Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs Pyramid Analytics comparison

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 8 Pyramid Analytics reviews

804 Views
531 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and Pyramid Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Pyramid Analytics Report (Updated: June 2025).

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Pyramid Analytics

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), GRC (21st), Quality Management Software (18th), Document Management Software (20th)

Pyramid Analytics

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.0%. The mindshare of Pyramid Analytics is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Shyam Pendyala

Manager, BI Platforms at Refinitiv, an LSEG Business at LSEG (London Stock Exchange Group)

A comprehensive and user-friendly business intelligence for enhanced data insight

When developing multidimensional IMDS models in Pyramid Analytics, there is a need for better features to maintain and analyze data. The application currently lacks the ability to easily track the original physical table and field names, making it challenging to relate them to business names. It would be desirable to have the possibility to generate a data dictionary, detailing the original physical tables, renamed fields, and derived fields. Such features would simplify documentation, facilitate understanding of how calculations depend on physical fields and aid in explaining the development process to others. Having this lineage and easy-to-generate data dictionary would greatly enhance the usability of Pyramid Analytics for developers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"The on-premise version has quite good scalability."

"It proved to be a very powerful and useful tool due to its breakdown capabilities, easy reporting features, flexibility in building custom calculations, and the ability to integrate them into reports."

"It offers a wide range of analytics options including statistics and visualizations, as well as prediction capabilities, allowing users to make forecasts based on the latest data."

"It seems quite performant in analyzing multi-dimensional information sets and presenting them."

"The most valuable feature of Pyramid Analytics, outshining even top-tier platforms like Power BI, is its robust support for DAX queries."

"The features I find most valuable are 'Discover,' 'Formulate,' and 'Model.' I use them regularly to build logic and create reports for my job."

"Pyramid has a wide level of uses, as it's a complete ETL process and has a good level of connecting to a lot of data sources."

"I think the most valuable Pyramid Analytics feature is the solution's ability to drill down and dice in the loop. I think it is better than InExcel or Power BI."

Cons

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"It would be desirable to have the possibility to generate a data dictionary, detailing the original physical tables, renamed fields, and derived fields."

"I think the graphic number of charts and components could be higher, at least comparable to Brain Power BI."

"Pyramid Analytics could improve by speeding up data refresh, especially for large datasets."

"There is room for improvement in terms of the user interface, particularly when it comes to modifying connections between filters and visual components in a dashboard."

"I find that this is quite a heavy, time-consuming tool for developers."

"There is room for improvement in terms of documentation and examples, especially for newcomers like me who are learning both business intelligence and Pyramid."

"The general amount of negative comments that I am hearing from my team makes me very wary."

"Even though the solution has a functionality for every step, it's not so well- defined. That needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

"The licensing cost is not excessively expensive, but it does increase with the addition of new features and modules."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

What do you like most about Pyramid Analytics?

The most valuable feature of Pyramid Analytics, outshining even top-tier platforms like Power BI, is its robust support for DAX queries.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pyramid Analytics?

I find the price of Pyramid Analytics to be quite reasonable, especially when compared to other tools in the industry. It is a cost-effective choice, particularly for mid-sized or larger companies ...

What needs improvement with Pyramid Analytics?

Pyramid Analytics could improve by speeding up data refresh, especially for large datasets. While it is currently an in-memory tool, efforts are underway to enhance direct connections to source sys...

Microsoft Power BI vs Pyramid Analytics

Comparisons

No data available

Compared 56% of the time

Tableau vs Pyramid Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

Databricks vs Pyramid Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Superset vs Pyramid Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Pyramid Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

More Pyramid Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

June 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Download Pyramid Analytics product report

May 2025

Also Known As

Enterprise Process Center

No data available

Overview

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

The BI Office from Pyramid Analytics is a web-based governed data discovery and analytics platform. It integrates the four principal functions of any comprehensive BI strategy into a single, seamless application. Users can now analyze, present, report and predict on their data in a single application. Pyramid Analytics has native apps to cover the entire mobile spectrum, iOS, Android and Windows. With BI Office users can integrate SAP data with data from other sources giving them the right tools and better data to make data-driven decisions.

Sample Customers

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

US Department of Veterans Affair, Volkswagen, Siemens, Blackboard, Hallmark, Orange, CDW, LA Fitness, Atelier GS, Memorial Healthcare, Acadia Insurance, BancoBic, Advanced Learning, Microsoft, Drake University