Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Informatica and Tricentis are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Informatica Test Data Manag...

Read 13 Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) reviews

1,212 Views
1,006 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

19,388 Views
7,367 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Informatica Test Data Manag...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Test Data Manag...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Data Management (4th)

Tricentis Tosca

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

Raj Sethupathi

Data Integration Consultant GCP/AWS at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Seamlessly connects with the ETL engine and has its own policy pack, reducing the need for custom coding

I've only worked with versions 9.7 and 10.5.1, and I'm not familiar with the newest features in the current version, 10.5.1. However, I'm sure they have incorporated AI capabilities, as that is the current industry trend. It is this new buzzword. Informatica itself introduced CLAIRE AI. I am four versions behind. So, it would be good if I upgraded. Plus, Informatica has rebranded this TDM. It's not even originally from Informatica. They purchased the company that makes the application around 2010. Informatica has purchased so many companies for different purposes, like business-to-business, test data management, and more. They change the trade name so frequently. It used to be ILM, Informatica Lifecycle Management, then they changed it to something else, then Test Data Management, and then Security Governance and Policy Management or something like that. It's all different names for the same product. Frequent rebranding and name changes can create confusion for customers.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A very user friendly tool and it’s not mandatory to be technical to use it."

"Informatica is highly scalable."

"Informatica Test Data Management is a complete solution. I'm not very deep in the technical aspect of the solution, but most of the workflows are now completely automated. There are some minor elements where we have to still add manual parts to the implementation."

"Informatica Test Data Management is a complete solution; I'm not very deep in the technical aspect of the solution, but most of the workflows are now completely automated."

"The most valuable feature of TDM is its ability to mask data while maintaining referential integrity."

"Dynamic data masking is a valuable feature of this product."

"We do not need to write complex SQL statements as the solution provides a GUI to perform activities."

"The tool enabled us to leverage Teradata Parallel Transporter to write the masked data efficiently to our Teradata warehouse."

More Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) pros

"The platform's most valuable feature is model-based testing, which is effective for test case design and optimization."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The reporting is really nice."

"The initial setup isn't too difficult."

"Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases."

"Tricentis Tosca has completely met our requirements."

"I face no challenges or stability issues."

"The XScan was great because it was a handy way to automate on a surface which made it very easy and simple."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"Data discovery and the built in policy packs are very simple; they need stronger ones."

"There is a lag while opening the console, which is a concern from my end."

"Informatica has a data governance suite, and at the moment, there is no connection between the data governance elements, such as the data catalog, and the Informatica Test Data Management software. For example, the data discovery which is part of both solutions is two separate things. If you have a data discovery in the data catalog, then we cannot use it for Informatica Test Data Management purposes and vice versa. The same software vendor, has two different products, with the same functionality. There's was no need to separate things. This is something which was a problem in a use case of the customer where this was the reason why they didn't choose the Informatica solution."

"When it came time to upgrade from 9.7 to 10.1, we could upgrade all the other products, but there was an issue with TDM. It seemed like they weren't ready for the upgrade."

"A lot of improvement is needed, mainly due to the fact that the tool is very slow."

"They have to create more transformations that can be utilized in the tool."

"The response from Informatica support was nil."

"It should enable DevOps in CI/CD environments There should be compatibility with big data in SAP environments: These are most widely used in the enterprise level of the organization"

More Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) cons

"It needs better integration with JIRA."

"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."

"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."

"Many times when we have raised a ticket, we did not get an urgent response."

"The main area where there is room for improvement is how they do upgrades."

"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."

"Many times when we have raised a ticket, we did not get an urgent response."

"Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive because the license needs to be bought for some time period. It's not pay as you go."

"The cost is not an issue for enterprises, but for smaller businesses, it could be."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"If you are purchasing less than five licenses, then the pricing is high. On a scale from one to ten, with one being low and ten being high pricing, I would rate this solution at eight."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"The pricing and licensing of Tricentis Tosca were alright. Many customers look for end-to-end enterprise solutions, there were not many challenges with the pricing. However, the customers who are coming from Selenium or similar, feel they're paying a premium for this Tricentis Tosca license. If the right person is there for the implementation of the Tricentis Tosca, then it is one of the best tools in the market."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

12%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?

A lot of improvement is needed, mainly due to the fact that the tool is very slow. There are numerous issues, and we have reported these to the Informatica vendor. They don't seem to be focusing mu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?

We cannot provide production data to our testing teams, so we use TDM to encrypt or mask the data and create a copy for them. Many teams rely on our data, and TDM helps maintain data security by ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?

TDM is a worthwhile recommendation if the customer is interested, but for small-scale companies that do not want to spend a lot, it might be too costly. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Perforce Delphix vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 30% of the time

BMC AMI DevX vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 15% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 11% of the time

K2View vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 7% of the time

More Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)

April 2026

Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) report

Download Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Informatica TDM

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Informatica TDM empowers testing teams to generate test data sets for both simple and complex test case scenarios; spot and address data privacy risks with a complete library of prepackaged data masking algorithms; and define and reuse test data subset and masking policies across multiple applications and locations without the need to recode.

Informatica

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Vale, Hot Telecommunication

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.