Jenkins vs LaunchDarkly comparison

Jenkins and LaunchDarkly are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Jenkins is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while LaunchDarkly is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Jenkins holds a 10.4% mindshare in BA, compared to LaunchDarkly’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Jenkins users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LaunchDarkly users who would recommend it.

Jenkins

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

4,156 Views
3,557 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

LaunchDarkly

Read 7 LaunchDarkly reviews

141 Views
37 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

LaunchDarkly

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and LaunchDarkly operate in the CI/CD pipeline and feature management sectors. LaunchDarkly excels over Jenkins with its advanced feature flagging capabilities, offering superior control over releases and experiments.

Features: Jenkins is known for automated builds, pipelines, and a broad plugin ecosystem. LaunchDarkly offers advanced feature management with feature flags, A/B testing, and real-time feedback on deployments.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could improve its deployment complexity and user interface to enhance user experience. Better documentation for easier navigation and configuration would be beneficial. Improving plugin reliability and integration processes can enhance its functionality. LaunchDarkly could focus on enhancing cost-effectiveness for smaller teams, expanding integration capabilities, and ensuring scalability for growing enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins involves complex setup and configuration, often requiring community support. LaunchDarkly provides streamlined deployment and dedicated customer support, ensuring a smoother implementation process.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins is open-source and cost-effective but may incur higher maintenance costs. LaunchDarkly follows a subscription model, which might have higher upfront costs, but its extensive features promise a favorable ROI through improved feature delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed Jenkins vs. LaunchDarkly Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. LaunchDarkly

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LaunchDarkly

Ranking in Build Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Jenkins is 10.4%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LaunchDarkly is 0.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Dinesh-Patil

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment

The dashboard needs to be improved. Though the access management and authentication functionalities are present, the dashboard and UI could be more user-friendly. The product has many plug-ins. Users have to go through the documentation to be able to use the product. The UI must be more user-friendly. The information should be available in the dashboard itself. The users shouldn’t have to refer to the documentation. When a user hovers over the elements on the dashboard, it should reveal information about them.

Read full review

James Bayhylle

Principal Technical Program Manager at ChowNow

Provides risk-free releases with control access and A/B testing

It allowed us to deploy faster. Despite having a rigorous code review process that slowed things down, once the code was reviewed, LaunchDarkly enabled safe deployments. If there was ever an issue, we could easily roll back a particular release by simply turning off the feature flag. When configuring and setting this up, begin with feature sets that are relatively small in scope. This helps build the necessary skills to leverage the product effectively while maintaining control over the blast radius, thus reducing risk to your customers and application in case of misconfiguration. As you gain more experience with the solution, it's crucial to have a process to manage feature flag sprawl, as mentioned earlier. Implementing a life cycle management system for your feature flags is essential. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten because of its intuitiveness and ease of use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Jenkins is free and open source."

"The initial setup is simple."

"Jenkins is a very mature product."

"Continuous Integration. Jenkins can integrate with almost any systems used for application development and testing, with its plugins."

"Has a good interface, is reliable and saves time."

"We use Jenkins to automatically build Python binaries into several OS's i.e. OS X, Ubuntu, Windows 32-bit and Windows 64-bit."

"We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load."

"This is a great integration tool and very powerful."

More Jenkins pros

"I appreciate that we can release any feature in production and maintain control over it."

"It has really helped during the series of product lines and faster deployment and faster development."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"I like that it offers the ability to control the flags."

"From the development side, it allows us to manage multiple things."

"The ability to turn off a flag is crucial when a task is not complete, especially if there is an error in a commit."

"The setup is easy."

Cons

"The solution could improve by having more advanced integrations."

"It would be helpful if they had a bit more interactive UI."

"Jenkins could improve the integration with other platforms."

"Jenkins could improve by adding the ability to edit test automation and make time planning better because it is difficult. It should be easier to do."

"The onboarding of Jenkins should be smoother, and it should have more pipelines available as it's deployed on many different servers."

"It could be cheaper."

"Creating a new SonarQube project requires a separate job, and we've encountered some integration issues with Docker and the need for better vulnerability checks."

"Developer documentation for plugins, plugin development, integrations: Sometimes it’s tricky to do pretty obvious things."

More Jenkins cons

"We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns."

"Fetching information about multiple flags in a single action would be beneficial."

"When the system has an excessive number of feature flags, managing them can become cumbersome."

"I strongly believe they need to develop a strategy for handling situations where LaunchDarkly goes down."

"The feature where one feature flag is dependent on another could be explored more for our usage."

"Right now, no improvements are needed."

"I have used LaunchDarkly for around two and a half years and I haven't faced any issues with it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source."

"Jenkins is an open-source tool."

"Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced."

"There is no cost. It is open source."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing."

"The tool is open-source."

"This is an open-source solution for the basic features. However, if an organization wishes to include specific functionality, outside of the basic package, there are extra costs involved."

"It is free."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LaunchDarkly?

I consider the pricing to be high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LaunchDarkly?

We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns. I would rate LaunchDarkly a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LaunchDarkly?

We use LaunchDarkly for managing feature flags. It helps manage the keys to control what users view on our screens.

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Harness vs LaunchDarkly

Compared 100% of the time

More LaunchDarkly Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

April 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

April 2025

Download LaunchDarkly product report

Overview

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

LaunchDarkly is acclaimed for its feature flag management, enabling safer, high-velocity code deployment and precise control over rollouts. Organizations use it to test, deploy, and manage features across user segments, performing canary releases and quick rollbacks without new code deployment. Users praise its robust flag system, real-time updates, detailed targeting, comprehensive analytics, and strong integration capabilities, significantly enhancing development efficiency and productivity.

LaunchDarkly

Sample Customers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. LaunchDarkly

April 2025

Free Report: Jenkins vs. LaunchDarkly

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins vs. LaunchDarkly and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jenkins vs. LaunchDarkly report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.