Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs SnaPatch comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...
Ranking in Patch Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SnaPatch
Ranking in Patch Management
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AlfonsoNaranjo - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 21, 2023
A hybrid solution for patching with reporting feature but lack support
I provide the customer with the steps to follow, and they follow their scheduling and procedures. I also provide the information to the people involved in the pilot. My role is solely to provide a technical approach. The client decides how to handle communications, reputation management, etc. I provide a technical perspective. The solution’s effectiveness depends on the reliability of the computers and their agents. If the computers are not functioning properly, the agents may not receive policies from the cloud, and patches may not be deployed as expected. The time it takes for policies to reach computers and be executed can vary depending on the specific circumstances. While the cloud component of the solution is consistently reliable, the client-side components can be more unpredictable. They can do their on-premises patching capabilities in Intune if they have a well-established and functioning IT infrastructure. Similarly, implementing a patching solution from Intune is very easy for new organizations starting from scratch. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Use SnaPatch?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
"The solution is expensive compared to other products."
"The solution is affordable."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Windows?
We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.
What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?
There are some issues in the on-premises infrastructure of the clients.
What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?
I provide the customer with the steps to follow, and they follow their scheduling and procedures. I also provide the information to the people involved in the pilot. My role is solely to provide a ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Presbyterian Church
1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. VMware 10. Adobe 11. Autodesk 12. Canonical 13. CentOS 14. Dell 15. HP 16. IBM 17. JetBrains 18. Linux Mint 19. MongoDB 20. Red Hat 21. SUSE 22. Ubuntu 23. VMware 24. XenServer 25. Zimbra
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: October 2024.
812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.