We performed a comparison between LogRhythm SIEM and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."Compliance reporting is another great feature of this product. It has built in reports right out of the box."
"The correlation engine is extremely valuable because it uses machine learning to process information from the central manager and identifies issues in the network."
"It's positively affected our overall rate of efficiency."
"AXON has the ability to add and compare use cases."
"Its ability to work with all different sorts of log sources has been extremely valuable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are network monitoring, user behavior analytics, and log collection."
"I like LogRhythm's ease of use. The solution has improved compared to previous versions. It had many issues before, like integration, the console, creating reports, false positives, etc. The AI engine has made it stronger in the latest version."
"NextGen SIEM's best feature is how it presents logs."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"We've had issues with scaling and local support."
"Granted, we haven't enabled the UEBA module, but we're forwarding all our proxy logs to LogRhythm and we have a really hard time pulling those proxy logs back out of LogRhythm. However, when we take LogRhythm and forward the same logs into somebody else's user-based analytics software, we get the majority of what we were missing... If we've got all our proxy logs and I go out to Google or Facebook or the like, we should be able to go in and pull that information out ten minutes later, but it's a big challenge to do that."
"The product's stability needs improvement."
"When we had version 7.2.6, there were a lot of issues deploying that version and with the indexing. The indexer was unstable. So, we were not able to use the platform when we were on that version until we were able to upgrade to 7.3.4."
"Move it to Linux. I would like to see it get off the SQL Server."
"It should be improved for automated setup and auto-configuration. There should be ease of integration and ease of setup."
"I would like to see APIs well-documented and public facing, so we can get to them all."
"The user interface needs improvement. The more the user can slide around and know what's going on, the better it will be."
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
Earn 20 points
LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 7th in Log Management with 166 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management. LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.