InfluxDB vs Redgate Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

InfluxData and Redgate are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. InfluxData is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1, while Redgate is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.3. InfluxData holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Redgate’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Redgate users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

8,219 Views
2,466 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Redgate Monitor

Read 3 Redgate Monitor reviews

1,366 Views
1,339 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Redgate Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

InfluxDB and Redgate Monitor compete in data monitoring and management. InfluxDB holds an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Redgate Monitor stands out with extensive features, justifying its higher price.

Features: InfluxDB offers efficient time-series data handling, scalability, and open-source flexibility. Redgate Monitor provides specialized SQL Server monitoring, intuitive alerting systems, and robust reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfluxDB supports diverse cloud environments, ensuring versatility. Redgate Monitor focuses on SQL Server environments with tailored deployment, supported by accessible documentation and responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB provides a cost-effective setup with sustainable ROI using open-source models. Redgate Monitor's higher initial costs are countered by advanced SQL monitoring, enhancing database performance insights.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. Redgate Monitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Redgate Monitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), Network Monitoring Software (14th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Redgate Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

47th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redgate Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.8%
Redgate Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Micah Richards

Senior Software Engineer at Unisys

Centralized monitoring has reduced outages and enables faster diagnosis across all database servers

The best features Redgate Monitor offers include detailed resource monitoring, instant alerts, and easy customization. A user can quickly see how your server is performing and which queries are taking the longest. The instant alerts and customizable options help since it is a multiple-platform database observability for the entire estate. I use this to optimize performance, ensure security, and mitigate potential risks with fast, deep-dive analysis and intelligent alerting. I love Redgate Monitor because it helps manage an entire database estate from a single pane of glass. Redgate Monitor has positively impacted my organization by creating database observability to proactively mitigate potential risks with instant problem diagnosis and customizable alerting. It accelerates daily database maintenance by automating time-consuming manual tasks, such as identifying long-running queries or tracking blocked processes, which frees up time to proactively improve the performance and security of servers. I have seen time savings from twenty percent to forty-five percent. It also helps to minimize downtime.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very powerful."

"Because of reduced downtime, we benefit greatly from receiving alerts in advance."

"InfluxDB's best feature is that it's a cloud offering. Other good features include its time-series DB, fast time-bulk queries, and window operations."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data from servers. It must be installed on Windows or Linux servers. During installation, ensure that the configuration file is correct to prevent issues. Once data is collected, it can be sent to InfluxDB. For visualization, you can use open-source tools like Grafana."

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

"Based on InfluxDB, we have great analytics produced by our SRE team, and with that, we have an alerting and monitoring system in place."

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

More InfluxDB pros

"Overall, I truly love Redgate Monitor and would recommend it to anyone in database administration, but I also recognize that improvements and upgrades, especially concerning its AI features, are essential for ongoing development."

"Redgate Monitor has positively impacted my organization by creating database observability to proactively mitigate potential risks with instant problem diagnosis and customizable alerting."

"Redgate Monitor has impacted our organization positively by helping us simplify day-to-day tasks and realize a feeling of security."

Cons

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"The solution's UI can be more user-friendly."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"Customer support is fair enough but can be improved."

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"However, I do wish the documentation and community resources around Flux were more extensive and beginner-friendly."

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"I chose an 8 out of 10 because there is room for improvement, such as regarding backups and enhanced security through other types of authentication or encrypted data in TLS."

More InfluxDB cons

"Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I must say I don't favor the subscription model, and the price is somewhat higher."

"It is a bit expensive for MSPs to use for their day-to-day monitoring."

"For improvement, I think Redgate Monitor's alert customization depth could be enhanced; I would appreciate more granular control over notification rules such as user permissions and alert grouping, as well as attention towards resource usage since Redgate Monitor can be resource-intensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The tool is an open-source product."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Redgate Monitor?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I consider it a fair amount; my peers also feel that it falls within a comfortable range.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Redgate Monitor?

For improvement, I think Redgate Monitor's alert customization depth could be enhanced; I would appreciate more granular control over notification rules such as user permissions and alert grouping,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Redgate Monitor?

I mainly use Redgate Monitor for day-to-day activity, including tasks like backup, performance tuning, and slow-running queries, and it has been very helpful for me for various purposes such as ale...

See all answers

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Datadog vs Redgate Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Zabbix vs Redgate Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

New Relic vs Redgate Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Nagios Core vs Redgate Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs Redgate Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Redgate Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

September 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Redgate Monitor

September 2026

Download Redgate Monitor product report

Overview

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

Redgate Monitor provides database administrators with real-time SQL Server insights, ensuring optimal performance and streamlined operations.

Designed for database professionals, Redgate Monitor offers comprehensive diagnostics and detailed analysis, reducing administrative overhead and improving SQL Server performance. Its intuitive tools facilitate rapid issue identification and resolution, leading to enhanced system reliability.

What are the key features of Redgate Monitor?

Real-Time Monitoring: Constantly tracks SQL Server activity for instant anomaly detection.
Alerting System: Sends customized alerts to address potential issues promptly.
Performance Analytics: Detailed analytics provide a deep dive into performance metrics.
Query Performance Analysis: Offers insights into query behavior for performance optimization.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor dashboards to focus on critical performance indicators.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines database management, freeing up resources.
Cost Savings: Reduces downtime and enhances resource allocation.
Reliability: Enhances database stability and minimizes disruption risks.
Scalability: Supports expanding infrastructures with ease.
User Satisfaction: Offers features that align with user preferences.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, where data integrity and uptime are crucial, Redgate Monitor implementations lead to significant productivity and compliance benefits, ensuring databases are efficiently managed while maintaining strict regulatory requirements.

Redgate

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

1. Microsoft 2. Amazon 3. Google 4. Facebook 5. Apple 6. IBM 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. Cisco 10. Intel 11. Adobe 12. Salesforce 13. Netflix 14. Twitter 15. LinkedIn 16. Uber 17. Airbnb 18. Spotify 19. Dropbox 20. Pinterest 21. Snapchat 22. Tesla 23. HP 24. Dell 25. Sony 26. Samsung 27. General Electric 28. Siemens 29. Volkswagen 30. BMW 31. Toyota 32. Coca-Cola

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Redgate Monitor

September 2026

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. Redgate Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. Redgate Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. Redgate Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.