Foglight for Virtualization vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

Quest Software and IBM are both solutions in the Virtualization Management Tools category. Quest Software is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Quest Software holds a 1.2% mindshare in VM, compared to IBM’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Foglight for Virtualization

Read 2 Foglight for Virtualization reviews

122 Views
120 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Turbonomic

Read 205 IBM Turbonomic reviews

5,682 Views
1,250 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Foglight for Virtualization

IBM Turbonomic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 19, 2025

Foglight for Virtualization and IBM Turbonomic are IT infrastructure optimization products. IBM Turbonomic has an advantage due to its robust features and advanced capabilities.

Features: Foglight for Virtualization provides monitoring and diagnostic capabilities, offers real-time performance insights, and identifies bottlenecks effectively. IBM Turbonomic enables automated resource optimization, manages workloads efficiently, and provides comprehensive analytics for predictive decision-making.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Foglight for Virtualization is characterized by its straightforward deployment and reliable support. IBM Turbonomic, despite being complex, offers strong customer support which aids in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Foglight for Virtualization is known for its competitive setup cost and efficient ROI. IBM Turbonomic, while having higher upfront costs, offers considerable long-term returns due to its advanced optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtualization Management Tools Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,300 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Foglight for Virtualization

Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Turbonomic

Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (4th), Cloud Management (4th), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st), AIOps (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Virtualization Management Tools category, the mindshare of Foglight for Virtualization is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 13.0%, up from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtualization Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Turbonomic	13.0%
Quest Foglight for Virtualization	1.2%
Other	85.8%

Virtualization Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Waleed Masad

Technical Manager at METS

Easy-to-setup product with efficient data migration features

Many customers consider Quest Foglight for Virtualization a critical tool for migrations or new projects. In particular, one noteworthy case involved a bank that made Foglight integration a prerequisite. Some customers now rely 100% entirely on Foglight for their daily operations The product is…

Read full review

Dan Ambrose

Infrastructure Engineer 4 at Hyland

Helps visibility, bridges the data gap, and frees up time

We use IBM Turbonomic in a hybrid cloud environment. Although it supports multi-cloud capabilities, we currently operate in a single-cloud setting. Turbonomic offers visibility into our environment's performance, spanning across applications, underlying infrastructure, and protection resources. The visibility and analytics help to bridge the data gap between disparate IT teams such as applications and infrastructure. This is important for awareness collaboration, cost saving, and helping to design and improve our application. Enhanced visibility and data analytics have contributed to a significant reduction in our mean time to resolve. Tools like Turbonomic provide crucial visualization and insights, empowering us to make data-driven decisions instead of relying on assumptions as we did before. This newfound transparency translates to a massive improvement, going from complete darkness to having a clear 100 percent view of the situation. Although our applications are not optimized for the cloud we have seen some improvement in response time. IBM Turbonomic empowers us to achieve more with fewer people thanks to automation. Previously, customers frequently contacted us requesting resource increases to resolve issues. Now, we have a tool that allows us to objectively assess their needs, leading to a deeper understanding of our applications. This solution also generates significant cost savings in the cloud and optimizes hardware utilization within our data centers. Its AI algorithm intelligently allocates servers on hosts, maximizing efficiency without compromising performance. By fine-tuning resource allocation without causing performance bottlenecks, Turbonomic extends the lifespan of existing hardware, postponing the need for new purchases. This effectively stretches our capital expenditure budget. We started to see the benefits of IBM Turbonomic within the first 60 days. IBM is a fantastic partner. Their tech support has been outstanding, and the product itself is excellent - a very solid offering. By automating resource management with Turbonomic, our engineers are freed up to focus on more strategic initiatives like innovation and ongoing organizational projects. Previously, manually adding resources was a time-consuming process that interrupted workflows. Now, automation handles scaling efficiently, saving us thousands of man-hours and significant costs. It has illuminated the need for SetOps. It has highlighted areas of overspending, and the actions we've taken have demonstrated significant cost savings. IBM Turbonomic has positively impacted our overall application performance. IBM Turbonomic has helped reduce both CAPEX and OPEX. It has also significantly reduced cloud build times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is stable and easy to set up. It provides minimum false alarms."

"Turbonomic can show us if we're not using some of our storage volumes efficiently in AWS. For example, if we've over-provisioned one of our virtual machines to have dedicated IOPs that it doesn't need, Turbonomic will detect that and tell us."

"We have a system where our developers automate machine builds, and that is constantly running out of resources. Turbonomic helps us with that, so I don't have to keep buying hardware. The developers always say, "They don't have enough. They don't have enough. They don't have enough," when they just configured it improperly. Therefore, Turbonomic helps us identify configuration issues on their side so it doesn't cost me money on the other end to buy resources that I don't really need."

"With Turbonomic, we were able to reduce our ESX cluster size and save money on our maintenance and license renewals. It saved us around $75,000 per year but it's a one-time reduction in VMware licensing. We don't renew the support. The ongoing savings is probably $50,000 to $75,000 a year, but there was a one-time of $200,000 plus."

"Rightsizing is valuable. Its recommendations are pretty good."

"It has automated a lot of things. We have saved 30 to 35 percent in human resource time and cost, which is pretty substantial. We don't have a big workforce here, so we have to use all the automation we can get."

"With over 2500 ESX VMs, including 1500+ XenDesktop VDI desktops, hosted over two datacentres and 80+ vSphere hosts, firefighting has become something of the past."

"The solution has a good optimization feature."

"It became obvious to us that there was a lot more being offered in the product that we could leverage to ensure our VMware environment was running efficiently."

