LiveAction LiveNX vs Statseeker comparison

BlueCat and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. BlueCat is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. BlueCat holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,322 Views
955 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

416 Views
252 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

LiveAction LiveNX and Statseeker compete in the network performance monitoring space. LiveNX is favored for its advanced visualization capabilities, while Statseeker stands out for lower cost and efficient bandwidth usage, offering a strong value proposition.

Features: LiveNX provides dynamic network visualization, real-time traffic analysis, and supports complex environments for improved troubleshooting. Statseeker offers rapid data retrieval, lightweight performance, and historical reporting with minimal bandwidth usage.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could enhance ease of setup, reduce resource consumption, and improve integration options. Statseeker may benefit from enriched visualization features, broader analytics capabilities, and expanded compatibility with various network types.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX requires more extensive setup due to its advanced features, often needing additional support. Statseeker allows for quick installation and has a straightforward interface that aids easy navigation, resulting in reduced demand for customer support.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX often comes with higher initial costs, justified by its extensive feature set, perceived as worth the investment. Statseeker typically offers lower setup costs, providing a budget-friendly option with a quick ROI due to efficient resource utilization.

To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (48th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Doshi

IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support

Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.

Read full review

Jessie Hackney

Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education

Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise

The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."

"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."

"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."

"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"We use the free version."

"It's very expensive."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 23% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 18% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 8% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 54% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 46% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

April 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

LiveNX

No data available

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Free Report: LiveAction LiveNX vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction LiveNX vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LiveAction LiveNX vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.