We performed a comparison between Kubecost and Sophos Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two AWS Marketplace solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The price is reasonable, considering the value it delivers."
"It offers a detailed examination of your cluster, including the types of instances utilized, allocated CPU and RAM, and resource distribution for specific applications."
"I mostly like the dashboards."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy and user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of Sophos Central are total threat hunting and detection response."
"Sophos Central provides reports on downloads. It alerts the admin when users use their personal computers. The product is also flexible."
"It is easy to save time using the Sophos Central centralized dashboard. It's definitely easier because you're in one place with all the products."
"One of the most valuable features of Sophos Central is its Synchronized Security."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"One significant advantage is its competitive dashboard compared to Trend Micro."
"The tool improves security and saves time."
"The integration with other solutions could be improved."
"Faster monitoring could potentially improve overall stability in the production environment."
"There is a significant potential for enhancing it through the incorporation of advanced technologies like AI and generative AI."
"The initial setup was moderately straightforward, around six or seven out of ten on the complexity scale. While it wasn't overly complicated, the multifactor authentication posed a challenge initially."
"Having and option for endpoint security on mobile devices, it would be advantageous."
"There were challenges we faced with generating reports for the physical firewall in certain instances."
"The program slows down when you try to control or visualize multiple systems."
"The tool is slow in the Middle East region. It should also integrate custom reporting."
"One area I would like to see improvement in Sophos Central is the multi-factor authentication process."
"Pushing global rules and policies to all devices from Central isn't easy. You can do it for all endpoints, which is fine. But you can't do the same with firewalls. Firewall management with Central is very limited. You can connect one firewall to another and tell it, "I want one policy for all my customer's firewalls," but that's not possible. For a customer with multiple firewalls, you can't say, "This works for France, Great Britain, Canada," and push it. It's not possible."
"Vulnerability protection and monitoring any changes are crucial aspects that require attention."
Kubecost is ranked 15th in AWS Marketplace with 3 reviews while Sophos Central is ranked 2nd in AWS Marketplace with 33 reviews. Kubecost is rated 9.4, while Sophos Central is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Kubecost writes "Identifies and eliminates overprovisioning of expensive resources like storage, highly scalable and offers performance ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Central writes "Scalable product, integration of artificial intelligence improves security posture but not easy to push global policies and support needs improvement". Kubecost is most compared with , whereas Sophos Central is most compared with . See our Kubecost vs. Sophos Central report.
See our list of best AWS Marketplace vendors.
We monitor all AWS Marketplace reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