More IBM Turbonomic pros

Cons

"Quest Foglight for Virtualization's integration needs enhancement."

"The old interface was not the clearest UI in some areas, and could be quite intimidating when first using the tool."

"We don't use Turbonomic for FinOps and part of the reason is its cost reporting. The reporting could be much more robust and, if that were the case, I could pitch it for FinOps."

"The implementation could be enhanced."

"I like the detail I get in the old user interface and will miss some of that in the new interface when we perform our planned upgrade soon."

"The GUI and policy creation have room for improvement. There should be a better view of some of the numbers that are provided and easier to access. And policy creation should have it easier to identify groups."

"The way it handles updates needs to be improved."

"We're still evaluating the solution, so I don't know enough about what I don't know. They've done a lot over the years. I used Turbonomics six or seven years ago before IBM bought them. They've matured a lot since then."

"If they would educate their customers to understand the latest updates, that would help customers... Also, there are a lot of features that are not available in Turbonomic. For example, PaaS component optimization and automation are still in the development phase."

More IBM Turbonomic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."

"It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year."

"It's worth the time and money investment if you can afford it."

"Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."

"Licensing is per socket, so load up on the cores rather than a lot of lower core CPUs."

"I don't know the current prices, but I like how the licensing is based on the number of instances instead of sockets, clusters, or cores. We have some VMs that are so heavy I can only fit four on one server. It's not cost-effective if we have to pay more for those. When I move around a VM SQL box with 30 cores and a half-terabyte of RAM, I'm not paying for an entire socket and cores where people assume you have at least 10 or 20 VMs on that socket for that pricing."

"When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for."

"I consider the pricing to be high."

More IBM Turbonomic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	57
Large Enterprise	147

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest Foglight for Virtualization?

The product is stable and easy to set up. It provides minimum false alarms.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Foglight for Virtualization?

The product is affordable. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Foglight for Virtualization?

Quest Foglight for Virtualization's integration needs enhancement.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?

It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is set as a percentage of the consumption of some of our customers' services. The ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Turbonomic?

The implementation could be enhanced.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?

We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting. This helps us get a consolidated view of all customer spending into a single d...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 10% of the time

VMware vSphere vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudability vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Turbonomic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

August 2025

Download Foglight for Virtualization product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Turbonomic

August 2025

Download IBM Turbonomic product report

Also Known As

VKernel vScope Explorer, vOPS Server, Vizioncore

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Quest Software

IBM

Overview

Foglight for Virtualization optimizes and monitors virtual environments, offering insights into performance and resource allocation to enhance virtualization management efficiency.

Designed to provide IT professionals with robust capabilities, Foglight for Virtualization aids in monitoring performance, managing resources, and troubleshooting. It delivers comprehensive analytics that helps identify issues before they impact operations, thereby supporting proactive management of virtual infrastructures. As virtualization becomes crucial in IT infrastructure, having a tool like Foglight that ensures high efficiency and minimal downtime is invaluable.

What are the valuable features of Foglight for Virtualization?

Comprehensive Analytics: Provides detailed insights into virtual environments, facilitating informed management decisions.
Resource Optimization: Ensures efficient allocation of resources by identifying underused and overused assets.
Performance Troubleshooting: Quickly pinpoints issues impacting virtual environment performance.
Capacity Planning: Aids in predicting future needs to prevent resource shortages.
Cross-Platform Support: Manages diverse virtualization platforms within a single dashboard.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations by reducing diagnostic and troubleshooting time.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource utilization, leading to decreased hardware and energy expenses.
Scalability: Supports growth by providing adaptable management solutions for expanding virtual environments.
Enhanced Performance: Ensures smooth operations with proactive management and monitoring.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes interruptions by resolving performance issues promptly.

This tool is implemented across sectors like finance, healthcare, and education, where managing virtualized environments efficiently is crucial. Users in these industries rely on Foglight for its ability to adapt to specific requirements and maintain high standards of performance in complex infrastructures.

Quest Software

IBM Turbonomic offers automation, planning, and right-sizing recommendations to streamline resource management, improve efficiencies, and optimize costs across virtualized environments and cloud platforms.

IBM Turbonomic is valued for its capability to optimize resource allocation and monitor virtual environments efficiently. It facilitates automated decision-making in VM sizing, load balancing, and cost optimization for both on-premises and cloud deployments. Users can leverage insights for workload placement, ensure peak performance assurance, and effectively right-size across VMware and Azure. The ongoing transition to HTML5 aims to improve visual and navigational ease, while expanded reporting features are anticipated. Opportunities for improved training, documentation, and integrations enhance platform usability and functionality.

What Are the Key Features?

Automation: Streamlines resource allocation and VM management.
Planning Tools: Supports capacity management and growth projections.
Right-Sizing: Optimizes VM configurations for efficient resource use.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides quick insights into environment health.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers valuable data for informed decision-making.
Cloud Integration: Ensures cost-effective resource utilization.

What Benefits Should Be Looked For?

Performance Enhancement: Improves application performance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes operational expenses through optimizations.
Infrastructure Efficiency: Maximizes use of IT infrastructure resources.

In finance, IBM Turbonomic aids in maintaining platform efficiency during market fluctuations. Healthcare organizations leverage its capability for resource optimization during high-demand periods to enhance patient care support. Retailers use it for planning in peak seasons, ensuring resources align with fluctuating demand to maintain performance continuity.

IBM

Sample Customers

Unimat, AeroM_xico Delta TechOps

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Virtualization Management Tools. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtualization Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.