IBM Security QRadar and Wazuh compete in the security management solutions category. Based on the data comparisons, IBM Security QRadar seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and integration capabilities.
Features: IBM Security QRadar provides robust features like automatic log source identification, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive integration with multiple platforms. Its User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and seamless scalability further enhance its value. Wazuh stands out for its open-source foundation, offering affordability alongside features such as file integrity monitoring and active response.
Room for Improvement: IBM Security QRadar needs to refine its incident management capabilities, graphical representation for analytics, and simplify its licensing complexity. Upgrading processes and modular functionality support could be improved. Wazuh, while affordable, requires enhancements in threat intelligence features, scalability for large environments, and Unix systems monitoring. Its setup process could benefit from being more user-friendly, and more comprehensive out-of-the-box reporting is needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security QRadar offers flexible deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, although customer service receives mixed reviews due to slow response times. In contrast, Wazuh's open-source nature provides straightforward deployment in various cloud models, with users benefiting from community-driven support albeit limited professional service options compared to IBM.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Security QRadar is known for its high costs, potentially limiting small business access. Its ROI is justified by its comprehensive features and reliability. Wazuh's open-source offering makes it a cost-effective option for small to mid-sized organizations, though additional expenses may arise from professional support and customization.
With SOAR, the workflow takes one minute or less to complete the analysis.
Investing this amount was very much worth it for my organization.
I have seen value in security cost savings with Wazuh, as using proprietary EDR versions could save us substantial money.
They assist with advanced issues, such as hardware or other problems, that are not part of standard operations.
Support needs to understand the issue first, then escalate it to the engineering team.
The support is really good; for instance, if a critical ticket is submitted, you will get paged right away as it gets logged, and their analyst will look into it, letting you know as soon as possible so you can work on it.
They responded quickly, which was crucial as I was on a time constraint.
We use the open-source version of Wazuh, which does not provide paid support.
The documentation is good and provides clear instructions, though it's targeted at those with technical backgrounds.
For EPS license, if you increase or exceed the EPS license, you cannot receive events.
It can accommodate thousands of endpoints on one instance, and multiple instances can run for different clients.
Currently, I don't see any limitations in terms of scalability as Wazuh can still connect many endpoints.
Scalability depends on the configuration and the infrastructure resources like compute and memory we allocate.
I think QRadar is stable and currently satisfies my needs.
The product has been stable so far.
The stability of Wazuh is strong, with no issues stemming from the solution itself.
The stability of Wazuh is largely dependent on maintenance.
The indexer frequently times out, requiring system restarts.
We receive logs from different types of devices and need a way to correlate them effectively.
If AI-related support can suggest rules and integrate with existing security devices like MD, IPS, this SIM can create more relevant rules.
IBM Security QRadar does not support Canvas, so we had to create custom scripts and workarounds to pull logs from Canvas.
Machine learning is needed along with understanding user behavior and behavioral patterns.
The integration modules are insufficiently developed, necessitating the creation of custom integration solutions using tools like Logstash and PubSub.
I think Wazuh should improve by introducing AI functionalities, as it would be beneficial to see AI incorporated in the threat hunting and detection functionalities.
Splunk is more expensive than IBM Security QRadar.
Wazuh is completely free of charge.
I would definitely recommend Wazuh, especially considering Fortinet's licensing model which is confusing and overpriced in my opinion.
Totaling around two lakh Indian rupees per month.
Recently, I faced an incident, a cyber incident, and it was detected in real time.
IBM is seeking information about IBM QRadar because a part of QRadar, especially in the cloud, has been sold to Palo Alto.
We have FortiSOAR and IBM Resilient for IBM Security QRadar orchestration.
Wazuh is a SIEM tool that is highly customizable and versatile.
The system allows us to monitor endpoints effectively and collect security data that can be utilized across other platforms such as SOAR.
With this open source tool, organizations can establish their own customized setup.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Wazuh | 10.9% |
| IBM Security QRadar | 7.2% |
| Other | 81.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 88 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 102 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
IBM Security QRadar (recently acquired by Palo Alto Networks) is a security and analytics platform designed to defend against threats and scale security operations. This is done through integrated visibility, investigation, detection, and response. QRadar empowers security groups with actionable insights into high-priority threats by providing visibility into enterprise security data. Through centralized visibility, security teams and analysts can determine their security stance, which areas pose a potential threat, and which areas are critical. This will help streamline workflows by eliminating the need to pivot between tools.
IBM Security QRadar is built to address a wide range of security issues and can be easily scaled with minimal customization effort required. As data is ingested, QRadar administers automated, real-time security intelligence to swiftly and precisely discover and prioritize threats. The platform will issue alerts with actionable, rich context into developing threats. Security teams and analysts can then rapidly respond to minimize the attackers' strike. The solution will provide a complete view of activity in both cloud-based and on-premise environments as a large amount of data is ingested throughout the enterprise. Additionally, QRadar’s anomaly detection intelligence enables security teams to identify any user behavior changes that could be indicators of potential threats.
IBM QRadar Log Manager
To better help organizations protect themselves against potential security threats, attacks, and breaches, IBM QRadar Log Manager gathers, analyzes, preserves, and reports on security log events using QRadar Sense Analytics. All operating systems and applications, servers, devices, and applications are converted into searchable and actionable intelligent data. QRadar Log Manager then helps organizations meet compliance reporting and monitoring requirements, which can be further upgraded to QRadar SIEM for a more superior level of threat protection.
Some of QRadar Log Manager’s key features include:
Reviews from Real Users
IBM Security QRadar is a solution of choice among users because it provides a complete solution for security teams by integrating network analysis, log management, user behavior analytics, threat intelligence, and AI-powered investigations into a single solution. Users particularly like having a single window into their network and its ability to be used for larger enterprises.
Simon T., a cyber security services operations manager at an aerospace/defense firm, notes, "The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis."
A management executive at a security firm says, "What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."
Wazuh offers comprehensive security features like MITRE ATT&CK correlation, log monitoring, and cloud-native infrastructure. It ensures compliance and provides intrusion detection with high scalability and open-source flexibility, ideal for businesses seeking robust SIEM capabilities.
Wazuh stands out in security information and event management by providing efficient log aggregation, vulnerability scanning, and event correlation against MITRE ATT&CK. Its capability to integrate seamlessly with environments, manage compliance, and monitor files makes it suitable for cloud-native infrastructures and financial sectors. Despite its technical support needing enhancement and opportunities for improving AI integration and threat intelligence, its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness make it appealing. Users can leverage custom dashboards powered by Elasticsearch for precise data analysis, even though there is a desire for a more user-friendly interface and better enterprise solution integration. Deployment may be complex, but its features contribute significantly to fortified security postures.
What are the essential features of Wazuh?Industries like finance and cloud infrastructure heavily utilize Wazuh for its security strengths. By monitoring endpoints and ensuring compliance with frameworks, companies can improve security posture and swiftly detect anomalies. The platform's focus on event correlation and alerts for security incidents is particularly beneficial.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
