Layer7 API Management vs Red Hat Integration comparison

Broadcom and Red Hat are both solutions in the API Management category. Broadcom is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #43. Broadcom holds a 2.0% mindshare in APIM, compared to Red Hat’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Layer7 API Management

Read 112 Layer7 API Management reviews

5,332 Views
5,279 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Red Hat Integration

Read 2 Red Hat Integration reviews

498 Views
498 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Layer7 API Management

Red Hat Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Layer7 API Management and Red Hat Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Layer7 API Management vs. Red Hat Integration Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management vs. Red Hat Integration

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management

Ranking in API Management

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Integration

Ranking in API Management

43rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Integration is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Layer7 API Management	2.0%
Red Hat Integration	0.5%
Other	97.5%

API Management

Featured Reviews

C Vvanigalla

Works

Integration capabilities excel and support for varied platforms enhances communication across backend systems

We mainly use REST APIs, and the solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It allows communication with a number of back-end providers and data consolidation. The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable. Code changes and migration are straightforward, and it supports identity and access management integration.

Read full review

CHEW YONG

Principle Solution Architect at beans

Facilitates seamless integration while offering room for OpenShift flexibility

I am still a reseller for IBM products today. I focus on integration solutions. For integration, my clients are using CP4I. For CP4I, I'm using ACE-S, API Connect, and MQ. These are the three products I'm selling from IBM. My clients are using IBM App Connect on-premises. I basically sell open source, specifically Red Hat Integration for integration purposes. Red Hat Integration is part of the Red Hat Integration bundle, which includes two different software solutions bundled together with Red Hat. It's bundled with the OpenShift plus the foundation. I am a Principal Solution Architect. I would be available for them to reach out by email for any questions or comments regarding my review. I want to be a reference for them. I rate Red Hat Integration an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm part of an engineering team so this product coming with out-of-the-box security, that is valuable to our organization."

"This product, at first blush, looks something like it's one of those weekend warrior tools, but it's not. It's an enterprise-class tool with the kind of usability that you wouldn't expect. And with that usability - how do you have your cake and eat it too? Well, it's because of the product's extensibility. It's very well-integrated with your existing Java library of processes and procedures, as well as your ability to write new extensions to it. You get so much of the base functionality but you don't give up the ability customize."

"CA API suite is a strong solution with very good security capabilities and end-to-end lifecycle management of APIs."

"Layer7 is the most important step in our Application Modernization strategy."

"From a security standpoint, it works great. It is the right solution for us. It's lightweight, a software-appliance configuration which was easy to deploy and configure."

"The API Gateway has allowed us to manage and maintain systems quickly, with great versatility, while solving problems in real-time."

"This is definitely a stable solution."

"Thanks to this product, we have successfully secured SOAP and REST APIs and exposed them to international/domestic partners using the standard industry protocols."

More Layer7 API Management pros

"Real-time event streaming is good because you can do real-time data insight, monitor any event that happens, take the action, and provide a real-time dashboard based on certain data."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat Integration lie in its ease of customization for business needs and the flexibility to design workflows according to specific requirements."

Cons

"In terms of using the tool itself, it is not user-friendly."

"One of the features that the tool provides is the ability to simply onboard new APIs to an existing security platform. We build all the policies for security upfront, and then we can add those policies pretty simply and straightforwardly to any new API that gets developed in the enterprise."

"I think it was lacking some documentation around performance tuning and getting the product operationalized so that it could maintain itself."

"The portal is not the most intuitive and the way things are displayed makes it difficult to find the information we need."

"The overall cost of Layer7 API Management is high, they can improve it by making it less expensive."

"There is a need for the migration of policies, better reporting, and monitoring integration."

"CA double up portal is a pain. It is something that we are struggling with right now."

"I would like to see it work better with one of our back-end databases, DB2 UDB."

More Layer7 API Management cons

"The performance of a few computations for the message broker version could be more stable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Layer7 API Management is reasonable compared to Apigee."

"If you do a TCO of more than five years, then you will see a big jump in costs for some vendors."

"If the CA pricing for API management would be a little lower, they would be able to cover a broader market."

"There are some costs for maintenance that we are charged, but that seems fair because we get the support."

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time."

"I feel that it is costly for medium-sized companies."

"The price of Layer7 API Management is too high and should be reduced. However, it is a good solution in the market."

More Layer7 API Management pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive platform and not suitable for small companies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Marketing Services Firm

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	84

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?

Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?

Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Layer7 API Management?

I am not the client. I implement Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ) for the clients. I have worked on multiple projects as a developer, implementing for Hydro Tasmani...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Integration?

The disadvantage of Red Hat Integration is that it has to be tightly coupled to the OpenShift platform, so I couldn't run it on any platform other than OpenShift.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Integration?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Integration?

The use cases for Red Hat Integration are integration and transformation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 9% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Layer7 API Management Competitors

3scale API Management vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 39% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 38% of the time

Perforce Acana vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management

May 2026

Download Layer7 API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

May 2026

Download Red Hat Integration product report

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway

No data available

Overview

Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.

It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.

With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

Broadcom

Red Hat Integration is a comprehensive platform that facilitates agile integration, connecting applications, data, and devices. Designed for developers and enterprises, it offers modern integration features to streamline operations and enhance connectivity.

Red Hat Integration provides an efficient solution for creating and managing integrations with its robust tools and services. It supports modern IT environments, promoting collaboration and reducing complexity with its open-source technology. Key features like messaging, transformation, and service orchestration empower businesses to implement flexible integration strategies seamlessly.

What are the key features of Red Hat Integration?

Messaging: Connects applications through various messaging patterns for scalable data exchange.
Data Transformation: Enables efficient data processing across diverse systems.
API Management: Offers comprehensive API control and security measures.
Service Orchestration: Integrates multiple services to create cohesive processes.
Event-Driven Architecture: Supports responsive application design through real-time events.

What benefits and ROI should you consider?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines integration processes, saving time and resources.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business demands with ease.
Flexibility: Provides multiple integration methods to suit different needs.
Cost Savings: Reduces operational costs by leveraging open-source solutions.

Red Hat Integration finds its application in industries like finance and healthcare, where it plays a vital role in secure data processing and compliance management. Its flexibility and scalable architecture make it a preferred choice for enterprises aiming to enhance their digital capabilities through efficient system integration.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Oracle 4. Salesforce 5. SAP 6. Cisco 7. Dell 8. HP 9. Adobe 10. VMware 11. Accenture 12. Capgemini 13. Deloitte 14. PwC 15. Ernst & Young 16. Infosys 17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 18. Wipro 19. Cognizant 20. HCL Technologies 21. Tech Mahindra 22. Fujitsu 23. Hitachi 24. NEC 25. NTT Data 26. Ericsson 27. Nokia 28. Siemens 29. AT&T 30. Verizon 31. Vodafone 32. Orange

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management vs. Red Hat Integration

April 2026

Free Report: Layer7 API Management vs. Red Hat Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Layer7 API Management vs. Red Hat Integration and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Layer7 API Management vs. Red Hat Integration report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.