IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs Quantum DXi Series comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."
  • More IBM Tivoli CDP for Files Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery Software solutions are best for your needs.
    620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable.
    Top Answer:It's expensive, but it's worth it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year.
    Top Answer:We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    318
    Comparisons
    247
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    337
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    973
    Comparisons
    835
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli CDP for Files
    DXi Series, Quantum DX
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Continuous Data Protection for Files is a continuous backup software that protects your most important files. This real-time, continuous data protection solution for file servers and user endpoints automatically backs up your most critical files the moment they are saved.

    Quantum's DXi series deduplication solutions provides patented variable-length deduplication that not only reduces disk usage and capital expenditures, but also enables efficient data movement across the WAN to other sites and to the cloud.

    Offer
    Learn more about IBM Tivoli CDP for Files
    Learn more about Quantum DXi Series
    Sample Customers
    Cyberian Data Protection
    Nihon Unisys, Nikoyo China
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Educational Organization8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Backup and Recovery Software
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Rubrik, Zerto and others in Backup and Recovery Software. Updated: July 2022.
    620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 42nd in Backup and Recovery Software with 1 review while Quantum DXi Series is ranked 50th in Backup and Recovery Software. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 9.0, while Quantum DXi Series is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files writes "Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable". On the other hand, IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Quantum DXi Series is most compared with Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), HPE StoreOnce, ExaGrid EX Series, DD Boost and ExaGrid EX.

    See our list of best Backup and Recovery Software vendors.

    We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.