Logpoint vs Lookout comparison

Logpoint and Lookout are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Logpoint is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.3, while Lookout is ranked #52 with an average rating of 7.0. Logpoint holds a 1.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Lookout’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Logpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Lookout users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Lookout and Logpoint offer unique cybersecurity solutions. Lookout seems to have the upper hand regarding ease of deployment, while Logpoint excels in feature robustness and perceived value based on user feedback.

Features: Lookout users highlight its comprehensive mobile threat defense, ease of integration, and competitive pricing. Logpoint users praise its powerful analytics, SIEM capabilities, and advanced reporting tools. Logpoint's advanced analytics give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Lookout users desire more extensive reporting options, better visualization tools, and enhanced real-time alerting. Logpoint users seek a more intuitive setup process, improved user interface, and better documentation. Lookout's reporting limitations are a more significant drawback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Lookout is known for its quick deployment and responsive support. Logpoint’s deployment can be complex, but its excellent customer service mitigates this. Lookout wins in deployment simplicity, while Logpoint's service levels the field.

Pricing and ROI: Lookout has competitive setup costs and good ROI. Logpoint is more expensive but considered worth the investment due to its extensive features, leading to a higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Logpoint vs. Lookout Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. Lookout

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lookout is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Logpoint	1.0%
Lookout	0.8%
Other	94.5%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Rifat Hasan

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.

Read full review

David Baynton

IT Manager at NHS Trust

Enhanced mobile security with visibility into app and website usage, but installation challenges remain

We use Lookout for mobile devices, such as phones It has reduced our risk around mobile devices. I like the security features and being able to see what apps and websites people are using. There is nothing we have come across that we've desired. We have been using Lookout for one year. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable. We chose Traps because it is the only product that we were not able to get anything past."

"The initial setup isn't too bad."

"Cortex is the best tool for endpoint detection, and I have used it to verify hashes or domains to identify malicious activity, trigger playbooks that automate and gather endpoint logs, block malicious processes, and update incident tickets, showcasing end-to-end processes with automation in investigation and reducing the analysis workflow."

"Since they've done their most recent update, the ease to isolate endpoints is valuable. If we find one where there is a virus on it, we can easily isolate it. We don't even have to contact the user. We don't have to manually take them off the network. We can easily isolate them."

"The live terminal is probably the best thing ever. It gives you the access to get straight onto any machine."

"Its interface and pricing are most valuable, and it is better than other vendors in terms of security."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the user interface."

"From the Palo Alto side, whatever they buy, they integrate that really well into their integration suite, and that makes a massive difference."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable feature of LogPoint is that they have the SIEM and SOAR combined in one solution. They are not on a separate platform."

"Even if I bash a lot on LogPoint, I must say that it's a bang for the buck product."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."

"Technical support is responsive and very friendly."

"The most valuable features are the ones that we use the most, which are the search and report facilities."

"The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration."

"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."

"It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all the activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline."

More Logpoint pros

"We have not had any issues with bugs or breakdowns."

"The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."

"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."

Cons

"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."

"For Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, if I had to point out improvements, I would say the UI is still somewhat difficult for beginners."

"The negative aspect I see is the economic model used by Palo Alto."

"On the pricing aspect, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks needs to have a more reasonable rate, particularly for customers in Sri Lanka and Asian countries."

"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."

"A little bit more automation would be nice."

"There is a severe gap in functionality between Windows, Linux, and Mac versions. For example all folder restriction settings are Windows only. Traps 5.0+ does not have SAML / LDAP integration."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Customer Service: This is a HUGE problem."

"LogPoint must find a way to integrate the servers without agents."

"LogPoint can improve its dashboards. We are not able to customize the dashboard when creating them. They only have preset dashboards which do not have exactly what we are looking for."

"Our customers were not happy with firewalling and the endpoint antivirus."

"One of the downsides is it is not a SaaS solution. It must be on-premises."

"LogPoint is complex and we don't have the skills to maintain use cases or even to extend the use cases."

"Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation."

"Dashboards could be developed further."

