Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Red Hat Integration comparison

Kong and Red Hat are both solutions in the API Management category. Kong is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Red Hat is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Kong holds a 7.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to Red Hat’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Kong users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Read 25 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews

7,148 Views
7,148 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Red Hat Integration

Read 2 Red Hat Integration reviews

105 Views
105 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Red Hat Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kong Gateway Enterprise and Red Hat Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in API Management.

To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Integration

Ranking in API Management

33rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 7.1%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Integration is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Sudhanshu Dev

Senior Principal DevOps Engineer at barq

Custom plugin capability with enhanced high traffic handling and lightweight performance

We use Kong for our API gateway, handling all public traffic. It is an open-source tool, and even though we are a startup, it provides us with stability without incurring high costs initially Kong has helped us by performing smoothly even when we receive millions of requests, which prevents any…

Read full review

CHEW YONG

Principle Solution Architect at beans

Facilitates seamless integration while offering room for OpenShift flexibility

I am still a reseller for IBM products today. I focus on integration solutions. For integration, my clients are using CP4I. For CP4I, I'm using ACE-S, API Connect, and MQ. These are the three products I'm selling from IBM. My clients are using IBM App Connect on-premises. I basically sell open source, specifically Red Hat Integration for integration purposes. Red Hat Integration is part of the Red Hat Integration bundle, which includes two different software solutions bundled together with Red Hat. It's bundled with the OpenShift plus the foundation. I am a Principal Solution Architect. I would be available for them to reach out by email for any questions or comments regarding my review. I want to be a reference for them. I rate Red Hat Integration an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kong enterprise has significantly enhanced our ability to manage and secure our Microservices. Its most valuable feature is monitoring."

"Kong's most valuable features are its lightweight performance when handling millions of requests and the ability to write custom plugins to enhance security, such as end-to-end encryption, even in the open-source version."

"This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution."

"The solution provides good performance."

"Kong Enterprise comes with some ready plug-ins, which is very good for the customers."

"Based on my experience, I would definitely recommend Kong Gateway Enterprise to other people."

"The features I like include ease of operation and implementation in a cloud environment, the dashboarding features for API statistics, and the user-friendly developer portal."

"In terms of stability, the tool's team has made some good efforts, and my company is very happy with the product's approach."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros

"The most valuable features of Red Hat Integration lie in its ease of customization for business needs and the flexibility to design workflows according to specific requirements."

"Real-time event streaming is good because you can do real-time data insight, monitor any event that happens, take the action, and provide a real-time dashboard based on certain data."

Cons

"The ease of billing is lost when Kong is not available directly on the Azure marketplace. This is one area where they can improve."

"Because it is open-source, it should be less expensive than others."

"The tool needs improvement in UX."

"From an improvement perspective, the product should offer more readily available connectors and also allow for more seamless AI integrations."

"Kong Enterprise fails to provide live tracing of the APIs, which is possible nowadays."

"The technical support team's response time needs to be improved."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Kong Enterprise needs to improve its pricing, which starts at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Pricing should be based on API usage rather than monthly. It should improve its documentation as well."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons

"The performance of a few computations for the message broker version could be more stable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."

"The product is reasonably priced because it goes by the SaaS model."

"The price is really reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."

"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."

"There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."

"The licensing fees are paid yearly."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive platform and not suitable for small companies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kong Enterprise?

The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?

More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Integration?

The most valuable features of Red Hat Integration lie in its ease of customization for business needs and the flexibility to design workflows according to specific requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Integration?

It is an expensive platform and not suitable for small companies. It costs around $30,000 for standard support services and lacks flexibility.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Integration?

The performance of a few computations for the message broker version could be more stable. It requires highly secure functionality with optimal network coverage. We encounter failure issues during ...

See all answers

Comparisons

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise

August 2025

Download Kong Gateway Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download Red Hat Integration product report

Overview

Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

Kong

Red Hat Integration is a comprehensive platform that facilitates agile integration, connecting applications, data, and devices. Designed for developers and enterprises, it offers modern integration features to streamline operations and enhance connectivity.

Red Hat Integration provides an efficient solution for creating and managing integrations with its robust tools and services. It supports modern IT environments, promoting collaboration and reducing complexity with its open-source technology. Key features like messaging, transformation, and service orchestration empower businesses to implement flexible integration strategies seamlessly.

What are the key features of Red Hat Integration?

Messaging: Connects applications through various messaging patterns for scalable data exchange.
Data Transformation: Enables efficient data processing across diverse systems.
API Management: Offers comprehensive API control and security measures.
Service Orchestration: Integrates multiple services to create cohesive processes.
Event-Driven Architecture: Supports responsive application design through real-time events.

What benefits and ROI should you consider?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines integration processes, saving time and resources.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business demands with ease.
Flexibility: Provides multiple integration methods to suit different needs.
Cost Savings: Reduces operational costs by leveraging open-source solutions.

Red Hat Integration finds its application in industries like finance and healthcare, where it plays a vital role in secure data processing and compliance management. Its flexibility and scalable architecture make it a preferred choice for enterprises aiming to enhance their digital capabilities through efficient system integration.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in API Management. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.