Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jedox Logo
1,096 views|826 comparisons
Qlik Logo
2,815 views|2,476 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jedox and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Performance Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The EPM is the most valuable feature.""The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage.""The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in.""We use the tool for performance management and planning.""The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department.""The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.""The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool.""The solution is very versatile."

More Jedox Pros →

"This is a very cool application with endless options of creativity and visuals.""Easy to analyze data by click-through.""It's pretty easy to deploy.""One of the good thing is that you can integrate different data source technologies. So you can model your environment without having any of our views running.""You can do a lot of things on the back end which are not possible in the other solutions on the market.""You can switch views easily.""The scalability is there.""E-T-L, The Extract, Transform, and Loading capabilities of QlikView make it a highly sophisticated self-service business intelligence tool for developers and analysts."

More QlikView Pros →

Cons
"Jedox should improve the design and server issues.""Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there.""More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help.""There is not much training for Jedox.""Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it.""From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process.""The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end.""There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

More Jedox Cons →

"Though the initial setup phase is simple, when it comes to the integration with the custom systems, the configuration and the compatibility sometimes take some more time.""The user interface and ease of use takes a bit of a learning curve to pick up.""The tool is expensive in Turkey.""I would like to see more advanced features from Qlik Sense integrated into QlikView to keep it competitive and up-to-date.""This solution would be improved with the inclusion of a feature that would allow us to add a common library of (our) commands used in load scripts and expressions, so with a keyword, we would get a drop down to select the command we are looking for, as opposed to the generic help.""There is no automation or drag and drop functionality.""Sometimes the filters are disappearing, and I'm not sure why this is happening.""For me, it is important to have a mix, what is the "view" and what is the "sense", Qlik Sense. They have two tools, but for me it is important to have only one tool, which combines the functions that we have from one side and the other side."

More QlikView Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."
  • "We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."
  • "Excellent value for money."
  • "The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."
  • "The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."
  • "Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."
  • More Jedox Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is a bit too high and I think licenses should be unlimited."
  • "QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."
  • "Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is too high compared to the other solutions on the market."
  • "It is not very expensive. I think it it is on par with other similar products on the market."
  • "The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."
  • "It has an annual license. It is expensive as compared to other competitive tools that do more for less. In South African rands, we pay about 100,000 to 200,000 a year."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."
  • More QlikView Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements.
    Top Answer:There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. The… more »
    Top Answer:If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.
    Top Answer:My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly.
    Top Answer:Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,096
    Comparisons
    826
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    521
    Rating
    8.2
    5th
    out of 50 in Reporting
    Views
    2,815
    Comparisons
    2,476
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    IBM Planning Analytics logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    Microsoft  Power BI logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Tableau logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Anaplan logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Oracle Hyperion logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Tableau logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Microsoft  Power BI logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Amazon QuickSight logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    TIBCO Spotfire logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Jedox EPM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

    QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

    Sample Customers
    BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever
    Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Retailer11%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Retailer6%
    Consumer Goods Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Performance Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jedox is ranked 3rd in Business Performance Management with 13 reviews while QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews. Jedox is rated 8.0, while QlikView is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jedox writes "Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". Jedox is most compared with IBM Planning Analytics, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion, whereas QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, SQL Server, Amazon QuickSight and TIBCO Spotfire.

    We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.