We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface."
"The solution is stable."
"Software deployment and WSUS are most valuable."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is very scalable."
"It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me."
"It's a stable product."
"It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well."
"The solution is highly scalable."
"Provides great insight into the functionalities of the data scope."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems."
"I want the system to provide some dependency relations. I would also like to see the relationship between different machines."
"On some hardware, we'd like an easier way to get peripherals attached."
"Its client interface should be more accessible, and the notifications should be more customizable from the console. It should be more user friendly and have some kind of customized notifications so that we can use it on the client side. These are the reasons why we restricted its use only for the server environment and didn't use it on the client side."
"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."
"The solution does not support remote devices so the CMG is still required."
More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is ranked 17th in IT Asset Management with 1 review while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT writes "A user-friendly solution that has a good user interface, but its technical support is not good enough". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is most compared with BigFix, ServiceNow and BMC Helix Discovery, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.