Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management vs VEERUM DigitalTWIN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VEERUM DigitalTWIN
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
45th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

IanCampbell - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides simple module navigation
The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is the ability to navigate through the module The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would. I have been using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset…
Use VEERUM DigitalTWIN?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
860,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: June 2025.
860,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.