Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Morphisec comparison

Kaspersky and Morphisec are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Kaspersky is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.9, while Morphisec is ranked #60. Kaspersky holds a 1.9% mindshare in EDR, compared to Morphisec’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Morphisec users who would recommend it.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Read 18 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response reviews

1,761 Views
1,761 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Morphisec

Read 21 Morphisec reviews

1,876 Views
1,051 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Morphisec

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Morphisec and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are two prominent endpoint security solutions. Users favor Kaspersky for its comprehensive features, while Morphisec is preferred for its cost-effective pricing and responsive support.

Features: Morphisec is praised for its lightweight and effective prevention capabilities against advanced threats. It features easy deployment, low system impact, and robust prevention techniques. Kaspersky offers extensive features like comprehensive threat intelligence, advanced analytics, and detailed threat detection and response, making it suitable for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Morphisec users note the need for more granular controls, enhanced reporting tools, and better integration capabilities. Kaspersky users suggest improvements in system performance optimization, UI enhancements, and reducing resource consumption. Both products have areas for refinement, but Kaspersky's advanced functionality generates higher expectations for improvement among its users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Morphisec is commended for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Kaspersky, while slightly more complex to deploy, is valued for its well-structured support system and thorough documentation. User reviews indicate Morphisec is easier to deploy, but Kaspersky's customer service is recognized as more comprehensive.

Pricing and ROI: Morphisec is noted for its affordable setup costs and quicker ROI due to its efficiency in deployment and simple pricing structure. Kaspersky, although more expensive, is considered worth the investment for organizations needing advanced features and a higher level of security. Users perceive Kaspersky as delivering a better ROI in the long run despite the initial higher expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Morphisec Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Morphisec

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Morphisec

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

60th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (64th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (53rd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (35th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (33rd), Threat Deception Platforms (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Morphisec is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Majid Ali

Manager Cyber Security Department at Mana

Security tool provides basic protection but faces challenges in support and feature set

I'm facing challenges because the local support is not up to mark, and its features are not comparable to industry-leading solutions such as CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Kaspersky needs to improve its local support to become a better product for future releases. The local support is inadequate, and compared to Trend Micro and CrowdStrike, many features are missing in this tool regarding investigation, threat hunting, and threat intelligence. These features are not up to mark in this tool compared to other EDR solutions, and the interface is very unfriendly.

Read full review

Rick Schibler

VP of Information Technology at Kentucky Trailer

Offers in-memory protection at a lower price than competitors

Morphisec's in-memory protection is probably the most valuable feature because it stops malicious activity from occurring. If something tries to install or act as a sleeper agent, Morphisec will detect and stop it. Morphisec's Moving Target Defense is critical to hardening our attack surface. If it detects something, it indicates whether it's valid. That means you've got a breach requiring investigation. It detects anomalies but doesn't necessarily point to what caused them. You still need to do that work. The solution is reasonably easy to administer. They made some changes last year, adding a cloud-based monitoring solution that makes deploying and monitoring our endpoints easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kaspersky offers more visible and comprehensive features compared to other products."

"It downloads essential security patches that are valuable for my PC."

"The advanced detection features are valuable."

"It is a secure solution with a lot of IT management features."

"It is a stable solution...It is a very scalable solution."

"The tool is easy to use."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"One of the good features is the provider's Faulting capability. If any of our systems detect malware, we can check the behavior of the malware by sending it to Kaspersky's sandbox environment. This helps us assess how destructive the malware is. After analyzing it, we can create use cases and protection measures based on that behavior. So, this is the best feature of Kaspersky."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response pros

"The biggest feature is that it hides everything from your operating system that's running in-memory from anything to try to run against it. That's the most unique thing that's on the market. There's nothing else out there that's quite like that. That's a big selling point and why we went with it. It does exactly what the design does. If you can't find it, you can't execute against it."

"Since using Morphisec we have seen a downturn in attacks because Morphisec protects us versus Defenders and whatnot that are signature-based. I know we have not had any issues with ransomware or other zero-day attacks that we've seen with machines that, all of a sudden, have become before we instituted the product. Now the machine had to be re-imaged and there was a loss of data because something was on the machine. You couldn't really determine what was on the machine because nothing was picking it up. The products we were using weren't picking it up."

"What's valuable is really the whole kit and caboodle of the Morphisec agent. What it does is genius, in a way, until the bad guys get wise to it. You set it up and then you watch the dashboard. There isn't really much tinkering."

"All the alerts are on the dashboard, which is quite simple and useful for us. You can easily check all the alerts that are being blocked or allowed, or whatever the action is. You can easily see that and you can take the necessary actions. You can add a PowerShell extension or any activities for blocking at your network level or for endpoints."

"Morphisec makes use of deterministic attack prevention that doesn’t require investigation of security alerts. It changes the memory locations of where certain applications run. If you think of Excel, opening a PDF, running an Excel macro, or opening a webpage and clicking on a link, all of those actions run in a certain area of memory. Morphisec changes the memory locations of where those run."

