We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."DDoS protection and WAF are the most valuable features. It is easy to deploy a service. It is easy and quick to deploy to a new website."
"Simplifies putting everything in code."
"It is an effective threat mitigation tool."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code."
"We have peace of mind that nobody will use malware on us or try to hack our website."
"Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high."
"The solution has a very good interface."
"It has kept us up and operational on a day-to-day basis, without being interrupted by an attack from outside sources."
"The important features include automated protection and defense against many attacks, it's important that our networks are protected in the Radware cloud."
"The pricing is reasonable. It's not overly expensive."
"A flexible affordable solution for defense against DDos attacks."
"SSL-based mitigation from DDoS attacks is good from their side. They are capable of preventing SSL-based attacks with certifications and everything loaded onto them."
"Its functionality is very good."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"It has not gone down for a quite long time. It's working fine."
"A limited tool if you're looking to customize."
"I am not sure if this application has a policy where you can create your custom policy and run it as our firewall. We should have some ability to also create some custom policy, then run it as a firewall."
"The weakest point of Imperva is their first level of support, which should be improved. They should also improve the access and security logs viewing directly on the portal. I would like to see better access and security logs through the portal and not only through a SIM solution. Currently, if you want to explore your access and security logs from Imperva, you need a SIM tool or a SIM infrastructure on your side to do it. You can't do it manually or directly through the portal, which is a big problem for us. I had a call yesterday with Imperva for the roadmap, and I just told them this. They agreed that this is an improvement point from their side."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"Incapsula services also provides load balancing services for their service IP address environment. So far, with monitoring their services, the IP address was only changed once."
"It's quite expensive."
"The inability to access local technical support during our business hours poses a significant inconvenience."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"I had some trouble in the registration account prior to deployment, but it was fixed. They were not very fast or responsive, however. It took about one week to resolve the issue."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
"APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information."
"I would like to see more focus on layer seven protection."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"If they would go to a cloud-based approach, that would give much more flexibility in terms of working with them."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 6th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 21 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, AWS WAF and Imperva Web Application Firewall, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Fortinet FortiDDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and Corero. See our Imperva DDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.