IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus comparison

IBM and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. IBM is ranked #51 with an average rating of 5.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.3. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Read 4 IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment reviews

1,003 Views
973 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Vulnerability ...

Read 3 ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus reviews

1,144 Views
1,144 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

ManageEngine Vulnerability ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

51st

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Vulnerability ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

31st

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus	0.8%
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment	0.7%
Other	98.5%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Dr. Sajid Latif

Guardium Administrator at Interactive Group

Improvements sought in database optimization while benefiting from robust security monitoring

We use the analytical functionality of Guardium, but the analytical functionality is not so powerful or flexible because it does not include the application user ID. It only includes the database user ID. To identify risky users, it does not support end users, so IBM must incorporate this feature into the built-in analytical engine of the Guardium. There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible. When you make a query in a MySQL database, it takes too much time to respond. IBM should replace this MySQL database with a more powerful internal database for the logging mechanism so that Guardium can collect logging data flexibly and ensure optimization. My overall experience with Guardium is good. The only problem is that IBM must replace the internal DB, MySQL, with a more powerful enterprise-level database because enterprises use it at an enterprise level, and MySQL does not support optimally.

Read full review

MB24

IT Helpdesk at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Enhanced endpoint security with effective patch management and frequent scans

The most valuable feature was the patch management, which was very effective for endpoint-centric solutions requiring remediation of vulnerabilities. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus was the perfect fit for managing these requirements. We improved the number of scans and patches performed from four times per year per computer to four times per month.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."

"The Vulnerability Assessment feature is quite stable and helps identify numerous vulnerabilities in databases."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."

"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements, and it also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis, making it worthwhile from that perspective."

"The best feature is that you can see the activity in your data environment and have the ability to get the vulnerability assessments done quickly with scores that can be compared."

"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."

"The most valuable feature was the patch management, which was very effective for endpoint-centric solutions requiring remediation of vulnerabilities."

"I have been using it for over two years, and it is fantastic."

"ManageEngine is a comprehensive tool that is broad and can be customized to fit specific needs."

"The most valuable feature was the patch management, which was very effective for endpoint-centric solutions requiring remediation of vulnerabilities."

"The solution helps us figure out vulnerabilities and fix them."

Cons

"The only problem is that some of the reports come up with blanks and missing data."

"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."

"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."

"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."

"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."

"There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible."

"I wouldn't use it. That would be my advice to others looking into implementing IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment."

"The user interface is the only drawback of the product."

"The integration with third-party solutions such as ticketing solutions or CMDB solutions can be improved."

"One area that needs improvement is the contract management. My legal team required some partner requirements for that, and ManageEngine could not support it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One thing not advantageous for it was that it was a little bit more expensive. I would rate it one out of five in terms of pricing."

"The price is very reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Government

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

We are still using IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment. We only use IBM Guardium Data Protection and monitoring, data protection and monitoring, classical Guardium. We only use classical Guardium...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

We do not use IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment for data encryption or any other tool for analytics, or identity and governance. We do not use any other solution except for protection and monit...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus?

The solution helps us figure out vulnerabilities and fix them.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus?

ManageEngine is considered an affordable solution, offering competitive pricing compared to similar solutions like Utopia, which was more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus?

The integration with third-party solutions such as ticketing solutions or CMDB solutions can be improved. The asset discovery phase could be simplified if it could integrate with CMDB or MDM soluti...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qualys VMDR vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 27% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 19% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 14% of the time

Tanium vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 11% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Compared 22% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Compared 11% of the time

Vicarius vRx vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Compared 10% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Compared 8% of the time

More ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment report

Download IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus report

Download ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus product report

Overview

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment scans data infrastructures (databases, data warehouses and big data environments) to detect vulnerabilities, and suggests remedial actions. The solution identifies exposures such as missing patches, weak passwords, unauthorized changes and misconfigured privileges.

IBM

Vulnerability Manager Plus is a multi-OS vulnerability management and compliance solution that offers built-in remediation. It is an end-to-end vulnerability management tool delivering comprehensive coverage, continual visibility, rigorous assessment, and integral remediation of threats and vulnerabilities, from a single console. Whether your endpoints are on your local network, in a DMZ (demilitarized zone) network, at a remote location, or on the move, Vulnerability Manager Plus is the go-to solution to empower your distributed workforce with safe working conditions. Learn how to perform step-by-step vulnerability management in your enterprise with Vulnerability Manager Plus.

ManageEngine

Buyer's Guide

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

March 2026

Free Report: IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.