We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Rapid7 InsightOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is suitable for large companies with critical infrastructure. For our clients, robustness, availability at a high level, and the level of references and experiences connected to the solution are important."
"It is a very optimized engine."
"Most valuable features include the granularity of information."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics has easy architecture, has a good portfolio and integration."
"The most valuable features would have to be the products' ability to customize vulnerability management settings."
"We run 65 servers globally with just two people: an engineering person and me."
"There are more than 120 extensions in QRadar, which are easy to install and configure. These can improve your analysis of events."
"The pre-canned rules and reports in this product are a huge plus."
"The ability to browse logs from multiple sources at the same time really speeds up root cause analysis."
"Integration of InsightOps with other tools, especially SIEM solutions, has generally improved operational efficiency."
"It has the ability to alert and track logs from different sources."
"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 InsightOps is the search functionality."
"We can save logs as plain text."
"The user interface is a bit clunky, a bit hard to find what you need."
"I would like to see the update process simplified."
"The features that could be improved include the licensing model and the dashboards and all those presentations. Overall, the user experience part can be improved."
"With IBM Security QRadar, my company faced issues with the support we received for the product."
"The product can be a bit complex."
"I don't look at only the features and benefits; I also look at the price. It is a bit expensive when compared with other solutions. It is expensive for specific deployment topologies, and the decision-makers go for alternatives like ArcSight. It should also have more AI features or capabilities for better threat intelligence. The more it uses machine learning, the better would be the dashboard, analytics, and other things."
"If you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. You need to have more storage."
"The solution is highly used here in Pakistan and in many sectors, they could improve it by having more SIEM connectors."
"Since I used the beta, improvements are to be expected. The dashboard options could have been clearer, but I believe it is more a problem with the limited documentation available at the time."
"There are a few things I would like to do with a few more complex queries which I am not able to do right now, because it is a SaaS solution."
"Rapid7 InsightOps could improve by making the search query better. There are times when the search query is broken and it does not find anything."
"The solution takes a little bit of time when we load the website for the first time."
"Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Rapid7 InsightOps is ranked 35th in Log Management with 9 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Rapid7 InsightOps is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightOps writes "Useful search functionality, easy to use, and reliable". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Rapid7 InsightOps is most compared with Wazuh, Datadog, New Relic, Splunk Enterprise Security and LogRhythm SIEM. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Rapid7 InsightOps report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.