We performed a comparison between Intercept X Endpoint and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA."Intercept X's smart prevention it's very good as so are its machine learning capabilities for troubleshooting channels and files."
"It's quite simple to use and user friendly."
"Since it's cloud-managed, the solution is easy to administer, especially if the person using it is in a different geophysical location."
"I am impressed with the tool's common dashboard feature. The solution is also easy to deploy and manage. Reporting is also easy with the software."
"Sophos Intercept X is easy to install and has a lower price than similar solutions."
"This product integrates well with Sophos firewalls and should be seriously considered by Sophos Firewall clients."
"Offers artificial intelligence, security metrics and a lot of information gathered to make decisions."
"We find the app control and its threat protection to be the best features."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"Technical support can be improved. There could be shared support, i.e. where someone in Egypt can respond."
"This solution is not in the high ratings on many of the top review sites. This solution has to be near the top for me to continue using it."
"When we load Intercept X, it puts a load on the device. When it is scanning, it slows down the device. A system with basic specifications completely slows down till the scan is complete. They should improve this part."
"Sophos has a lot of different features. Some of them are tied to different clients, which may mean that different prices or licenses have to be added on. It can be a little bit confusing if you're not familiar with the logic of how they work. They can make it a little bit clearer."
"Sophos Intercept X doesn't have its own firewall that utilizes the Windows Firewall or intrusion prevention."
"It could be a bit easier to implement."
"Deployment on cloud needs to be carried out manually."
"The product’s DDoS and AI features must be improved."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
Earn 20 points
Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 8th in ZTNA with 101 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 20th in ZTNA. Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "A standard offering with good threat analysis but reduces machine performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.