"It's quite integratable so you can actually integrate and get IP malware and URL information. It also gives you some form of intelligence into what you're trying to investigate or what you're trying to understand."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"You have to look for the new information from X-Force. X-Force will provide it but you have to look for it. We need clearer visibility."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
IBM X-Force is ranked 7th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. IBM X-Force is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM X-Force writes "Speed threat assessment ,security investigations leveraging on real time actionable threat intel integrated to your Security Intelligence Platform". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". IBM X-Force is most compared with IBM QRadar, Recorded Future, AT&T AlienVault USM, CrowdStrike Falcon and Mandiant Advantage, whereas Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Cisco Threat Grid, Recorded Future, AT&T AlienVault USM, CrowdStrike Falcon and LogRhythm NextGen SIEM.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
