Lumu vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response comparison

Lumu Technologies and WithSecure are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Lumu Technologies is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while WithSecure is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Lumu Technologies holds a 1.3% mindshare in XDR, compared to WithSecure’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lumu Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,747 Views
1,188 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 7 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response reviews

989 Views
504 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lumu

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lumu and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Lumu vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lumu

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

17th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (9th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (7th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

32nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (41st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Lumu is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Lumu	1.3%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response	0.7%
Other	98.0%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Dashboard offers comprehensive views with efficient system updates and integration

There is one significant issue with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response. For computers with limited RAM, such as 16 gigabytes, the software is not optimal as it requires between four to six gigabytes of RAM to run. I don't use the Threat Intelligence feature from WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response as it requires extra activation, which I have not implemented.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"I use the solution to protect our infrastructure. The tool has special frames for banking. There is an additional secure filter for banking-related pages. It protects me from viruses, malware, and attacks."

"The only issue that we have today is with false positives. We have too many false positives with the solution."

"WithSecure includes an encrypted drive that stores a key for accessing the encrypted data."

"It offers good scalability."

"The integration and user interface of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response are effective, with a comprehensive dashboard that allows users to quickly identify and address problems, add computers, and send system updates."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The product is stable."

Cons

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"The reports need improvement."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"The monthly reporting feature of WithSecure can be improved."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is scalable. My company has 800-1000 customers."

"Its automated functionality could be better."

"The tool’s mobile version needs to be improved."

"The website rules are too complicated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"I rate WithSecure a four out of ten because it's quite economical."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. Its pricing is competitive."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response's licensing costs are yearly."

"The solution's price is moderate."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Government

Comms Service Provider

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?

We work with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response EDR products. We use the EDR products from WithSecure as antivirus and EDR.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?

The system is simple to use with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response. The automated reporting feature allows email notifications when issues arise, though I haven't implemented this...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 35% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 13% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Microsoft Defender XDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 14% of the time

Trend Vision One vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 13% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

January 2026

Download Lumu product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

No data available

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, F-Secure Rapid Detection and Response, F-Secure RDR

Overview

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Detection and Response gives you instant visibility into your IT environment and security status from a single pane of glass. It keeps your business and data safe by detecting attacks fast and responding with expert guidance. And you can elevate the hardest cases to our elite cyber security specialists, so we always have your back.

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Blackfin

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

December 2025

Free Report: Lumu vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about Lumu vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lumu vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.