, macmon's advanced features make it a better choice for those focused on functionality and long-term value.

Features: Sophos Network Access Control provides robust threat prevention, scalable solutions, and intuitive configuration. macmon Network Access Control offers advanced compliance management, extensive integration options, and dynamic network visibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Sophos is straightforward due to simplified processes and thorough documentation. Its customer service is responsive and efficient. macmon offers detailed deployment flexibility but may require more integration effort. Their customer service is comprehensive, supporting complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos Network Access Control presents competitive setup costs and clear ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. macmon may have higher initial costs but provides superior long-term value through enhanced features and network optimization, indicating higher ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Sophos Network Access Control vs. macmon Network Access Control Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control vs. macmon Network Access Control

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

macmon Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of macmon Network Access Control is 2.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 1.8%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sophos Network Access Control	1.8%
macmon Network Access Control	2.8%
Other	95.4%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Yusuf Oezeren

Senior System Engineer at MOD IT GmbH

A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network

The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly. The interface is user-friendly but, for example, when we have new people starting to work, they never work with NetOne and it is a bit hard to expand in certain places. In addition, when I have to pull the last corrected MAC address, I need to put the space between it in order to find the address. If I don't put it in there, I don't get any resources. This needs improvement. They should maybe add integration with LanSuite. We can include it to see the direct information we get from our LAN Tree. If I click on the MAC address, I will then directly get the hostname, and that will open a tap-in line so I see what the last update was.

Read full review

HirenPatel2

Manager at rspl

Have faced delays in support despite strong multi-layer policy configuration

I have observed some disadvantages as we have experienced one particular problem. We were facing an issue of synchronization of the endpoint with our firewall with help on a cloud for heartbeat syncing. However, it was not syncing as per our requirement. The user has to connect our firewall with the help of VPN. We were supposed to assume a solution on a cloud, which has good synchronization on a cloud with Sophos Central. It will sync with our firewall as well with the help of Sophos Central. Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control. We have to connect with VPN. We are expecting that if we have already installed an endpoint on our system and it is connected to the internet, then it must be synchronized on a cloud with Sophos Central. Through Sophos Central, it must connect with our firewall. If the endpoint is configured on Sophos Central and the firewall is also configured in Sophos Central, then there should be no need to connect to VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."

"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."

"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."

"Sophos' technical support is great, very fast and responsive, and they always know how to fix the problem."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Sophos Network Access Control saves our clients time and money."

"The platform's most valuable features include robust reporting and analytics capabilities, which provide deep insights into our sales performance and customer behavior."

"Sophos has helped us to save time and money and to better manage web activities. It has also helped us to reduce misuse of the network and restrict hacking attempts."

"The installation is very straightforward."

"The pricing is very reasonable and you can negotiate on the price."

"The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

Cons

"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."

"The service macmon offers is already great."

"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."

"What needs to be improved on is the fact that Sophos consumes a lot of processor resources and, once it starts scanning, the RAM utilization is very high."

"It would be beneficial to consider some improvements regarding the dashboard."

"The solution could increase the integration with other platforms or other systems. This would be very useful."

"I would like more details on the incoming connection, like what is the download speed and how it fluctuates. If Sophos can give that information, it would be really good."

"Sophos Network Access Control could be improved by having an ASIC chip similar to FortiNAC, as this would provide better processing for big organizations."

"The solution can improve the for applying policies. They can be complex depending don't the group they are applied to."

"Users are not controlled by role-based access; it's basically device-based control. The definition of role-based control is a little vague here because on the cloud level, it regulates access rather than tasks."

"Sophos Network Access Control requires a lot of resources to work, which is an area for improvement. Pricing could also be improved because it's costly."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

"It is quite expensive."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Sophos Network Access Control?

Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

I am not able to say much on the financial specifics as it pertains to the sales unit.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

A point for improvement for Sophos Network Access Control would be to implement a SIEM tool functionality. For example, CrowdStrike is direct competition to Sophos Network Access Control, not even ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 24% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 21% of the time

Forescout Platform vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 7% of the time

More macmon Network Access Control Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 34% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 24% of the time

Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 11% of the time

Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 10% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

macmon Network Access Control

September 2025

Download macmon Network Access Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

September 2025

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Also Known As

macmon NAC

No data available

Overview

With macmon Network Access Control you always know which devices are connected to your network and where. It provides profound protection for your corporate network and is a centralized security authority that protects your network against intrusion from unauthorized devices, and ensures the complete overview of all your devices.

UFOs (unknown frightening objects) are a thing of the past, as all your devices such as PCs, printers, laptops, medical and technical devices are identified at any time, efficiently monitored and protected against unauthorized access. Guest and employee devices (BYOD) can be easily and securely authorized via the macmon guest service using dynamic management of network segmentation.

To protect your network against unauthorized access, macmon provides two efficient product bundles as well as additional Add-Ons.

Find out more:
- macmon NAC Bundles
- macmon NAC features

macmon secure

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sophos

Sample Customers

More than 1,500 installations in all over Europe in all industries: Stepchange, Volkswagen, Vivantes Healthcare, MBDA Weapons, APS engineering, Alfred Ritter GmbH (Ritter Sport), Haßberg-Kliniken, 1. FSV Mainz 05 eV., Siempelkamp, AEB etc.

Rushmoor Borough Council

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control vs. macmon Network Access Control

September 2025

Free Report: Sophos Network Access Control vs. macmon Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos Network Access Control vs. macmon Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sophos Network Access Control vs. macmon Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.