"The fact that Morphisec uses deterministic attack prevention that does not require human intervention has affected our security team's operations by making things much simpler. We don't have to really track down various alerts anymore, they've just stopped. At that point, we can go in and we can clean up whatever needs to be cleaned up. There are some things that Morphisec detects that we can't really remove, it's parts of Internet Explorer, but it's being blocked anyway. So we're happy with that."

"Morphisec has absolutely helped save money on our security stack. The ransomware at the end of the day can cost organizations millions upon millions of dollars. Investing in tools like Morphisec is a great reduction in that cost. If I can spend $10,000 in a year to protect assets that could be ransomed for $20,000,000, that's definitely a bet that one should pursue. Morphisec absolutely it's worth the investment."

"Morphisec makes it very easy for IT teams of any size to prevent breaches of critical systems because of the design of their tool. When we evaluated Morphisec, the CIO and I sat and listened. What attracted us to them is the fact that it stops activity at the point of detection. That saves a lot of time because now we are not investigating and trying to trace down what to turn off. We have already prevented it, which makes it very much safer and more secure."

More Morphisec pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in its user interface."

"Kaspersky is not an XDR solution. With an XDR solution, we could gain some more time."

"The solution must provide better security."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response lacks configuration options."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response needs vast resources on the central node. Not all maintenance tasks are in the GUI, so we often use commands. The lack of documentation for these processes means we frequently reach out to support, open tickets, and run complex CLI commands. It's not the most straightforward process. It should also improve stability."

"My team was struggling with the reporting when we were doing an audit. The console features are a little more interactive and user-friendly. There's some issue, or maybe some fixing has to be done."

"It needs improvement in communication between the network and endpoint, as well as between endpoint and server."

"Incorporating an AI protection tool with the capability to detect and prevent zero-day threats, particularly those with a five-star rating in terms of severity would be beneficial."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response cons

"From a company standpoint, a little more interaction with the customers throughout the year might be beneficial. I would like check-ins from the Morphisec account executives about any type of Morphisec news as well as a bit more interaction with customers throughout the year to know if anything new is coming out with Morphisec, e.g., what they are working on in regards to their development roadmap. We tend not to get that up until the time that we go for a yearly renewal. So, we end up talking to people from Morphisec once a year, but it is usually at renewal time."

"Some of the filters for the console need improvement. There are alerts that show up and just being able to acknowledge that we've seen those and not turn them off, but dismiss them, would be a huge benefit."

"We have discovered some bugs in the new releases that they've had to fix, so I would like to see more testing and QA on their side before they release."

"I haven't been able to get the cloud deployment to work. When there's an update, I'm supposed to be able to roll it out for the cloud solution, but right now I'm continuing to use our SCCM solution to update it."

"Morphisec is a venture startup. They are still early in their growth stage. They need to get mature on their customer support and on how they interface with system tools. For example, they need to get multifactor in place and an API for the major multi-factor systems, e.g., Okta, Duo, Ping, and Microsoft. They don't have them built in yet. They are working on them. It is just not there yet. Also, their stability, customer support, and processes need improvement, which is just part of maturity."

"If anything, tech support might be their weakest link. The process of getting someone involved sometimes takes a little time. It seems to me that they should have all the data they need to let me know whether an alert is legitimate or not, but they tend to need a lot of information from me to get to the bottom of something. It usually takes a little longer than I would expect."

"It would be nice if they could integrate Morphisec with other traditional antivirus solutions beyond Microsoft Defender. That is probably my biggest gripe."

"Those are some of the features that I was looking for on my on-prem platform that they've already instituted in the cloud and that I'm sure will be instituting on their on-prem platform as well. Having to have an on-prem server required a lot of administration. Being able to push that to the cloud and have it managed up there for us is a real nice addition."

More Morphisec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cheap."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"I was satisfied with the pricing of Kaspersky."

"I would say that their pricing is generally competitive and attractive."

"The pricing falls within the average range."

"I rate the solution's pricing model a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It is cost-effective in terms of services and features compared to other more expensive EDR solutions like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is definitely fair for what it does."

"We are still using a separate tool. I know for our 600 or I think we're actually licensed for up to 700 users, it runs me 23 or $24,000 a year. When you're talking to that many users plus servers being protected, that's well worth the investment for that dollar amount."

"Licenses are per endpoint, and that's true for the cloud version as well. The only difference is that there is a little extra charge for the cloud version."

"Our licensing is tied into our contract. Because we have a long-term contract, our pricing is a little bit lower. It is per year, so we don't get charged per endpoint, but we do have a cap. Our cap is 80 endpoints. If we were to go over 80, when we renewed our contract, which is not until three years are over. Then, they would reevaluate, and say, "Well, you have more than 80 devices active right now. This is going to be the price change." They know that we are installing and replacing computers, so the numbers will be all over the place depending on whether you archive or don't archive, which is the reason why we just have to keep up on that stuff."

