Invicti vs NGINX App Protect comparison

Invicti and F5 are both solutions in the Container Security category. Invicti is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while F5 is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.4. Invicti holds a 0.9% mindshare in Container Security, compared to F5’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

5,070 Views
1,115 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

NGINX App Protect

Read 27 NGINX App Protect reviews

3,431 Views
721 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Invicti

NGINX App Protect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Invicti and NGINX App Protect are competing in the web application security space. Invicti tends to have an advantage in pricing and support, while NGINX App Protect offers superior features that make it a worthwhile investment for many.

Features: Invicti provides thorough vulnerability detection, API testing capabilities, and an intuitive interactive interface. Its proof-based scanning and minimal manual intervention enhance security assessments. NGINX App Protect integrates seamlessly with cloud-native environments, offers advanced API security management, and includes strong traffic management and auto-learning features to safeguard applications.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could improve its integration with cloud environments, enhance API security options, and extend its vulnerability confirmation processes. NGINX App Protect might benefit from more straightforward deployment for smaller environments, a simplified configuration process for basic setups, and enhanced support documentation to ease integration complexities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is praised for its quick configuration and simple deployment adaptable to various environments, with efficient customer support. NGINX App Protect has a robust integration process, particularly beneficial for those using NGINX servers, supported by strong customer service, which helps navigate its complex setup requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti offers a cost-effective solution that often delivers significant ROI through its automated processes and comprehensive testing. NGINX App Protect may have higher initial costs, but these are offset by its enhanced protection capabilities and integration benefits, providing a substantial return on investment for organizations requiring deep integration and robust feature sets.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. NGINX App Protect Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. NGINX App Protect

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Container Security

24th

Ranking in API Security

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

NGINX App Protect

Ranking in Container Security

28th

Ranking in API Security

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Invicti is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NGINX App Protect is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	0.9%
NGINX App Protect	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Valerio Guaglianone

Dev Ops Engineer at adesso AG

Long-term web protection has supported reliable traffic management but needs a simpler interface

NGINX App Protect is a good product. I have used both versions from F5 -also the free version- (I mean the NGINX/NGINX One/App Protect free trial period), and I think it is a good product. It's stable, affordable, and easy to manage. NGINX App Protect is a comprehensive security solution that combines advanced WAF, DoS protection, API security, and DevSecOps automation in a lightweight, scalable package ideal for modern cloud-native architectures. The adaptive machine learning capabilities are truly commendable, as the solution can establish traffic baselines and detect anomalies in real time. It automatically adjusts security policies, minimizing the need for manual intervention and reducing false positives. Additionally, it supports scalable deployment across diverse environments, including on-premises, cloud, Kubernetes, and containers, offering both flexibility and scalability I have experience with the web server, F5 load balancer, and similar products provided by Ergon, for eg. the web application firewall and the Microgateway for K8S. I'm also familiar with F5 BIG-IP products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is very professional, 10/10."

"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"It is a very good tool."

"NetSparker is a very easy to use and understand product."

"We use simultaneous products, but I found this to be the best of the lot."

"I would definitely recommend to those who really want to know in-depth details of their applications/products regarding the security of their web system."

More Invicti pros

"NGINX App Protect's best features are auto-learning, which creates a profile of applications that are deployed, bot protection, and force protection, which lets you configure your brute force policy and alert for and prevent brute force attacks."

"I really love NGINX App Protect; I love the functionality, the ease of implementation, the very user-friendly Instance Manager, and its integration with DevOps, and as an NGINX Ingress controller using the Plus certificate it is working perfectly and making things a lot easier than the regular one while successfully stopping threats like injection, running scripts, and SQL injections."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the OWASP certification. Additionally, the tool's ability to enforce strong passwords and OTP within minutes is impressive. With its analytics and recommendations, it is a very good solution."

"This solution provides perfect protection for the published services against all application attacks."

"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its open source."

"NGINX App Protect has positively impacted my organization by adding an additional layer of security on top of my infrastructure layer, which I consider quite helpful."

