LogRhythm NetMon vs NetCrunch comparison

LogRhythm and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7, while AdRem Software is ranked #83. LogRhythm holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm NetMon

Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews

570 Views
262 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

384 Views
218 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NetCrunch and LogRhythm NetMon are competing network management solutions. LogRhythm NetMon emerges as a superior choice due to its robust features and analysis capabilities, although users favor NetCrunch for its cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: NetCrunch offers comprehensive network monitoring, real-time alerting, and an intuitive dashboard, making it ideal for IT infrastructure management. LogRhythm NetMon provides advanced threat detection and detailed network traffic analysis, which is preferable for cybersecurity-focused environments.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch could benefit from enhancements in its threat detection capabilities, deeper traffic analysis, and improved reporting features. LogRhythm NetMon may need to streamline its user interface for more intuitive use, provide easier integration with existing systems, and reduce its deployment complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch's flexible deployment options and responsive support make it accessible for diverse IT environments. LogRhythm NetMon offers a more complex deployment, but its guidance and proactive support are notable strengths.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch is valued for its competitive pricing structure that maximizes ROI with a lower initial setup cost. LogRhythm NetMon, with a higher setup cost, delivers significant ROI through advanced features, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive network security.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. NetCrunch

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,957 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

56th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetCrunch

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

83rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (28th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (66th), Log Management (73rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

KeithGalleros

Information Security Analyst at Detecon Al Saudia Company Limited

A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.

Read full review

Reginald Pierre

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

11%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

15%

Agriculture

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 36% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 25% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 19% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 68% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 33% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon

June 2025

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

May 2025

Download NetCrunch product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor

No data available

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

NetCrunch is the complete network monitoring solution for monitoring traffic, topology, devices, systems, logs, and services. It's policy, and template-based configuration makes managing thousands of nodes a breeze. It automatically generates layer-2 maps and manages monitoring dependencies. NetCrunch supports major operating systems, virtualization platforms, and the Cloud. Complete SNMP support with 8,700+ MIBs included and a built-in MIB compiler.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. NetCrunch

June 2025

Free Report: LogRhythm NetMon vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.