Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM X-Force Exchange vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

IBM and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #20 with an average rating of 6.0. IBM holds a 1.5% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
IBM X-Force Exchange
Read 4 IBM X-Force Exchange reviews
  • 814 Views
  • 594 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews
  • 1,260 Views
  • 1,058 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and IBM X-Force Exchange are two competing cyber threat intelligence platforms. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus holds the upper hand in data accuracy and reliability, while IBM X-Force Exchange stands out for its comprehensive and advanced features.

What features are offered by Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to IBM X-Force Exchange?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus features user-friendly threat intelligence data, detailed threat analysis, and easy threat identification and response. IBM X-Force Exchange offers an extensive threat database, robust analytics tools, and deep insights catering to enterprises.

What areas of improvement can be found in Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to IBM X-Force Exchange?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus needs more integration capabilities, expanded tool compatibility, and a broader ecosystem. IBM X-Force Exchange requires improvements in data update speed, higher efficiency, and integration with existing tools.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to IBM X-Force Exchange?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, while IBM X-Force Exchange’s deployment is complex but has robust ongoing support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to IBM X-Force Exchange?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is cost-effective with strong ROI from affordable pricing and efficient threat detection. IBM X-Force Exchange has a higher setup cost but justifies it with advanced features and detailed analytics providing good ROI for larger enterprises.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM X-Force Exchange vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM X-Force Exchange vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM X-Force Exchange
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
20th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM X-Force Exchange is 1.5%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM X-Force Exchange1.5%
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus1.2%
Other97.3%
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

JohnTamakloe - PeerSpot reviewer
A threat intelligence platform aiming to enhance its intelligence
It falls under the category of AI-embedded threat intelligence, which makes detection more efficient by reducing the rate of false positives and improving the overall detection rate. When the threat intelligence alone doesn’t provide enough information, we use other methods to verify the threat. For example, IBM has its threat intelligence team and tools. If the threat intelligence doesn’t yield much information, the tool has a framework that can identify suspicious activity. We then use our judgment and experience to implement compensating controls, whether for a potentially malicious patch, IP address, or any other threat. Customers benefit from it, even if they’re not directly integrating it. Through our service, they receive the benefits of the integration. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review
RichPhillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.  The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies.  I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.  I…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This product has helped to increase staff productivity."
"It's quite integratable so you can actually integrate and get IP malware and URL information. It also gives you some form of intelligence into what you're trying to investigate or what you're trying to understand."
"The most valuable feature is you have the expertise of human experience directly involved. There is a team of experts."
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"You have to look for the new information from X-Force. X-Force will provide it but you have to look for it. We need clearer visibility."
"I would like to see better integration with other systems, solutions, and vendors."
"We would like to have more AI capabilities to detect threats and improve its productivity from a cybersecurity standpoint."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One of the fastest ways to cut costs is reducing staff, and this product can reduce staff by 70 percent."
"Cost is clearly a consideration, but the important thing is what we do with the data and how we protect it."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
"It is expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Performing Arts
13%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM X-Force?
It is very expensive.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM X-Force?
It's a threat intelligence platform, and we aim to enhance its intelligence by integrating additional security solutions.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM X-Force?
It falls under the category of AI-embedded threat intelligence, which makes detection more efficient by reducing the rate of false positives and improving the overall detection rate. When the threa...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

VirusTotal vs IBM X-Force Exchange Logo
VirusTotal vs IBM X-Force Exchange
Compared 34% of the time
Recorded Future vs IBM X-Force Exchange Logo
Recorded Future vs IBM X-Force Exchange
Compared 20% of the time
ReversingLabs vs IBM X-Force Exchange Logo
ReversingLabs vs IBM X-Force Exchange
Compared 19% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs IBM X-Force Exchange Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs IBM X-Force Exchange
Compared 14% of the time
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs IBM X-Force Exchange Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs IBM X-Force Exchange
Compared 13% of the time
More IBM X-Force Exchange Competitors
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 54% of the time
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 46% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
August 2025
IBM X-Force Exchange reportDownload IBM X-Force Exchange product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
August 2025
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reportDownload Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report
 

Also Known As

X-Force Exchange, X-Force
Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
 

Overview

IBM X-Force Exchange is a cloud-based threat intelligence sharing platform enabling users to rapidly research the latest security threats, aggregate actionable intelligence and collaborate with peers. IBM X-Force Exchange is supported by human- and machine-generated intelligence leveraging the scale of IBM X-Force.
IBM

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
IBM X-Force Exchange vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
July 2025
Free Report: IBM X-Force Exchange vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM X-Force Exchange vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM X-Force Exchange vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.