LaunchDarkly vs Tekton comparison

LaunchDarkly and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. LaunchDarkly is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. LaunchDarkly holds a 0.4% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LaunchDarkly users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.

LaunchDarkly

Read 7 LaunchDarkly reviews

141 Views
37 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

4,811 Views
3,186 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

LaunchDarkly

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Tekton and LaunchDarkly compete in the DevOps and release management category, with Tekton having an edge in pricing and support due to its open-source nature, while LaunchDarkly is often seen as the more advanced option because of its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Tekton's top features include seamless integration with Kubernetes, customizable workflows, and robust plugins to enhance automation. LaunchDarkly offers powerful granular feature flag management, real-time experimentation, and rollout tools, which improve the feature release process.

Room for Improvement: Tekton can better address its support access and improve log clarity and troubleshooting resources. It could also expand documentation on complex deployment scenarios. LaunchDarkly might focus on enhancing cost-efficiency for smaller businesses and develop more intuitive integration for new users. Providing deeper analytics options could also benefit its users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton benefits from its Kubernetes-native design, which simplifies deployment for Kubernetes users. In contrast, LaunchDarkly is praised for its varied deployment options and proactive customer service that facilitates smoother integration, making it an appealing choice for organizations needing comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton is cost-effective due to being open source, lowering initial setup expenses. LaunchDarkly, with its higher upfront cost, delivers substantial ROI through improved feature releases and real-time feedback, justifying its pricing for organizations focused on advanced feature management. Their pricing strategies differ significantly, catering to varied business financial strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed LaunchDarkly vs. Tekton Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LaunchDarkly vs. Tekton

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LaunchDarkly

Ranking in Build Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of LaunchDarkly is 0.4%. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.0%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

James Bayhylle

Principal Technical Program Manager at ChowNow

Provides risk-free releases with control access and A/B testing

It allowed us to deploy faster. Despite having a rigorous code review process that slowed things down, once the code was reviewed, LaunchDarkly enabled safe deployments. If there was ever an issue, we could easily roll back a particular release by simply turning off the feature flag. When configuring and setting this up, begin with feature sets that are relatively small in scope. This helps build the necessary skills to leverage the product effectively while maintaining control over the blast radius, thus reducing risk to your customers and application in case of misconfiguration. As you gain more experience with the solution, it's crucial to have a process to manage feature flag sprawl, as mentioned earlier. Implementing a life cycle management system for your feature flags is essential. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten because of its intuitiveness and ease of use.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I appreciate that we can release any feature in production and maintain control over it."

"I like that it offers the ability to control the flags."

"From the development side, it allows us to manage multiple things."

"The setup is easy."

"It has really helped during the series of product lines and faster deployment and faster development."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The ability to turn off a flag is crucial when a task is not complete, especially if there is an error in a commit."

"I like the branching and visualization tools for the pipeline."

"One of the best things I appreciate is that Tekton runs on the Kubernetes platform. This is very useful when working on a project with other team members. For instance, suppose we have a very big project that requires building a large amount of source code or running many unit tests. During the build and unit test phases, Tekton on Kubernetes allows us to have a scalable machine to handle these tasks. This scalability is the most useful aspect for me."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its cloud-native and Kubernetes-ready design."

"Tekton is a stable product."

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

"I would say the customization ability that Tekton provides is good."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its wireless capability, which makes installation easy and sets up the flow."

"The ability to scale is valuable."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"Right now, no improvements are needed."

"I have used LaunchDarkly for around two and a half years and I haven't faced any issues with it."

"The feature where one feature flag is dependent on another could be explored more for our usage."

"Fetching information about multiple flags in a single action would be beneficial."

"When the system has an excessive number of feature flags, managing them can become cumbersome."

"We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns."

"I strongly believe they need to develop a strategy for handling situations where LaunchDarkly goes down."

"It would be better if Tekton could show the YAML file while it is running, similar to GitHub pipelines, to provide more visibility on what's happening."

"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."

"The product's UI could be improved, as there are occasional latency issues. The triggering part, especially the CRD installation needs enhancement."

"While Tekton is highly effective for Kubernetes-based setups, it might not suit users who require more control over bare-metal environments."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Improvements could include introducing a UI-based pipeline development feature, such as drag and drop, which would help individuals with limited technical knowledge start building pipelines."

"I'm a bit worried about scaling Tekton from the point of view of big CI/CD processes."

"The stability issues can be there."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is free of cost."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The solution is open-source."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LaunchDarkly?

I consider the pricing to be high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LaunchDarkly?

We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns. I would rate LaunchDarkly a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LaunchDarkly?

We use LaunchDarkly for managing feature flags. It helps manage the keys to control what users view on our screens.

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs LaunchDarkly

Compared 100% of the time

More LaunchDarkly Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 33% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 24% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

April 2025

Download LaunchDarkly product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

April 2025

Download Tekton product report

Overview

LaunchDarkly is acclaimed for its feature flag management, enabling safer, high-velocity code deployment and precise control over rollouts. Organizations use it to test, deploy, and manage features across user segments, performing canary releases and quick rollbacks without new code deployment. Users praise its robust flag system, real-time updates, detailed targeting, comprehensive analytics, and strong integration capabilities, significantly enhancing development efficiency and productivity.

LaunchDarkly

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

LaunchDarkly vs. Tekton

April 2025

Free Report: LaunchDarkly vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about LaunchDarkly vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LaunchDarkly vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.