We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
  • Home
  • LogRhythm NextGen SIEM vs. Quest InTrust

LogRhythm NextGen SIEM vs Quest InTrust comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Devo
Read 13 Devo reviews.
12,001 views|4,605 comparisons
LogRhythm NextGen SIEM Logo
LogRhythm NextGen SIEM
Read 11 LogRhythm NextGen SIEM reviews.
21,059 views|13,493 comparisons
Quest InTrust Logo
Quest InTrust
596 views|453 comparisons
Featured Review
Dennis Pope
A highly scalable, configurable, and intuitive platform that encourages creativity while delivering on Incident...
We've integrated Devo with a SOAR solution. We have prioritized the severity of our alerting in Devo and that corresponds directly to automated... Read more →
Anonymous User
It puts things together and provides the evidence and has good automation and integration capabilities
It is a simpler system than what we had before. We had IBM QRadar, which used to give us everything, and we had to dig through, figure out, and... Read more →
Use Quest InTrust? Share your opinion.
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: January 2022.
Download now
564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."
  • "I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."
  • "Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."
  • "[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."
  • "Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."
  • "Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."
  • "Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."
  • "I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

    • More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In the context of our country, the price of this solution is too high."
  • "We did a five-year agreement. We pay close to a quarter of a million dollars for our solution."
  • "It costs a great amount, but its pricing is competitive with some of the other vendors. For licensing and support, we pay about 20,000. There are no additional costs or anything like that."
  • "The setup and licensing for small and medium size businesses is straightforward, though when it comes to the enterprise it pays to keep in mind the possibility for complications given all the extras and add-ons that may be required."
  • "We work with French-speaking African countries, and it costs more than the average SIEM solution. Also, the pricing isn't too flexible. AlienVault, Splunk, and IBM QRadar are more suitable for customers on a tight budget."

    • More LogRhythm NextGen SIEM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Devo?
    Top Answer: 
    It's very, very versatile.
    Read all 8 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
    Top Answer: 
    Devo, like other vendors, doesn't charge extra for playbooks and automation. That way, you are only paying for the side… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Devo?
    Top Answer: 
    I need more empowerment in reporting. For example, when I'm using Qlik or Power BI in terms of reporting for the… more »
    Read all 8 answers   →
    What is the difference between log management and SIEM?
    Top Answer: 
    Rony, Daniel's answer is right on the money.  There are many solutions for each in the market, a lot depends upon your… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What do you like most about LogRhythm NextGen SIEM?
    Top Answer: 
    I would say the most valuable feature of LogRhythm is that it has built-in UEBA functionality, among other basic Windows… more »
    Read all 30 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NextGen SIEM?
    Top Answer: 
    The setup and licensing for small and medium size businesses is straightforward, though when it comes to the enterprise… more »
    Read all 14 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LogRhythm, LogRhythm Threat Lifecycle Management, LogRhythm TLM
    Learn More
    Devo
    LogRhythm
    Quest Software
    Overview

    Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

    LogRhythm is a world leader in NextGen SIEM, empowering thousands of enterprises on six continents to successfully reduce cyber and operational risk by rapidly detecting, responding to and neutralizing damaging cyberthreats. The LogRhythm NextGen SIEM Platform combines advanced security analytics; user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA); network detection and response (NDR); and security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) in a single end- to-end solution.

    LogRhythm’s technology serves as the foundation for the world’s most modern enterprise security operations centers (SOCs), helping customers measurably secure their cloud, physical, and virtual infrastructures for both IT and OT environments. Built for security professionals by security professionals, the LogRhythm NextGen SIEM Platform has won countless customer and industry accolades. For more information, visit logrhythm.com.

    InTrust is an event log management solution that addresses all of these concerns in heterogeneous environments composed of Windows, Unix and Linux servers, databases, business applications and network devices.

    InTrust enables you to securely collect, store, search and analyze massive amounts of IT data from numerous data sources, systems and devices in one place. Get real-time insights into user activity for security, compliance and operational visibility.

    Offer
    See Devo in Action
    Watch a Demo

    See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

    Learn more about LogRhythm NextGen SIEM
    Learn More
    Learn more about Quest InTrust
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
    Macy's, NASA, Fujitsu, US Air Force, EY, Abbott, HD Supply, SAB Miller, UCLA, Raytheon, Amtrak, Cargill
    Platinum Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company57%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Retailer14%
    Insurance Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Government7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Healthcare Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise36%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise64%
    Large Enterprise15%
    No Data Available
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: January 2022.
    Download now
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    LogRhythm NextGen SIEM is ranked 9th in Log Management with 11 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 37th in Log Management. LogRhythm NextGen SIEM is rated 8.4, while Quest InTrust is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm NextGen SIEM writes "It puts things together and provides the evidence and has good automation and integration capabilities". On the other hand, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM is most compared with Splunk, Datadog, IBM QRadar, ELK Logstash and Graylog, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Splunk, syslog-ng, Dell InTrust and Change Auditor for Windows File Servers.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.