


Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server.
It should be more user-friendly overall, because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
Developing any kind of web application server is time-consuming and expensive, and I can use Tomcat as a commodity, which is an existing tool that everybody uses.
There are typically no significant issues.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
I would rate the support from Microsoft very high because I definitely got all the help during the testing time of the development kit while we were configuring features on our on-premises server.
I would rate customer service and support from Oracle for this product as either nine or ten.
We have the portal, which is appropriately escalated based on the severity of the ticket.
They are proactive in looking into the tickets we create in case we have unresolved queries.
Everything regarding technical support from Apache is in the documentation or in some discussion portal.
Cloud solutions may have better scalability options compared to IIS.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
I find Oracle WebLogic Server to be highly scalable, rating it as nine out of ten.
The biggest benefit I see from Oracle WebLogic Server is that it is beneficial; we are stable through a large volume of transactions.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
It was secured for us, as we launched the product, and people were accessing it from India and Virginia, and we had no problem.
You can check the memory consumption and the number of crashes.
It's influenced by the server's service performance.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
It should be more user-friendly because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
Using scripting allows for the creation of resources.
Tomcat needs a more robust logging error details feature; the current logging feature is available, but it should be more user-friendly.
I would like a visual tool for configuration to be added to Tomcat.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
We never had any pricing issue, but I don't know if it is competitive or not.
We are working with an embedded license; for us, it is acceptable, but in reality, the open full license will be costly because it is a number-of-core-based licensing.
Since it is open source, I don't see any fee for that regarding whether the license for Tomcat is usually expensive or quite affordable.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
IIS is free.
The configurations are simple, making it very easy to use and to set up everything.
It also offers cluster services, which means I can install, create clusters, and add WebLogic Servers as members.
I am able to have a highly scalable, highly demanding, enterprise deployment.
The advantages of Tomcat include its flexibility; we can increase the heap memory and the size of sessions as per our custom needs.
It is not just simple in terms of interface; it is simple for managing or very quickly running this server.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tomcat | 12.9% |
| Oracle WebLogic Server | 12.0% |
| IIS | 7.1% |
| Other | 68.0% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
Oracle WebLogic Server is a powerful enterprise application server renowned for hosting and managing Java-based applications. Its robust infrastructure supports seamless deployment, making it suitable for both on-premises and cloud environments.
Oracle WebLogic Server provides a comprehensive solution for enterprise Java deployments, offering strong integration capabilities with Oracle technologies and other enterprise systems. It features a versatile administration console and robust clustering that ensure high scalability, stability, and reliability. Known for its comprehensive monitoring tools, WebLogic Server ensures that applications perform optimally, while its flexibility and ease of management make it a preferred choice for many enterprises. Despite its high pricing and certain challenges like start-up times and configuration complexities, it remains a strong choice for organizations needing reliable, high-performance application hosting. Oracle's efforts to address patch management, error handling, and memory management continue to evolve, aiming to enhance overall efficiency and security.
What are the key features of Oracle WebLogic Server?Oracle WebLogic Server is predominantly deployed in industries needing robust application hosting and management, such as banking, e-commerce, insurance, and financial services. Its reliability and adaptability make it suitable for internal applications, ERP solutions, and load distribution tasks. Organizations utilize it for SOAP solutions and develop platforms both on-premises and in the cloud, benefiting from its powerful integration with Oracle Service Bus and efficient management of client-specific environments.
Tomcat is a reliable and efficient web server, popular for hosting and running Java-based applications. It is praised for its scalability, compatibility with different operating systems and development frameworks, and its ability to handle heavy workloads.
Users appreciate Tomcat's ease of use, robust performance, reliable server functionality, seamless integration with various platforms, extensive documentation, and strong community support.