InfluxDB vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

InfluxData and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. InfluxData is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kaseya is ranked #58 with an average rating of 8.0. InfluxData holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 17 InfluxDB reviews

3,182 Views
573 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

961 Views
788 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfluxDB and Kaseya Traverse compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management category. While InfluxDB offers competitive pricing and efficient data handling, Kaseya Traverse holds the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set for organizations prioritizing extensive service visibility.

Features: InfluxDB is valued for real-time time-series data collection, high-performance querying, and handling high data ingestion rates. Kaseya Traverse is known for holistic infrastructure monitoring, capacity planning, and dynamic service-impact capabilities, offering actionable insights vital for IT operations management.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could enhance its integration options, user interface, and analytical features. Kaseya Traverse might improve in simplifying its deployment process, expanding its feature training resources, and offering better customization options for diverse IT environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfluxDB provides straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and community support, making it easy for developers to start integrating time-series data solutions. Kaseya Traverse has a more nuanced deployment process supported by responsive technical service and customer-focused support, designed to handle the complexities of full-scale IT operations.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB is appealing for its lower setup cost and flexible pricing, ideal for businesses requiring scalable data processing solutions. Kaseya Traverse has a higher initial investment but offers improved ROI through extensive monitoring and automation features, justifying the cost for enterprises needing robust infrastructure monitoring solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (2nd), Open Source Databases (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (21st), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

58th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
InfluxDB	0.3%
Kaseya Traverse	0.5%
Other	99.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

"InfluxDB's best feature is that it's a cloud offering. Other good features include its time-series DB, fast time-bulk queries, and window operations."

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

"Overall, InfluxDB delivered excellent performance, stability, and simplicity for telemetry-driven use cases."

"The solution is very powerful."

More InfluxDB pros

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"If it gets a little bit more into the metric side, then it would really be great, similar to Prometheus."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"However, I cannot ignore the challenges I faced while configuring the database with my message brokers, whether Rabbit or Kafka, because the documentation is not properly provided."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"The interface of InfluxDB is so complex and should be made easier for non-technical people."

More InfluxDB cons

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

Although I didn't encounter any significant challenges, I think that if there was a NoSQL version of InfluxDB, that would also help because I have used the SQL version. I wish InfluxDB were also av...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB involved working on a LEO satellite KPI monitoring application, where I gathered latency, throughput, packet loss, jitter, and various types of network data for severa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 18% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 11% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 18% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 13% of the time

DX Performance Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

January 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

January 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure.

IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks.

Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance

Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.

Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users.

Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.

Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxData

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.