Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Watson Campaign Automation vs Structured comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Watson Campaign Automation
Ranking in Marketing Automation
21st
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Structured
Ranking in Marketing Automation
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Channel Marketing Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Marketing Automation category, the mindshare of IBM Watson Campaign Automation is 1.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Structured is 1.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Marketing Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
StructuredWeb1.9%
IBM Watson Campaign Automation1.1%
Other97.0%
Marketing Automation
 

Featured Reviews

it_user701487 - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable features include creating and using defined templates. I would like to see reporting capabilities and graphing reports.
We are currently planning to switch at the end of this year to a different ESP. One reason was that, with IBM's takeover of SilverPop, we did discover that customer care and our relationship/sales manager were no longer responsive or as caring as they had been in the past seven or eight years. The feeling is very different. We had never felt ignored because we are not super-users, but now, we do feel that way.
Joan Morales - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved our TCO and also helped us to provide a better experience for our partners because now everything is in the same tool
The best features in the solution include the ease of use and flexibility of the tool, and its ability to accommodate different kinds of features and needs that we always come across and need to solve for. The ability to provide content and deliver content to an international audience of channel partners is significant for us. Being able to cater to international users globally is one of the great uses of the tool. StructuredWeb can implement AI capabilities within the tool, which we have deployed, is really quite unique and very helpful. Additionally, the ability to translate content to any language with AI translation integrated as part of the tool allows one partner to access a piece of content and translate it to any language for their own use. My impression of the solution's focus on partner marketing is that it has improved our marketing efforts. We have been able to replace existing tools that we had with multiple tools. Consolidating everything in one single tool—StructuredWeb—has allowed us to save costs through the process and solve for lower management costs from our perspective. It has improved our TCO and also helped us to provide a better experience for our partners because now everything is in the same tool instead of managing two different tools that do not talk to each other easily, improving the experience for partners.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Marketing Automation solutions are best for your needs.
872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StructuredWeb?
The pricing for StructuredWeb is not cheap; it's certainly one of the more expensive projects of its type within the company. However, it is cheaper than E2open used to be for VMware, which had a l...
What needs improvement with StructuredWeb?
To improve the solution, I think the most important change would be expanding the number of files supported for import. One of the ongoing issues we've had is the platform's ability to consume cont...
What is your primary use case for StructuredWeb?
My main use cases for StructuredWeb are twofold: one is for posting content for our reseller partners to consume and co-brand with, which is primarily for our larger reseller partners. For smaller ...
 

Also Known As

IBM Marketing Cloud, IBM SilverPop
StructuredWeb
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The King Arthur Flour, Stonyfield, InsideOut Development, Moosejaw, Big Scary Cranium, Paper Style
IBM, ServiceNow, Ingram, Veeam, Google, Zoom, Qlik, Arrow, Dell, Microsoft, TD Synnex, HPE
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Adobe, HubSpot and others in Marketing Automation. Updated: October 2025.
872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.