OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs mabl comparison

mabl and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. mabl is ranked #35, while OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7. mabl holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

mabl

993 Views
477 Comparison Views

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,835 Views
1,395 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

mabl

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab and mabl compete in the mobile and web testing solutions market. mabl has the upper hand with its feature richness and user satisfaction, offering a compelling value proposition.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab excels in handling complex testing scenarios, providing robust testing features, high flexibility, and supporting both mobile and web applications. mabl offers an integrated intelligent test automation platform focusing on self-healing automation, auto-scaling, and flow execution, enhancing productivity and offering advanced technological capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides comprehensive support with flexible configuration options for smooth integration into existing systems. mabl’s cloud-native approach ensures quick deployment with minimal configuration and is paired with responsive customer support, providing a seamless user experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab has a higher initial setup cost but offers significant long-term ROI benefits, especially for complex enterprise environments. mabl has a lower entry cost with faster ROI realization, making it appealing for organizations that prioritize cost-effective and immediate benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,664 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

mabl

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

35th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (16th), API Testing Tools (13th), Test Automation Tools (23rd)

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of mabl is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
mabl	0.9%
Other	97.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Use mabl?

Leave a review

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs mabl

Compared 15% of the time

Functionize vs mabl

Compared 13% of the time

Testim vs mabl

Compared 12% of the time

Endtest vs mabl

Compared 9% of the time

More mabl Competitors

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download mabl product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for Agile teams. It’s the only SaaS solution that tightly integrates automated end-to-end testing into the entire development lifecycle. With mabl creating, executing, and maintaining reliable tests has never been easier, allowing software teams to increase test coverage, speed up development and improve application quality.

mabl

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Arch Insurance Group, Internet Travel Solutions, CareerBuilder, LOB, Building Engines, MaestroQA, TeamLeader, Piece of Cake

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, BrowserStack, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.