"It does not have multi-tenants. If South Africa wants to show only the machines that they have, they need their own cloud incidence. It is not possible to have that in a single cloud incidence with multiple tenants in it, instead you need to have multiple cloud incidences. Then, if you have that, it will be more expensive. However, they are going to change that, which is good."

"It is a little bit more expensive than other security products that we use, but it does provide us good protection. So, it is a trade-off."

"It is an annual subscription basis per device. For the devices that we have in scope right now, it is about $25,000 a year."

"Morphisec is reasonably priced because our parent company's other subsidiaries use different products like CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is four or five times more expensive than Morphisec. The competitive pricing saves us money in our overall security stack."

More Morphisec pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

Kaspersky EDR offers automated response capabilities, enhancing efficiency by enabling quick investigation and response to potential threats on Android devices.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a very low-cost solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 63% of the time

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 13% of the time

ESET EDR/XDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Morphisec

Compared 24% of the time

Halcyon vs Morphisec

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Morphisec

Compared 11% of the time

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs Morphisec

Compared 10% of the time

Hyver vs Morphisec

Compared 9% of the time

More Morphisec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

August 2025

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response report

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec

August 2025

Download Morphisec product report

Also Known As

No data available

Morphisec, Morphisec Moving Target Defense

Overview

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides robust malware detection, endpoint security, integration with SIEM, control of USB devices, and behavior analysis, deployed on servers, mobile devices, and laptops.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids organizations in scanning environments, blocking sites, handling data transfers, and offering visibility into quarantine systems. Utilizing features such as encryption, machine learning analysis, caching, and automation, Kaspersky ensures enhanced security. The unified agent incorporates antivirus and EDR functionalities, centralizes management, and provides sandbox analysis alongside early-stage threat detection. Automated response capabilities improve efficiency, and the tool's lightweight nature maintains device performance despite high detection rates and advanced threat prevention mechanisms.

What are some of the key features?

Detailed malware information – Provides in-depth data on detected threats
Quick policy application – Enables fast implementation of security policies
Customizable reporting – Allows tailored reports to suit specific needs
Centralized management – Simplifies control over all endpoints
Sandbox analysis – Inspects suspicious files in an isolated environment
Early-stage threat detection – Identifies threats before they cause harm
Unified agent – Combines antivirus and EDR functionalities for comprehensive protection
Automated response – Enhances efficiency by automating threat responses

What are the benefits and ROI users should look for?

Enhanced security – Through advanced threat detection and prevention
Increased efficiency – Via automated responses to threats
Comprehensive protection – With the integration of antivirus and EDR features
Centralized control – Eases management of multiple endpoints
Reduced impact on device performance – Thanks to the tool's lightweight nature

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response can be implemented to protect sensitive data and critical systems against advanced threats. Financial institutions may leverage its high detection rates and behavior analysis to secure transactions and customer information. Healthcare organizations can utilize its sandbox analysis and early-stage threat detection to protect patient data. Retail businesses benefit from the enhanced security and efficient automated responses, ensuring customer data remains safe during transactions.

Kaspersky

Morphisec integrates seamlessly with platforms like Microsoft Defender, offering signatureless protection against zero-day threats and ransomware. It enhances existing endpoint solutions with minimal maintenance through its set-and-forget deployment, providing heightened security and reduced false positives.

Morphisec strengthens defense strategies by merging memory morphing and signatureless protection to effectively block zero-day attacks and ransomware. It operates efficiently within existing infrastructure, reducing system impact and maintenance needs. Users find its full visibility dashboard invaluable. Despite its strengths, cloud deployment and reporting features can be improved. Stability, alerts, and integration with other systems pose challenges for users, impacting usability and support quality.

What are Morphisec's key features?

Seamless Integration: Works with Microsoft Defender for comprehensive dashboard visibility
Memory Morphing: Hides processes to reduce attack surfaces
Signatureless Protection: Prevents threats without impacting performance
Automatic Threat Blocking: Uses inbuilt intelligence to detect risks
Set-and-Forget Deployment: Simplifies management and reduces maintenance

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Quick Deployment: Fast setup without disrupting operations
Enhanced Protection: Provides an additional defense layer against advanced threats
Cost-Effectiveness: Works with existing licenses, minimizing extra investments
Improved Compatibility: Integrates smoothly with current antivirus systems
Minimal System Impact: Operates efficiently without overloading resources

In security-focused industries, Morphisec is crucial for protecting workstations and servers against sophisticated attacks like ransomware. Its signatureless technology offers early threat detection, while compatibility with existing systems ensures seamless integration, providing advanced protection without additional licensing costs.

Morphisec

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Lenovo/Motorola, TruGreen, Covenant Health, Citizens Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Morphisec

July 2025

Free Report: Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Morphisec

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Morphisec and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Morphisec report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.