Kiteworks vs Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 comparison

Kiteworks and Cognosys Inc Hardened Images are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Kiteworks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Cognosys Inc Hardened Images is ranked #55. Kiteworks holds a 1.3% mindshare in ECM, compared to Cognosys Inc Hardened Images’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cognosys Inc Hardened Images users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

3,471 Views
521 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...

Read 10 Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 reviews

134 Views
82 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kiteworks and Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (25th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (13th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

55th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kiteworks	1.3%
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7	0.3%
Other	98.4%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Christine Ndanu

Project Manager at PwC

Cloud file management has improved collaboration and strengthened security across our teams

Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by improving collaboration, especially through remote collaboration due to the use of a mobile application. Security posture in my organization has really improved due to the robust security features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. Furthermore, it can be accessed from anywhere, making collaboration easy. Some of the best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers are in-built Office suite, works just from any browser, cloud-based, no additional app download is required, alerts and notifications are on par, version control to view any changes made, and access control over any file or folder. The mobile application and remote collaboration features helped my team improve collaboration and also increased our security posture after we implemented Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 in all our organization departments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"Kiteworks is easy to manage and maintain with a user-friendly interface and I recommend it to anyone that requires a file-sharing system that supports SFTP."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"We can see when people are sending things. We can definitely see who is sending to whom. From the administrative logs, we can see who is sending to an outside entity, and those logs are retained for quite a while."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

More Kiteworks pros

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has improved our productivity, especially through improved collaboration, from 50 to 65%."

"My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that it serves as a great collaboration tool."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by providing savings through automation, giving our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and the best way to automate daily tasks."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization with apparent savings from the top and up front, with cost reduction, productivity increase, and saved time and efforts in terms of the team's collaborations."

"I have seen a return on investment with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, as it has given our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and provided them the best tool to automate daily tasks, hence saving a lot of time and cost."

"Since I started using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, it has increased productivity, with collaboration improving from forty to fifty-five percent."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by reducing the cost of having tangible memory devices since Microsoft Sharepoint provides unlimited cloud storage."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is a great tool that has led to faster turnaround times, less back and forth, improved customer service, more transparency into team functions, elimination of steps through processes, and reengineering, thereby saving cost and time."

More Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 pros

Cons

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"File location could be improved."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"We mainly had stability issues with kiteworks, where we were pushing the limits of its capability."

"We have experienced some issues with stability due to bugs."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"There is one particular thing that is a nuisance."

More Kiteworks cons

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved by making the user interface more intuitive and easy to customize."

"Customization can be difficult when the out-of-box functionality does not work for your needs."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 should work offline and there is no password protection for folders."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved in browser support, which is one of the biggest areas where Sharepoint can improve."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved as it still needs to integrate some services together such as Planner and Lists so that teams can interact from a single place."

"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with better documentation, especially the online documentation for new learners."

"Occasionally, we would somehow have an issue with one or two users not seeing the latest document, which was a minor annoyance, but after a few minutes, we were able to get back on track due to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7."

"One way Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved is by merging two or more Sharepoint sites from different companies together if they are working together."

More Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Control-M vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

March 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

March 2026

Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 report

Download Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 product report

Also Known As

Accellion

No data available

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Information not available

Cognosys Inc Hardened Images

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.