We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."By automating several tasks, we have already reduced a lot of work for the business."
"Agility is the key. It gives our customers a faster way to be able to implement processes, get ownership of task, visibility into a process. The ability to modify that process, optimize that process over time, is probably the biggest benefit that they get from the software."
"IBM's deployment box is one huge black box. We can create all the services with our own code or without a codebase, however, we have a huge amount of space with practically no limitation."
"Its workflow and integration with SAP are the most valuable features. It is also a stable solution."
"We have used a lot of out-of-the-box reporting on the process performance metrics. We have been able to make suggested changes to staff for this role or streamlining by eliminate some activities where people were not requiring a lot of work in the first place."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"There is a component of this BPM pool - I can't recall the name. What it does is, it allows you to create various scenarios and then run them quickly, before actually putting them onto a tool. So I think that part of the tool is really fantastic, because that enables you to create scenarios, create simulations, before actually going out and putting it into the tool itself"
"The functionality to design UI to be responsive and can run on multiple devices."
"There are many features of the solution that are quite useful. For us, the most valuable aspect may be visibility."
"User Interface components could be further refined to enhance and extend customizations dictated by end clients."
"Could increase vulnerability and security patches to make it more robust."
"There are a few areas, like triggering mechanisms, externally exposed variables, and changing its values."
"The constant switch between Eclipse and its web versions can be annoying and confusing."
"We had hoped that the product would provide us with plug-ins like Salesforce. Its development environment needs to improve. We expect to see elastic features like containerization. We don't just need an on-prem virtual machine."
"It might not be suitable for entry level clients because it comes with a huge number of modules for processing that at times might not be necessary for upcoming clients."
"IBM BPM uses JavaScript as a programming language for the server-side. I don’t know why it’s not Java, as it’s more powerful and the JavaScript part is translated into Java anyway."
"The interface is limited and should improve in the future."
"The solution could improve its user interface."
Earn 20 points
IBM BPM is ranked 7th in Application Infrastructure with 105 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is ranked 25th in Application Infrastructure. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management writes "First Look – SAP NetWeaver Decision Service Management". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is most compared with Azul Zulu.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.