"The stability of the product is very impressive since it handles 60,000 to 70,000 requests or transactions per second."

"This solution is very much stable."

More NGINX App Protect pros

Cons

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"Asset scanning could be better. Once, it couldn't scan assets, and the issue was strange. The price doesn't fit the budget of small and medium-sized businesses."

"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement."

"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."

"The custom attack preparation screen might be improved."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

More Invicti cons

"As far as scalability, it takes a long time for deployment."

"The contributions I think sometimes take a toll on you like you're going to spend a lot of time on the right contributions."

"They could provide a better user interface."

"Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time."

"NGINX App Protect could improve security."

"The setup of NGINX App Protect is complex. The full process took one week to complete. Additionally, we had to change the network infrastructure platform which took one month."

"The dashboard could provide a more comprehensive view of the status of the connections."

"The support from NGINX App Protect is too expensive."

More NGINX App Protect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"There are no additional fees."

"The price of NGINX App Protect is approximately $3,000 annually. All of our licenses are observed by a managed service partner."

"The price of NGINX App Protect is not much different from the products that fall under the leader category of Gartner Magic Quadrant."

"NGINX App Protect is expensive."

"Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."

"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"NGINX is not expensive."

More NGINX App Protect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX App Protect?

I will not be able to answer about my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for NGINX App Protect, as something different handles that in my team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NGINX App Protect?

I did not face any issues with NGINX App Protect. The only issue that we had is that someone was trying to install the POC for the customer, and he by mistake installed the Instance Manager on the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NGINX App Protect?

I have been dealing with NGINX App Protect and the WAF policy. I usually recommend NGINX App Protect for banking and telecom, and for anyone that has their own database or servers that they host we...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 9% of the time

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

AWS WAF vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 7% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 6% of the time

Haltdos Enterprise WAF vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NGINX App Protect

Compared 5% of the time

More NGINX App Protect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

May 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

NGINX App Protect

April 2026

Download NGINX App Protect product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall

Overview

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Invicti

NGINX App Protect offers comprehensive security features like auto-learning and bot protection. Its real-time threat detection and ease of integration make it suitable for web and mobile application security across on-premises, cloud, and container environments.

NGINX App Protect stands out with its adaptive machine learning, scalable deployment options, and robust API connectivity, offering Layer 7 DDoS protection and an OWASP-certified WAF. While it supports comprehensive traffic and security management, enhancements in platform integration, automation, and technical support could improve usability. The pricing model and policy management options could also see refinement. Commonly employed in securing web and mobile applications, it addresses threats including OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and DDoS attacks, while providing seamless integration with Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines.

What are the key features of NGINX App Protect?

Auto-learning: Adapts to evolving threat landscapes.
Bot and Force Protection: Prevents unauthorized access efficiently.
Integration with DevOps: Streamlines security within CI/CD pipelines.
Adaptive Machine Learning: Continuously enhances threat recognition.
Scalable Deployment: Easily manages growing demand across environments.
Traffic and Security Management: Ensures secure data flow.
Command-line Interface: Offers efficient control and management.
OWASP Certification: Meets top industry security standards.
API Connectivity: Facilitates communication between components.
Layer 7 DDoS Protection: Safeguards against complex attacks.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Enhanced Security: Reliable protection against major vulnerabilities.
Effective Traffic Management: Balances load efficiently.
Ease of Implementation: Simple integration saves time and effort.
Operational Scalability: Supports growth across all environments.
Comprehensive Threat Detection: Real-time monitoring minimizes risks.
Flexible Policy Options: Tailors security measures to specific needs.

NGINX App Protect finds broader use in sectors like banking and telecommunications, where it secures high-performance digital infrastructures. Its application spans perimeter security, load balancing, and acts as a reverse proxy in environments necessitating stringent security, high throughput, and robust management. The tool's adaptability facilitates its deployment alongside containers, ensuring compatibility with contemporary development practices.

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. NGINX App Protect

April 2026

Free Report: Invicti vs. NGINX App Protect

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. NGINX App Protect and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. NGINX App Protect report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors and best API Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.