LambdaTest vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

LambdaTest and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7, while Progress Software is ranked #24. LambdaTest holds a 5.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,174 Views
2,187 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

925 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Telerik Test Studio and LambdaTest are competing in the software testing domain. Telerik Test Studio has a broader application coverage, while LambdaTest shines in cross-browser testing capabilities.

Features: Telerik Test Studio offers user-friendly automation scripts, supports web, desktop, and APIs, and provides an integrated environment with rich reporting. LambdaTest provides extensive cross-browser compatibility testing, operates on a cloud infrastructure with real browsers and OS, and offers versatile online testing labs for responsive testing.

Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could improve by enhancing its cross-browser testing capabilities, expanding its cloud-based testing options, and providing more cost-effective pricing plans. LambdaTest might focus on increasing application testing coverage, improving local testing features, and offering advanced reporting tools for deeper insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio is known for its intuitive setup, integration with existing workflows, and reliable support options. LambdaTest utilizes a cloud-based deployment for immediate access without complex setups and provides 24/7 support, catering to agile teams with scalable infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio has higher upfront costs but promises higher long-term ROI with reduced manual testing efforts. LambdaTest offers a cost-effective solution appealing to organizations focusing on cross-browser testing, with quick ROI through enhanced testing coverage and reduced browser testing time.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (17th), Regression Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.7%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."

"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."

"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

More LambdaTest pros

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

Cons

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."

"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."

"Their smart testing module needs improvement."

More LambdaTest cons

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an affordable product."

"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"I used the product for free."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 66% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 15% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 36% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

June 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Telerik Test Studio

May 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.