More Logpoint cons

"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."

"The initial setup requires a little bit of experience with configuration."

"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"The tool's price is moderate."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It's getting more expensive, which is one of the reasons we're looking around just to see if there's anything better value."

"It has a fixed price, which is what I like about LogPoint. I bought the system and paid for it, and I pay maintenance. It is not a consumption model. Most SIEMs or most of the log management systems are consumption-based, which means that you pay for how many logs you have in the system. That's a real problem because logs can grow very quickly in different circumstances, and when you have a variable price model, you never know what you're going to pay. Splunk is notoriously expensive for that reason. If you use Splunk or QRadar, it becomes expensive because there are not just the logs; you also have to parse the logs and create indexes. Those indexes can be very expensive in terms of space. Therefore, if they charge you by this space, you can end up paying a significant amount of money. It can be more than what you expect to pay. I like the fact that LogPoint has a fixed cost. I know what I'm going to pay on a yearly basis. I pay that, and I pay the maintenance, and I just make it work."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair; it's comparable to our previous solution, and we carried out multiple POCs and POVs (proof of value). The product is worth the money we pay for it."

"Lookout is definitely on the lower end when it comes to price point and that seems to be the only differentiator. The technology is in place in this space and it's really about who is coming in at the better price point now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogPoint?

I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lookout?

The pricing is a little expensive. We are currently looking at comparisons with other solutions, including Umbrella.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lookout?

There is nothing we have come across that we've desired.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lookout?

We use Lookout for mobile devices, such as phones.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 6% of the time

Graylog Security vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Zimperium vs Lookout

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Lookout

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Lookout

Compared 5% of the time

VirusTotal vs Lookout

Compared 4% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Lookout

Compared 3% of the time

More Lookout Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint

August 2026

Download Logpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Threat Defense

August 2026

Download Lookout product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

CipherCloud

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.

Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.

What are the most important features of Logpoint?

Easy-to-use dashboard: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Correlation engine: Connects data for in-depth security insights.
Comprehensive log collection: Facilitates extensive data gathering.
Third-party integrations: Connects seamlessly with other tools.
UEBA and SOAR components: Enhance threat response and automation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides significant value for its pricing.
User-friendly interface: Enhances usability with straightforward design.
Compliance navigation: Eases PCI DSS and GDPR compliance.
Quick support service: Provides responsive customer assistance.

Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.

Logpoint

Lookout offers a mobile EDR solution that uniquely addresses the challenges of iOS and Android security, providing comprehensive threat defense and visibility.

By utilizing AI-driven security and behavioral analysis, Lookout identifies and mitigates mobile threats before they escalate. Lookout's mobile threat defense system is tailored for modern risks, protecting employee devices from social engineering attacks such as phishing and smishing. It bridges the gap between mobile and traditional endpoint security, ensuring secure mobile productivity through the world's largest mobile security data set.

What are the key features of Lookout?

AI-Driven Threat Detection: Uses AI to identify and neutralize threats proactively.
Comprehensive Mobile Security: Protects against mobile malware, and network threats.
Behavioral Analysis: Evaluates device activities to detect anomalies and potential threats.
Advanced Social Engineering Defense: Guards against phishing, smishing, and other social engineering tactics.
Risk Alignment: Integrates mobile risk assessment with traditional endpoint security.

What benefits should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Ensures robust protection against emerging mobile threats.
Improved Visibility: Provides real-time insights for effective risk management.
Increased Productivity: Enables secure access to mobile apps and data.
AI-Powered Protection: Delivers smarter and faster threat detection.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for multiple security solutions.

Lookout is widely implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and government due to its ability to secure sensitive data on mobile platforms. Financial institutions value its proactive threat detection, healthcare providers rely on its compliance capabilities, and government agencies trust its robust defense against sophisticated attacks. Lookout helps organizations maintain security while enabling mobile productivity.

Lookout

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. Lookout

August 2026

Free Report: Logpoint vs. Lookout

Find out what your peers are saying about Logpoint vs. Lookout and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logpoint vs. Lookout report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.