Jedox vs Oracle HFM comparison

Jedox and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7, while Oracle is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. Jedox holds a 5.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

813 Views
520 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle HFM

Read 15 Oracle HFM reviews

1,505 Views
1,044 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jedox

Oracle HFM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle HFM and Jedox are competing in the financial management solutions category. Jedox appears to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and scalability, offering a stronger price-to-value ratio with intuitive functionality and advanced analytics.

Features: Oracle HFM stands out with its financial consolidation capabilities, multi-currency functionalities, and comprehensive support for enterprise systems. Jedox is noted for its simplicity in data modeling, robust planning features, and seamless integration with existing databases.

Room for Improvement: Oracle HFM could improve by reducing the complexity of its deployment and increasing flexibility in customization. Jedox would benefit from enhancing its multi-currency capabilities, expanding its in-depth enterprise integration, and refining its advanced analytics features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle HFM requires significant infrastructure resources and expertise, leading to a more structured deployment process, while its customer service is responsive yet formal. Jedox allows for quicker implementation with flexible cloud-based or on-premises deployment, offering personalized customer service and collaborative tools.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle HFM involves higher upfront costs due to its comprehensive setup needs, leading to beneficial ROI when integrated into existing Oracle systems. Jedox offers lower initial costs through a subscription-based model, achieving faster ROI for businesses seeking efficient financial solutions across various budget levels.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. Oracle HFM Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle HFM

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,957 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle HFM

Ranking in Business Performance Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 5.5%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle HFM is 8.0%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Berge

Jedox Consultant at Qbit Aps

An easy-to-deploy product with a lot of useful tools and features that provides complete freedom to create solutions

I have worked with the solution for many years. I have worked several 1000 hours in Jedox. I really like the tool and its opportunities. It's evolving, improving, and adding new features. If someone is looking to use the product, they must reach out to a partner or consultant. When a solution has all the opportunities, it's not really a plug-and-play tool. They have some options for it. It is another good thing about Jedox. We can create certain models people often use, like cash flows and currency conversion. It doesn't need much configuring. We can just purchase on a subscription basis and start using some parts of it. If you want to start looking into it, you should definitely contact someone who's made large solutions to see all the opportunities that the tool has. It is vast. Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

AhmedHaridy

Managing Director at Emkan

Offers flexibility and ease of configuration

The initial setup of Oracle HFM is generally straightforward and not overly complex. The deployment time for Oracle HFM varies with the resources, but it usually takes around three to eight months, with an average of three to four months. The deployment process for Oracle HFM involves several key steps. It begins with the installation of Oracle software, followed by gathering requirements and relevant documents. These documents help define the report formats and service needs. Next, the team configures the system, starting with the enterprise structure, which needs to align with the ERP system. Data loading and configuration follow, with Oracle HFM typically requiring more resources compared to other systems like SuccessFactors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

"The solution is very versatile."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

More Jedox pros

"It is a very user-friendly software."

"You can bring in data from any source and from multiple sources, and you can consolidate that data in HFM."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Financial consolidation and reporting tool with good built-in features such as currency exchange and elimination."

"It is an expensive product but delivers what it promises, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risks associated with spreadsheets, and providing a better return on investment based on usage."

"The most valuable features are around consolidations, eliminations, conversions."

"The tool is stable."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility and ease of configuration in terms of testing and formula creation."

Cons

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"Jedox should improve the design and server issues."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

More Jedox cons

"In terms of improvement, one challenge with Oracle HFM is the need for technical knowledge in writing SQL syntax for custom extensions."

"The solution has integration challenges. We need a simple tool that is fool-proof for the data that is submitted not only for consolidation purposes but also for performance management and reporting purposes."

"The intercompany reporting function in this tool needs improvement, particularly being able to run reports in batches, rather than one at a time."

"Integration is an area where it lacks and can be improved."

"The complexity is okay. I don't see it as super complex. The solution could have more functionality to make it a little bit more flexible."

"If there could be data integration between HFM and the accounting software that would be ideal."

"It's a difficult process to try to edit, configure, or change the business rules that exist and work within HFM."

"Improvements can be made by possibly different interfaces to modernize it, more automation in scripting, and better integration with third-party solutions and reporting capabilities."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"Excellent value for money."

"Oracle Hyperion Financial Management (HFM) uses the named user licensing model. There's different pricing depending on HFM and Essbase planning."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Retailer

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jedox?

The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jedox?

The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jedox?

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. Th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle HFM?

The most valuable feature is the flexibility and ease of configuration in terms of testing and formula creation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle HFM?

It depends on the discount offered by Oracle. It is an expensive product but delivers what it promises, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risks associated with spreadsheets, and providing a ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle HFM?

Improvements can be made by possibly different interfaces to modernize it, more automation in scripting, and better integration with third-party solutions and reporting capabilities.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 15% of the time

Tableau vs Jedox

Compared 9% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 9% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Oracle Hyperion vs Oracle HFM

Compared 28% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Oracle HFM

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Oracle HFM

Compared 11% of the time

OneStream XF vs Oracle HFM

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs Oracle HFM

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle HFM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

June 2025

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle HFM

June 2025

Download Oracle HFM product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

HFM

Overview

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Jedox

Oracle Hyperion Financial Management is a financial consolidation and reporting application built with advanced Web technology. It provides financial managers the ability to rapidly consolidate and report financial results, meet global regulatory requirements, reduce the cost of compliance and deliver confidence in the numbers.

Oracle

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

B&B Hotels, Goldwind, Drake & Scull

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle HFM

June 2025

Free Report: Jedox vs. Oracle HFM

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. Oracle HFM and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. Oracle HFM report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.