We performed a comparison between IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer and Informatica Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Quality solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can also schedule and run data quality on the critical data elements on the databases."
"What's most useful in IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is you can access it from anywhere. It's also pretty easy to learn, so even non-technical business people use it and found the solution easy to learn."
"Informatica Data Quality is a product that is worth the money."
"We use it for various use cases, including data provisioning, data validation, continuous monitoring of data quality, and data standardization."
"I give the stability a ten out of ten."
"We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality."
"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."
"I am impressed by the solution's interface."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution is applicable for both technical and business users."
"The solution is outdated and is not on cloud."
"What could be improved or added to IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is more connectors. This solution comes in a package with IBM InfoSphere DataStage and is missing a lot of connectors to various, new data sources, so IBM needs to work on that area. Compared with competitors such as Informatica and Alation which acquired other small companies to work on the connectors, IBM has not done any testing and has tried to develop the connectors in-house, but that's taking a lot of time. As a result, my company is unable to connect to a lot of data sources, particularly modern data sources."
"The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration."
"Informatica is very expensive."
"Exploring the possibility of incorporating AI capabilities that can suggest additional rules would significantly streamline our data analysis process following data profiling."
"Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult."
"The customer servive and support could be faster. There is a slow turnaround."
"There is room for improvement in the Data Marketplace aspect."
"I would like to see better visuals for business users, such as a dashboard where they can precisely track where problems are."
"One area that could use improvement is the speed of the web interfaces. At present, they are very slow. I think it is essential that we are original and robust on-premises."
More IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is ranked 11th in Data Quality with 6 reviews while Informatica Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Quality with 18 reviews. IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is rated 7.6, while Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer writes "Accessible from anywhere and easy to learn even for non-technical users, but needs more connectors and faster issue resolution from technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Quick on profiling and scales very well, but needs better UI and more reporting capabilities". IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is most compared with IBM QualityStage, SAP Data Services and Innovative Systems iLytics Enterprise Data Quality, whereas Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Talend Data Quality, Trillium TS Quality, Oracle Data Quality and SAP Information Steward. See our IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer vs. Informatica Data Quality report.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
