We performed a comparison between Instana Infrastructure Monitoring and Nutanix Prism based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The product's initial setup is easy."
"Simplicity of use."
"The HTML5 interface is very robust."
"The pricing is very good if you compare it to other competitors."
"In the six years we have been using Nutanix Prism, we have never had a problem with stability."
"Prism's best features include the single point of failure (SPOF) and ease of implementation."
"Duplication and compression work for data in a hybrid solution."
"I am very satisfied with the technical support."
"Everything has been valuable, without a doubt the server is self-managed with Prism in an efficient way, it solves possible logical errors to maintain production without interruptions, it's great."
"Instana Infrastructure Monitoring needs to support monitoring of the .NET framework since it is one of the areas where the solution currently has shortcomings."
"When we get a request from a user for a file-level recovery, there are self-recovery options, but they only work if the replication is available to that cluster locally... In VMware, we could restore a VM and attach the hard drive to any other server and copy the file easily. But that kind of facility is not available in AHV."
"The replication we have does not have any backup systems built-in. We have to separate license records for backup, like onboard. We would like to have this in a future release."
"Nutanix Prism can be more stable because it's not as stable as VMware."
"The solution could be a bit more user-friendly. The dashboard and configuration should be much easier to use."
"No integration of commands to manage AHV."
"The automation needs to be improved, as there are several challenges."
"The VM backup could be better, and its licensing could be better. We have had some licensing issues with Nutanix Files. The default license should be 1 TB or more. Currently, for Nutanix Files sharing, we can only use 500 Gigabytes."
"We definitely have some issues with Nutanix Prism. Our main issue is that we cannot operate the database. It would seem that less configuration would be desirable, because between Nutanix and the Oracle database on Windows, there tends to be problems."
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is ranked 43rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review while Nutanix Prism is ranked 4th in Virtualization Management Tools with 57 reviews. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is rated 9.0, while Nutanix Prism is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Instana Infrastructure Monitoring writes "A reasonably stable and scalable tool for monitoring purposes with an easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Prism writes "Having a centralized platform for infrastructure information has helped us with capacity planning". Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is most compared with Zabbix, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM), Amazon CloudWatch, Checkmk and Opsview, whereas Nutanix Prism is most compared with Zabbix, VMware Aria Operations, Cisco UCS Manager, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) and Veeam ONE.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
